by IceRoyalsandKDoyles » 03 May 2009 21:52
by Chaney » 03 May 2009 22:04
The Real Sandhurst Royal
Kebe and Hunt had no idea. Thye were unable to create or deliver a decent cross beteween them.
Kitson plays like a lost sheep all over the place except where he should be in the 6 yards box to poach and score goals.
by Blue Biscuit » 03 May 2009 22:08
by lovetoscore » 03 May 2009 22:12
by AthleticoSpizz » 03 May 2009 22:18
deary deary melovetoscore Oh Silly me-
Must have missed Kitson winning loads of headers against their cbs and all the good lay offs and shots on target then? Rumour has it that some strikers actually do this
So your definition of a player getting into the game is whether he has a head injury or not and whether the ref gives decisions against him then?
Well that must make you a very high calibre fan oh great one!AthleticoSpizzYou silly billylovetoscore Kitson-5-rarely got in the game
Downed at least twice by the Brum with head injuries, penalised by the pathetic ref Webb at least 3 times for winning challenges fairly.
at the end of most of our poorly skied passes
....and yet he rarely got into the game...![]()
oh dear, is the calibre of "fan" that we have know?
by Blue Biscuit » 03 May 2009 22:19
by Murts-is-Lej » 03 May 2009 22:44
royalexile Whinger(!!)?
by Rex » 03 May 2009 22:52
by reading fc rock leroylero » 03 May 2009 22:52
abell Yes I'm not happy that we could have won it but we came up against a better side on the day. BC just seemed to handle the occasion better, as most away teams seem to have done at the Mad Stad in 2009. And there was no way we could blame the pitch given that we very rarely passed the ball on it! So here's how the players rated when you were being influenced by 24,000 other people rather than just a bored looking wife doing the ironing:
USA - 5 had very to do little apart from make the biggest howler of his season!
Bikey - 5 seemed to think the ball boys were playing as he kept passing to them...
Doobs - 6 pretty solid but didn't get close to Phillips when it mattered
Harding - 6 defence was OK but didn't offer much on the overlap
Rossy - 7 tried bit harder on overlap than Harding but nothing much came off (except the one everyone missed)
Tabb - 8 worked really hard in midfield especially in the second half when he was covering the back 4/3
Karacan - 6 closed down pretty well but was missing the telling balls
SHunt - 6 worked hard as usual but didn't get the ball past the 1st defender often enough
Kebe - 6 seemed too afraid of taking anyone on
GWinger - 6 ran around a lot (mainly off the ball) but none of it was very effective
Long - 7 ran his heart out but didn't get much change from a couple of good CBs
Tofsky - 9 actually saw him tackle back as well as the usual good passing. Goal capped an excellent display
Doyler - 6 well marshalled out of the game, not exactly an impact sub
by IceRoyalsandKDoyles » 03 May 2009 22:57
by Royal Rother » 03 May 2009 23:00
oxf*rd hell!
Bikey a 5!? He was MOTM!
by reading fc rock leroylero » 04 May 2009 00:20
by Royal Rother » 04 May 2009 00:48
by Royal Boil » 04 May 2009 02:08
abell Yes I'm not happy that we could have won it but we came up against a better side on the day. BC just seemed to handle the occasion better, as most away teams seem to have done at the Mad Stad in 2009. And there was no way we could blame the pitch given that we very rarely passed the ball on it! So here's how the players rated when you were being influenced by 24,000 other people rather than just a bored looking wife doing the ironing:
USA - 5 had very to do little apart from make the biggest howler of his season!
Bikey - 5 seemed to think the ball boys were playing as he kept passing to them...
Doobs - 6 pretty solid but didn't get close to Phillips when it mattered
Harding - 6 defence was OK but didn't offer much on the overlap
Rossy - 7 tried bit harder on overlap than Harding but nothing much came off (except the one everyone missed)
Tabb - 8 worked really hard in midfield especially in the second half when he was covering the back 4/3
Karacan - 6 closed down pretty well but was missing the telling balls
SHunt - 6 worked hard as usual but didn't get the ball past the 1st defender often enough
Kebe - 6 seemed too afraid of taking anyone on
GWinger - 6 ran around a lot (mainly off the ball) but none of it was very effective
Long - 7 ran his heart out but didn't get much change from a couple of good CBs
Tofsky - 9 actually saw him tackle back as well as the usual good passing. Goal capped an excellent display
Doyler - 6 well marshalled out of the game, not exactly an impact sub
by cmonurz » 04 May 2009 02:13
by Arch » 04 May 2009 03:18
SLAMMED I've posted 4000+ times and i still dont get any respect
by Rex » 04 May 2009 04:45
by loyalroyal4life » 04 May 2009 10:09
Blue Biscuit One other thing....I thought the referee was poor. Not particularly biased...just inconsistent.
by RoyalBlue » 04 May 2009 12:20
by PlasticRoyale » 04 May 2009 12:24
RoyalBlue From NOTW:
"Blues goalkeeper Maik Taylor, 37, heads back to Reading ready to make them pay for rejecting him at the start of career. Taylor (below) was in the army at the time and playing non-league football for Farnborough when he was invited to Reading for a trial.
He recalled: "I was only there for a week and they decided not to pursue their interest in me. I had followed my dad into the army and I was 19 before I played in goal for the first time. And that was by accident."
Well he certainly made us pay with thatgreat save from Marek. Had that shot gone in, I genuinely think we would have been celebrating getting back to the PL today. Having been pulled back from 2-0 to 2-2 Brummie nerves really would have kicked in, whereas with the Mad Stad crowd roaring them on, I think our players would have gone on to grab the winner.
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 248 guests