Royal Rother You fool, are you incapable of reading anything properly?
At last. 10.
I was just commenting on why there seems to be a lot of votes in for the lower reaches of the division.
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Aug 2007 13:44
Royal Rother You fool, are you incapable of reading anything properly?
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 02 Aug 2007 14:05
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Aug 2007 14:07
papereyes Took Spacky longer than I thought it would.
by Royal Rother » 02 Aug 2007 14:16
by Hook Royal » 02 Aug 2007 14:18
SpaceCruiser I was on a course yesterday.
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Aug 2007 14:19
Hook RoyalSpaceCruiser I was on a course yesterday.
Golf or penicillin?
by Hook Royal » 02 Aug 2007 14:20
SpaceCruiserHook RoyalSpaceCruiser I was on a course yesterday.
Golf or penicillin?
H&S
by sheshnu » 02 Aug 2007 14:46
Schards#2 17th - 18th
We start with a weaker squad than last year and one that is carrying several long term injuries. In addition, several key members of the squad are past their peak and we are no longer a surprise package to the opposition.
Many other sides in th bottom half have strengthened significantly and, if we do get in trouble, we won't try and spend our way out of it.
by Schards#2 » 02 Aug 2007 15:01
sheshnuSchards#2 17th - 18th
We start with a weaker squad than last year and one that is carrying several long term injuries. In addition, several key members of the squad are past their peak and we are no longer a surprise package to the opposition.
Many other sides in th bottom half have strengthened significantly and, if we do get in trouble, we won't try and spend our way out of it.
It is impossible to know where to start with that post except to perhaps ask the question: "Have you seen Reading play at all over the last couple of years?"
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Aug 2007 15:08
by Schards#2 » 02 Aug 2007 15:14
SpaceCruiser Schards, you always seem to be pessimistic! I can only think of one who is carrying a long term injury and that's Sonko. Which member of the squad are you referring to as past their peak? And as for "surprise package", that's just a cliche you're trotting out. Surely last year, most managers would have done their homework on us!
by sheshnu » 02 Aug 2007 15:17
Schards#2 Long Term Injuries - Sonko, Convey, Little
Past peak - Murty, Little, Ingemarsson, Hahnemann, Gunnarsson, all good players but will get slower and more injury prone from here on in.
Squad - Sidwell, Seol (seemingly) OUT, Cisse Duberry IN
by Royal Lady » 02 Aug 2007 15:20
So you'd agree that Convey is a LONG TERM injury then, just as he said. I doubt Murty and Ingi will play every game this season as, like it or not, they're getting older and any injuries will take longer to get over, as Murty has already proved in the past. Hahnemann has looked dodgy a few times last season, he may go on longer than outfield players, but not if his form is suffering.sheshnuSchards#2 Long Term Injuries - Sonko, Convey, Little
Past peak - Murty, Little, Ingemarsson, Hahnemann, Gunnarsson, all good players but will get slower and more injury prone from here on in.
Squad - Sidwell, Seol (seemingly) OUT, Cisse Duberry IN
We didn't have Convey for large parts of last season either, nor Kitson who I would say is an important player for us. I would hardly call Murty and Ingi past their peak, and Hahnemann's a keeper so can go on forever (unless someone breaks his hands). Gunnarsson's been getting plenty of rest for the last couple of seasons..!
If you're counting Seol as OUT then you need to count any rumoured signings as IN, such as Rosenior and Fae. And Possibly one more winger.
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Aug 2007 15:21
Schards#2 Long Term Injuries - Sonko, Convey, Little
Schards#2 Past peak - Murty, Little, Ingemarsson, Hahnemann, Gunnarsson, all good players but will get slower and more injury prone from here on in.
by sheshnu » 02 Aug 2007 15:23
by sheshnu » 02 Aug 2007 15:26
Royal Lady So you'd agree that Convey is a LONG TERM injury then, just as he said. I doubt Murty and Ingi will play every game this season as, like it or not, they're getting older and any injuries will take longer to get over, as Murty has already proved in the past. Hahnemann has looked dodgy a few times last season, he may go on longer than outfield players, but not if his form is suffering.
by Royal Lady » 02 Aug 2007 15:27
by Schards#2 » 02 Aug 2007 15:30
sheshnuSchards#2 Long Term Injuries - Sonko, Convey, Little
Past peak - Murty, Little, Ingemarsson, Hahnemann, Gunnarsson, all good players but will get slower and more injury prone from here on in.
Squad - Sidwell, Seol (seemingly) OUT, Cisse Duberry IN
We didn't have Convey for large parts of last season either, nor Kitson who I would say is an important player for us. I would hardly call Murty and Ingi past their peak, and Hahnemann's a keeper so can go on forever (unless someone breaks his hands). Gunnarsson's been getting plenty of rest for the last couple of seasons..!
If you're counting Seol as OUT then you need to count any rumoured signings as IN, such as Rosenior and Fae. And Possibly one more winger.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 255 guests