by Royal With Cheese » 23 Nov 2008 10:14
by Sir Rodney Effing » 23 Nov 2008 10:27
Royal With Cheese It's nice to see some mearured posting rather than the knee jerk reactions of some nobbers after yesterdays game.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Nov 2008 10:29
by jonboy » 23 Nov 2008 10:33
by Pat Butchers Ring » 23 Nov 2008 10:34
Southampton were one of the few teams to come to Reading and try and pass the ball about, and just like against Doncaster and the second half against Swansea we truly struggled. Some of their movement, passing and little flicks were a joy to behold and they were a class above us all game.
Luckily for Kebe, as long as Rosenior is playing he won't be the worst player on the pitch; England's right back was atrocious in every department again today, if only he could play football half as well as he talks to the media
by 79Royal » 23 Nov 2008 11:29
Pat Butchers RingSouthampton were one of the few teams to come to Reading and try and pass the ball about, and just like against Doncaster and the second half against Swansea we truly struggled. Some of their movement, passing and little flicks were a joy to behold and they were a class above us all game.
by loyalroyal4life » 23 Nov 2008 12:15
Skin It's fooball. We're bound to lose occasionally. We're still top 3. With plenty of the season left. What's the problem?
by floyd__streete » 23 Nov 2008 13:12
Einstein agogo we had players away on international duty and this always happens following international games... don't know why BUT i feel there is now a psychological effect on the players such that they have already lost( in their minds ) before the game kicks off.
by winchester_royal » 23 Nov 2008 13:19
floyd__streeteEinstein agogo we had players away on international duty and this always happens following international games... don't know why BUT i feel there is now a psychological effect on the players such that they have already lost( in their minds ) before the game kicks off.
Amd that 'psychological effect' is none other than our management team.
Reading manager Steve Coppell:
"We never do well after an international break."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 727305.stm
We never do well after an international break, this apparently is something which Coppell disappointingly seems to accept as fact. Why do we never do well after an international break? Because the management bang on about it so much. We had Coppell complaining about long trips after internationals last season and even Kevin Dillon has stuck his oar in on the subject already this season. That is your 'psychological effect'. Did every other team who had players playing in international friendlies during the week struggle this weekend? No, of course they bloody didn't.
by Dirk Gently » 23 Nov 2008 13:34
by winchester_royal » 23 Nov 2008 13:42
Dirk Gently Has no-one ever stopped to think that no team in the world can be expected to be in the right frame of mind for a match in the same week that a 13-year-old team mate, a member of the "Reading Family" was killed.
The tribute to Stewart was truly moving and the emotion got to thousands in the stands and no doubt to the players too - they are people too, with emotions - not just the automations you get on Championship Manager.
So I defy anyone to go out and play relaxed, silky football after that , and I'm pretty relaxed about yesterday's defeat.
by readingbedding » 23 Nov 2008 13:50
by earleyroyal » 23 Nov 2008 13:52
floyd__streete Well maybe that thrashing today will do us some favours in the long term. We're not Brazil - we were closer to being Barnet today - so we were never going to go through the long season unbeaten at home in such a competitive league. It might bring some amongst us down to earth too; three wins on the spin had already toasting promotion it seemed and some of the fanciful predictions on another thread belied Southampton's good away form and the fact that we simply aint nowehere near as good as some of you think we are.
Southampton were one of the few teams to come to Reading and try and pass the ball about, and just like against Doncaster and the second half against Swansea we truly struggled. Some of their movement, passing and little flicks were a joy to behold and they were a class above us all game. No complaints at all today - the referee performed well and Southampton played honestly and openly. My only reservations tonight are with the management; Harper on for 80 anonymous minutes? No half time changes having been played off the park in an ineffective opening 45 minutes? Long on for half an hour of the usual honest endeavour with negligible quality? The players can take a look at themselves too; Hahnemann inexplicably failing to come for the first cross for the opening goal for instance, Bikey's showboating bordering on sloppiness. And there is a complete absence of leaders on the pitch for Reading when things go badly wrong as they did today. Not good to watch, but a timely reminder that we aren't head and shoulders above this division like we were 3 years ago.
I fail to see why Jimmy Kebe is hyped up so much to be honest. From a winger you want end product and I cannot recall a single decent cross from him today. Sure, he's pacy but he runs himself down blind alleys and struggles to stay on his feet half the time; if you want to watch a pacy athlete go to Crystal Palace for the sprints, give me a footballer like Glenn Little every time. Luckily for Kebe, as long as Rosenior is playing he won't be the worst player on the pitch; England's right back was atrocious in every department again today, if only he could play football half as well as he talks to the media. Our right side today failed throughout ninety minutes with the exception of any unusually accurate finish at the end of some excellent work by the industrious Doyle who was a class above anything else we had today.
This season was always going to be one of transition and I comfortable and satisfied with where we are the moment. We will finish in the top six and we will win many more than we lose, which is a pretty decent effort. Our squad is a decent one at this level but would we cope in the Premier League? Absolutely not, this isn't remotely as good a side as the one we had three years ago - James Harper's performances, for instance, show what a good player Steve Sidwell was/is. Wolves are pulling away and the difference between us and Birmingham is that when they are 2-1 down their impact sub is Kevin Phllips. And ours is Shane Long.
by RoyalBlue » 23 Nov 2008 13:53
Dirk Gently Has no-one ever stopped to think that no team in the world can be expected to be in the right frame of mind for a match in the same week that a 13-year-old team mate, a member of the "Reading Family" was killed.
The tribute to Stewart was truly moving and the emotion got to thousands in the stands and no doubt to the players too - they are people too, with emotions - not just the automations you get on Championship Manager.
So I defy anyone to go out and play relaxed, silky football after that , and I'm pretty relaxed about yesterday's defeat.
by Victor Meldrew » 23 Nov 2008 13:57
floyd__streeteEinstein agogo we had players away on international duty and this always happens following international games... don't know why BUT i feel there is now a psychological effect on the players such that they have already lost( in their minds ) before the game kicks off.
Amd that 'psychological effect' is none other than our management team.
Reading manager Steve Coppell:
"We never do well after an international break."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 727305.stm
We never do well after an international break, this apparently is something which Coppell disappointingly seems to accept as fact. Why do we never do well after an international break? Because the management bang on about it so much. We had Coppell complaining about long trips after internationals last season and even Kevin Dillon has stuck his oar in on the subject already this season. That is your 'psychological effect'. Did every other team who had players playing in international friendlies during the week struggle this weekend? No, of course they bloody didn't.
by Ian Royal » 23 Nov 2008 13:59
PieEater I didn't mind losing today, but what really surprised me was what a good team Southampton were, they played us off the park. Quite why they are down near the bottom of the division is a mystery if they can play like that.
When we got back into it and had some momentum they just kept the ball, pass after pass, and throw in after throw in until our frustration showed and we just gave the ball back to them.
Their tactics stifled our wingers, and then we look like an ordinary team with fragile confidence that is incapable of making the simplest pass.
Having said that, Doyler could of equalised it with this free header at the end, but in fairness that would have been a travesty given how we'd played.
by readingbedding » 23 Nov 2008 14:00
Dirk Gently Has no-one ever stopped to think that no team in the world can be expected to be in the right frame of mind for a match in the same week that a 13-year-old team mate, a member of the "Reading Family" was killed.
The tribute to Stewart was truly moving and the emotion got to thousands in the stands and no doubt to the players too - they are people too, with emotions - not just the automations you get on Championship Manager.
So I defy anyone to go out and play relaxed, silky football after that , and I'm pretty relaxed about yesterday's defeat.
by floyd__streete » 23 Nov 2008 14:02
Dirk Gently Has no-one ever stopped to think that no team in the world can be expected to be in the right frame of mind for a match in the same week that a 13-year-old team mate, a member of the "Reading Family" was killed.
readingbedding The various managers of other clubs enthusing about our footballing prowess in this division surely must give the more fickle, ignorant and emotional RFC fans a clue of how we are perceived and rated within this league.
We're going up!
by readingbedding » 23 Nov 2008 14:02
Ian RoyalPieEater I didn't mind losing today, but what really surprised me was what a good team Southampton were, they played us off the park. Quite why they are down near the bottom of the division is a mystery if they can play like that.
When we got back into it and had some momentum they just kept the ball, pass after pass, and throw in after throw in until our frustration showed and we just gave the ball back to them.
Their tactics stifled our wingers, and then we look like an ordinary team with fragile confidence that is incapable of making the simplest pass.
Having said that, Doyler could of equalised it with this free header at the end, but in fairness that would have been a travesty given how we'd played.
The reason they're at the bottom is because they can't do that every week. Remember last season, or the season we got relegated before that. We were quite capable of playing teams off the park. We just couldn't do it more than a couple of times in the season. Saints had a fairly decent away record as well iirc.
by readingbedding » 23 Nov 2008 14:05
floyd__streeteDirk Gently Has no-one ever stopped to think that no team in the world can be expected to be in the right frame of mind for a match in the same week that a 13-year-old team mate, a member of the "Reading Family" was killed.
I wondered who might be first to bring this up! The Reading senior players would never have met this lad, and the first hand accounts of the following thread would suggest that they weren't exactly in emotional turmoil over the sad news: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=82453readingbedding The various managers of other clubs enthusing about our footballing prowess in this division surely must give the more fickle, ignorant and emotional RFC fans a clue of how we are perceived and rated within this league.
We're going up!
I can recall the likes of Arsene Wenger and Alex Ferguson stating that Reading wouldn't go down last season. But then, I'd never expect you to see the bigger picture, Reading Bedding.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 249 guests