http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~1188468,00.html
"But with eleven James Harpers you wouldn't go far wrong"
by Aly Murty » 12 Dec 2007 10:31
"But with eleven James Harpers you wouldn't go far wrong"
by Barry the bird boggler » 12 Dec 2007 10:34
by West Stand Flash » 12 Dec 2007 10:53
by Old Biscuitman » 12 Dec 2007 10:57
by biscuitsrus » 12 Dec 2007 11:10
Old Biscuitman We'll need a team of 121 players to satisfy SC soon.
by Bucks Dave » 12 Dec 2007 11:40
by biscuitsrus » 12 Dec 2007 11:49
Bucks Dave We already have 21,000 no. 13s.
by Ian Royal » 12 Dec 2007 12:27
Barry the bird boggler I always thought it was either a team of Kevin Doyles or a set of Philip Parkinsons. Now we have to come to terms with 11 James Harpers or Stephen Hunts as well.
by Kwacka » 12 Dec 2007 13:09
by West Stand Flash » 12 Dec 2007 13:31
Kwacka Eleven James Harpers would make an interesting game, no tackling, no passing forwards only sideways or back. How would goalie James take goal kicks, he'd have to keep kicking out for a corner.
by SpaceCruiser » 12 Dec 2007 13:33
West Stand FlashKwacka Eleven James Harpers would make an interesting game, no tackling, no passing forwards only sideways or back. How would goalie James take goal kicks, he'd have to keep kicking out for a corner.
TWAT
by southbank1871 » 12 Dec 2007 13:33
West Stand FlashKwacka Eleven James Harpers would make an interesting game, no tackling, no passing forwards only sideways or back. How would goalie James take goal kicks, he'd have to keep kicking out for a corner.
TWAT
by floyd__streete » 12 Dec 2007 13:40
by Maguire » 12 Dec 2007 13:45
Kwacka Eleven James Harpers would make an interesting game, no tackling, no passing forwards only sideways or back. How would goalie James take goal kicks, he'd have to keep kicking out for a corner.
by Skyline » 12 Dec 2007 14:44
Aly Murty Following on from his comment about having eleven Stephen Hunts in the team, Coppell has now decided eleven James Harpers would be quite good too.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~1188468,00.html"But with eleven James Harpers you wouldn't go far wrong"
by wolsey » 12 Dec 2007 15:09
SkylineAly Murty Following on from his comment about having eleven Stephen Hunts in the team, Coppell has now decided eleven James Harpers would be quite good too.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~1188468,00.html"But with eleven James Harpers you wouldn't go far wrong"
You don't think maybe the opposition would object to us having 22 players on the pitch?
by Old Biscuitman » 12 Dec 2007 16:31
by Kwacka » 12 Dec 2007 17:58
West Stand FlashKwacka Eleven James Harpers would make an interesting game, no tackling, no passing forwards only sideways or back. How would goalie James take goal kicks, he'd have to keep kicking out for a corner.
TWAT
by Compo's Hat » 12 Dec 2007 18:35
Kwacka Eleven James Harpers would make an interesting game, no tackling, no passing forwards only sideways or back. How would goalie James take goal kicks, he'd have to keep kicking out for a corner.
by shadesrwrf » 12 Dec 2007 18:38
SkylineAly Murty Following on from his comment about having eleven Stephen Hunts in the team, Coppell has now decided eleven James Harpers would be quite good too.
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~1188468,00.html"But with eleven James Harpers you wouldn't go far wrong"
You don't think maybe the opposition would object to us having 22 players on the pitch?
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, 72 bus, Royals and Racers and 270 guests