by LoyalRoyalFan » 02 May 2009 21:13
by Millsy » 02 May 2009 21:22
by dellwoodboy » 02 May 2009 21:30
by alton-royal » 02 May 2009 21:31
by South London Royal » 02 May 2009 23:46
londiniumSouth London Royal Reading 2 Brum 1
Karacan (25) Phillips (89)
Kitson (90+2)
Palace 1 Sheff Utd 1
Kuqi (86) Halford (62)
Fukc off Newbie
where in South London are you mate?
by rotherwick_royal » 03 May 2009 11:47
South London RoyallondiniumSouth London Royal Reading 2 Brum 1
Karacan (25) Phillips (89)
Kitson (90+2)
Palace 1 Sheff Utd 1
Kuqi (86) Halford (62)
Fukc off Newbie
where in South London are you mate?
Thanks for the warm welcome! I live in Clapham. How about you?
by Alivey » 04 May 2009 01:08
by Cookie » 04 May 2009 01:13
Alivey Here it is, the chance for quite a few Reading fans to officially apologise to Neil Warnock and show just a fraction of the integrity this man has.
Suggestions that he would field a weakened team were predictably wide of the mark, just as the Blades knew all along. Not only that but Palace fought for every ball as if their life's depended on it and this was no doubt down to Warnock himself.
As it turned out the result was immaterial as Birmingham got the win they needed but that's not the point. The point is wild accusations were thrown around and I think that those responsible should be big enough to admit they got the man wrong.
Love him or hate him, Neil Warnock has integrity, and if certain fellow top flight managers had some of the same the game wouldn't be the joke that it sometimes is.
Well done Birmingham City, great result today.
by Pseud O'Nym » 04 May 2009 01:18
Alivey as if their life's depended on it
by Cookie » 04 May 2009 01:27
Alivey Here it is, the chance for quite a few Reading fans to officially apologise to Neil Warnock and show just a fraction of the integrity this man has.
Suggestions that he would field a weakened team were predictably wide of the mark, just as the Blades knew all along. Not only that but Palace fought for every ball as if their life's depended on it and this was no doubt down to Warnock himself.
As it turned out the result was immaterial as Birmingham got the win they needed but that's not the point. The point is wild accusations were thrown around and I think that those responsible should be big enough to admit they got the man wrong.
Love him or hate him, Neil Warnock has integrity, and if certain fellow top flight managers had some of the same the game wouldn't be the joke that it sometimes is.
Well done Birmingham City, great result today.
by Millsy » 04 May 2009 01:51
Alivey Love him or hate him, Neil Warnock has integrity, and if certain fellow top flight managers had some of the same the game wouldn't be the joke that it sometimes is.
Well done Birmingham City, great result today.
by Snowball » 04 May 2009 16:54
Turns8Snowball Palace haven't done that badly versus 7 of the top 8 teams
W2 D3 L2 4-5
0-1 Wolves
0-2 Cardiff
0-0 Reading
0-0 Birmingham
0-0 Burnley
2-1 Preston
2-1 Swansea
That just looks like a load of numbers to me....
by Snowball » 04 May 2009 16:55
CMRoyalSnowball Palace haven't done that badly versus 7 of the top 8 teams
W2 D3 L2 4-5
0-1 Wolves
0-2 Cardiff
0-0 Reading
0-0 Birmingham
0-0 Burnley
2-1 Preston
2-1 Swansea
Past performance isn't necessarily indicative of future results, of course. In fact, this season in this division it's amost impossible to predict what might happen next.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 207 guests