BFTG - Rotherham

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9519
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by NewCorkSeth » 23 Oct 2016 14:17

sandman Score when the substitution was made? 0-0.

So for all of Rotherham's "peppering" of our goal the bottom club had scored a grand total of zero goals.

90% of players in this league are going to be bigger and stronger than Liam Kelly. He's not going to get many minutes if he's substituted every time we get a tiny bit of pressure put on us in the air.

This part is completely true.

How many shots did we face before the sub and how many after is the important question.

Some games Santi Cazorla will need to be subbed of in favour of an Elneny or a Xhaka. That doesnt mean Cazorla is not going to get minutes for being short and weak. Stam (I believe until stats show me otherwise) made a correct call in bringing a defensive player further forward and the vilification of him is unnecessary.

User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by CountryRoyal » 23 Oct 2016 14:54

First away game of the season I've missed so understandable the atmosphere was shit.

Sorry lads.

KC Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1353
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 15:36
Location: Kent

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by KC Royal » 23 Oct 2016 18:04

sandman Score when the substitution was made? 0-0.

So for all of Rotherham's "peppering" of our goal the bottom club had scored a grand total of zero goals.

90% of players in this league are going to be bigger and stronger than Liam Kelly. He's not going to get many minutes if he's substituted every time we get a tiny bit of pressure put on us in the air.


Uldrink said pre-match that Rotherham played passing football and concede goals. I don't really expect that to be the case under Kenny Jackett so I imagine they weren't prepared for how Rotherham were going to play. It made the scouting they did rather irrelevant.

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by sandman » 23 Oct 2016 18:06

Get what you're saying but i severely doubt that Jackett had that much influence after the grand total of one training session.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11692
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by RoyalBlue » 23 Oct 2016 19:31

sandman Get what you're saying but i severely doubt that Jackett had that much influence after the grand total of one training session.


Only it's a lot easier to get players to quickly switch to hitting the ball long than to persuade and teach them to pass the ball around effectively on the ground.


User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12801
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by paultheroyal » 23 Oct 2016 19:41

We were getting battered. Manager adapts to situation and comes away with the 3 points.

Cue the bellends on here. Only on HNA.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23973
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by AthleticoSpizz » 23 Oct 2016 19:59

A day too late.....it's already been said.....but echo that sentiment

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by LoyalRoyal22 » 24 Oct 2016 09:58

Good display. Glad to see the team are making small improvements each week on the current tactical plan. Second half we were cutting through them with short incisive passing. Joey was exceptional at the base of the midfield.

Al Habsi- 9
Gunter- 6
Moore- 7
Mcshane- 7
Obita- 6
Joey- 9
Swift- 7
Williams- 6
McCleary- 7
Yann- 7
Beerens- 7

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by LoyalRoyal22 » 24 Oct 2016 10:00

sandman Yeah, credit to Stam for giving one of our academy products a grand total of 25 minutes.

It's 25 minutes more than most of them will get, outside the cup competitions, under his management.



Jaap made the wrong decision in starting him, & the correct decision in taking him off

Rotherham were a real threat with the long balls, and nearly scored once or twice, Kelly was offering nothing defensively and his limitations in jumping/heading were a real concern. Good tactical awareness to spot & rectify this.


User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by LoyalRoyal22 » 24 Oct 2016 10:03

sandman Get what you're saying but i severely doubt that Jackett had that much influence after the grand total of one training session.


Psychology & the mental state of players has a major affect on performances, and the arrival of the new manager would have given them a lift and a new level of determination to perform.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7335
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by tidus_mi2 » 24 Oct 2016 10:19

If Rotherham were indeed a passing side before we played them it suggests Kenny Jackett did come in and tell them to start playing the long ball, if it were me I would have made the assumption that Kenny Jackett had arrived too soon to make significant changes to their style of play, perhaps Stam and his team arrived to the same conclusion.

Either way they were adept enough to analyse the situation and make the required change and frankly if there are fans out there who were quick to criticise his lack of changes when we were tiring against Villa, surely they have to acknowledge when he makes an apt tactical change, especially 30 minutes in.

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12801
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by paultheroyal » 24 Oct 2016 10:34

sandman Get what you're saying but i severely doubt that Jackett had that much influence after the grand total of one training session.


Reading the press reports from a Rotherham perspective it looks like he played a massive influence in getting them competing which makes our win even more impressive.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25496
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by genome » 24 Oct 2016 10:36

sandman Get what you're saying but i severely doubt that Jackett had that much influence after the grand total of one training session.


He could well have done, it doesn't take more than training session or team meeting for the manager to tell them "go long, win headers, send long throws into the box". Not exactly a complex tactical plan.


mambo3
Member
Posts: 411
Joined: 31 May 2011 21:18

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by mambo3 » 24 Oct 2016 11:44

I don't understand how taking Kelly off was a good tactical switch, as if as soon as they took him off the game changed. it didn't.
Remember ROTHERHAM we are playing, bottom of the League? Goal Average poor? we should have beat them with 10 men
on the pitch, he should have kept him on and be more interested in winning the game going forward then defending. If it was not for Al Habsi it could have been a complete different story none of them attempts on Readings goal had anything to do with Kelly, just poor defending. Yann was the other player who if not for his defensive qualities it would have been even worse. we need to wake up to the fact that the pressure is building.

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by LoyalRoyal22 » 24 Oct 2016 15:24

mambo3 I don't understand how taking Kelly off was a good tactical switch, as if as soon as they took him off the game changed. it didn't.
Remember ROTHERHAM we are playing, bottom of the League? Goal Average poor? we should have beat them with 10 men
on the pitch, he should have kept him on and be more interested in winning the game going forward then defending. If it was not for Al Habsi it could have been a complete different story none of them attempts on Readings goal had anything to do with Kelly, just poor defending. Yann was the other player who if not for his defensive qualities it would have been even worse. we need to wake up to the fact that the pressure is building.



What pressure? fair to say we are exceeding expectations currently :D

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by Maneki Neko » 24 Oct 2016 16:09

mambo3 I don't understand how taking Kelly off was a good tactical switch, as if as soon as they took him off the game changed. it didn't.
Remember ROTHERHAM we are playing, bottom of the League? Goal Average poor? we should have beat them with 10 men
on the pitch, he should have kept him on and be more interested in winning the game going forward then defending. If it was not for Al Habsi it could have been a complete different story none of them attempts on Readings goal had anything to do with Kelly, just poor defending. Yann was the other player who if not for his defensive qualities it would have been even worse. we need to wake up to the fact that the pressure is building.
:|

KC Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1353
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 15:36
Location: Kent

Re: BFTG - Rotherham

by KC Royal » 24 Oct 2016 18:47

I presume mambo is talking about the pressure within a game, rather than pressure on our league position.

Had another look and not sure whether I was dreaming it but couldn't see any mention by Ulderink of Rotherham playing a passing game :oops: He did suggest they were open though. Not quite sure why some are dismissing Rotherham either. New manager (and someone who I thought they should have got in the summer, Stubbs was an odd choice) and we hadn't won there in ages, thought we'd actually lose and know a couple of neutrals who thought the same.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: belgrove123, Orion1871 and 181 guests

It is currently 30 May 2024 14:03