Reading had the benefit of refereeing decisions this season!

User avatar
Dave the rave
Member
Posts: 889
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 18:15
Location: Likes this

by Dave the rave » 17 May 2007 15:28

One Beer is never enough. If they are ALL the mistakes refs have made over the course of this season (that have directly affected a scoreline), then we must have some of the best and most consistent refs in the world.

Why then do I feel the need to scream and question their decision on a far more regular basis than it would appear I am justified to.

Allocation of cards, missing fouls, cheating etc etc also have an affect on scorelines so this table is most definately flawed, m'lud.


Check your user name, friend.

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

by Arch » 17 May 2007 17:47

One Beer is never enough. If they are ALL the mistakes refs have made over the course of this season (that have directly affected a scoreline), then we must have some of the best and most consistent refs in the world.

Why then do I feel the need to scream and question their decision on a far more regular basis than it would appear I am justified to.

Allocation of cards, missing fouls, cheating etc etc also have an affect on scorelines so this table is most definately flawed, m'lud.
I take the oft repeated Steve Coppell line: "if the players made as few mistakes as the officials we'd be top of the league."

User avatar
oldelmparky
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 23:30

by oldelmparky » 19 May 2007 11:47

brummie royal On the same theme:

http://www.rightresult.net

Shows that the good/bad decisions evened themselves out over the season.

Villa, Wigan & Charlton main losers from bad decisions and Spurs, Man City and West Ham the main beneficiaries.


This web site must belong to a Villa supporter. :wink:

User avatar
oldelmparky
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 23:30

Re: Reading had the benefit of refereeing decisions this sea

by oldelmparky » 19 May 2007 12:04

Royal Rother http://www.uneedspecsref.co.uk/



Can this be the only duff result on 13/5?
What about Blackburn v Reading!!!
B's 1st goal Nonda fouled Hahnemann, kicked the ball out of his hands (kicked his hand actually) B's 2nd was offside. Reading's 4th was incorrectly disallowed, Harps never touched him - honest guv.

weybridgewanderer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2372
Joined: 19 Nov 2005 23:08
Location: is it time to go home?

Re: Reading had the benefit of refereeing decisions this sea

by weybridgewanderer » 19 May 2007 12:36

oldelmparky
Royal Rother http://www.uneedspecsref.co.uk/



Can this be the only duff result on 13/5?
What about Blackburn v Reading!!!
B's 1st goal Nonda fouled Hahnemann, kicked the ball out of his hands (kicked his hand actually) B's 2nd was offside. Reading's 4th was incorrectly disallowed, Harps never touched him - honest guv.


certainally wasn't any more a foul that the foul on our keeper in the build up to their first goal


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 396 guests

It is currently 05 Jul 2024 22:01