John Madejski's WalletLoyalRoyalFan The people around me booed, myself included.
Bit of a tw*t then aren't we?
I'm entitled to boo. To be fair, I have been supported Rodgers so far.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 27 Sep 2009 19:38
John Madejski's WalletLoyalRoyalFan The people around me booed, myself included.
Bit of a tw*t then aren't we?
by Ian Royal » 27 Sep 2009 19:48
by weybridgewanderer » 27 Sep 2009 20:06
by Terminal Boardom » 27 Sep 2009 22:14
winchester_royalWest Stand Flashwinchester_royal Howard is in the team because he is a techninally decent player who is looking to go forward everytime he is on the ball.
Struggled yesterday because he was asked to play in an unfamilar defensive position.
Can I ask what he has done since he's been at the club, apart from give away possession on numerous occasions & look VERY slow?
Admittedly he hasn't done much yet, but I have been fairly impressed with what I've seen.
by Terminal Boardom » 27 Sep 2009 22:17
Bucks Dave Confidence.
Rodgers and I seem to be at odds on this. Rodgers said that it is a sign of our confidence that we go one up and then relax. Where on earth does that confidence come from?
by RoyalBlue » 27 Sep 2009 22:27
winchester_royalIan Royal Cummings - good signing
Mills - good signing
O'Dea - excellent loan signing
Bertrand - good loan signing
McAnuff - good signing
Howard - poor signing
Rasiak - poor signing
Not bad. Bit of a defensive theme going on there. Shame our major problems have been in attack the last year or two.
On the basis of yesterday you can't honestly say Ras is a bad signing.
Shat all over Twatford's defense in the first half.
by Ian Royal » 27 Sep 2009 22:31
winchester_royalIan Royal Cummings - good signing
Mills - good signing
O'Dea - excellent loan signing
Bertrand - good loan signing
McAnuff - good signing
Howard - poor signing
Rasiak - poor signing
Not bad. Bit of a defensive theme going on there. Shame our major problems have been in attack the last year or two.
On the basis of yesterday you can't honestly say Ras is a bad signing.
Shat all over Twatford's defense in the first half.
by Jerry St Clair » 27 Sep 2009 22:35
LoyalRoyalFan The people around me booed, myself included.
by SLAMMED » 27 Sep 2009 22:43
by Super_horns » 27 Sep 2009 23:03
Ian RoyalZacNaloen Watford fans were terrible and celebrated a draw as if they'd just beat us 6-0. I won't be taking them seriously if you don't mind.
They were acting like they'd won a cup final on the way home as well. Bit pathetic really.
by Dirk Gently » 27 Sep 2009 23:04
Super_hornsIan RoyalZacNaloen Watford fans were terrible and celebrated a draw as if they'd just beat us 6-0. I won't be taking them seriously if you don't mind.
They were acting like they'd won a cup final on the way home as well. Bit pathetic really.
Only to wind your fans up about Rodgers.
Anyone else had been manager there'd probably only be about 800 of them.
by juanpablo » 28 Sep 2009 04:46
Ian Royalwinchester_royalIan Royal Cummings - good signing
Mills - good signing
O'Dea - excellent loan signing
Bertrand - good loan signing
McAnuff - good signing
Howard - poor signing
Rasiak - poor signing
Not bad. Bit of a defensive theme going on there. Shame our major problems have been in attack the last year or two.
On the basis of yesterday you can't honestly say Ras is a bad signing.
Shat all over Twatford's defense in the first half.
I'm not basing it on one performance against Watford though, but on several games. And he was much much better against Watford. He even looked semi-decent for the first 20 minutes. But in general he's been poor and about as threatening as a sponge.
by Wimb » 28 Sep 2009 11:20
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 28 Sep 2009 12:40
by ElmParker » 28 Sep 2009 12:42
winchester_royalWest Stand Flashwinchester_royal Howard is in the team because he is a techninally decent player who is looking to go forward everytime he is on the ball.
Struggled yesterday because he was asked to play in an unfamilar defensive position.
Can I ask what he has done since he's been at the club, apart from give away possession on numerous occasions & look VERY slow?
Admittedly he hasn't done much yet, but I have been fairly impressed with what I've seen.
by ElmParker » 28 Sep 2009 12:46
by dynamo380 » 28 Sep 2009 12:51
by Schards#2 » 28 Sep 2009 12:56
dynamo380 Definately 2 points dropped from a Watford perspective. Except for the first 10 minutes Reading werent in the game really. Good job we bought so many fans in the end, otherwise there wouldnt have been any sort of atmosphere in the ground. The home support was one of the worst ive seen in recent years and the only reason the booing at the end was so muted was because most of u have fecked off home 15 minutes previous. Which is odd, considering all u happy clappers on here thought it was a 3pt home banker lol
by ZacNaloen » 28 Sep 2009 12:56
dynamo380 Definately 2 points dropped from a Watford perspective. Except for the first 10 minutes Reading werent in the game really. Good job we bought so many fans in the end, otherwise there wouldnt have been any sort of atmosphere in the ground. The home support was one of the worst ive seen in recent years and the only reason the booing at the end was so muted was because most of u have fecked off home 15 minutes previous. Which is odd, considering all u happy clappers on here thought it was a 3pt home banker lol
by Stranded » 28 Sep 2009 13:03
Ideal BBC says Watford had 55% possession. Other sources has it as high as 59%.
And here I was, thinking we were the home team??
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Royal Ginger and 312 guests