Are you glad Madejski's running this club?

[rhroyal]

Right, so much debate about everything, so lets make it simple. Are you pleased Madejski is our Chairman (for now). Would you like to see us take more risks and spend more in the transfer markets? Would you like to Rodgers' job under review if we're still not firing in a month or so's time? If yes, Madejski is not the right chairman for you.

If you're glad we definitely won't be near any sort of financial ruin, vote for Madejski. If you think a new manager and new team shouldn't be expected to be world beaters after 6 games, vote for Madejski.

I can't be bothered to write my reasons again, but I'm very happy that we have a level headed man at the helm and will have no complaints so long as he is at the club. He wants us to succeed, he's just not going to break his own or the club's bank in the process. If a Sheikh with billions of pounds comes in I would be happy enough though, so long as he didn't get bored after a few years and leave us in a mess. However, as a human club who have to make their own resources and live within their means, I think Madejski is the right man.

[Archie's penalty]

In general, yes.

[bottom left hand corner]

He has keep the club running well financially, but if he pumped more money into the club whilst we was in the premier league we could still be there!

[Dirk Gently]

He has keep the club running well financially, but if he pumped more money into the club whilst we was in the premier league we could still be there!

Yet again, the moeny was there and it wasn't JM who didn't spend it.

[Ian Royal]

Yep, happy with his running of the club.

[brendywendy]

ecstatic

the booing of him of him last season was shameful IMO

[rhroyal]

Well I'm glad that 83% of people on here so far can see sense.

[REALROYAL]

I have to say NO!! Sir John has done more than words can say for our club. We might not have a club if it wasnt for him. However we all know he has taken us as far as he can. We need money spent on the team so he needs to sell up

[Mid Sussex Royal]

It depends on who bought the club.

I would not be in favour of a mega bucks overseas investor as we would lose our identity to some extent and clubs like Chelsea and now Man City do not appear to be well liked by other fans or the press in general - I used to rate Mark Hughes but he sounds like a right pr1ck now.

If someone, say local, made an offer with the interests of the club/town etc at heart (like Dave Whelan) then no problem with me.

[RoyalBlue]

Maybe at the time he saw the benefits to himself of running the club, was fully committed and enjoying the fame and plaudits that it brought.

Now he's made it clear he wants out and is preoccupied with cutting his cloth, the sooner he goes the better.

Reduce the debt of the club, by paying off loans, thus making it more attractive to sell - he wins both ways! The losers are the fans, many of whom I would suggest spend a greater percentage of their disposable income on supporting the club.

[SLAMMED]

No.