Should a new keeper be a January priority?

juanpablo
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1010
Joined: 12 May 2004 17:50
Location: on a beach with jack johnson

Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by juanpablo » 18 Oct 2009 09:26

Clearly we have problems all over the park but if every point is going to be scrapped for can we trust A Fed?

Seems like a decent bloke that cares but if some of our less bright fans are going to welcome people like Bikey leaving because they cannot be trusted, how can we keep hold of Fed?

Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Barry the bird boggler » 18 Oct 2009 09:28

No, Feds is OK for this level and there are other priorities

Where The Fox Hat
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 20 Jun 2007 14:12

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Where The Fox Hat » 18 Oct 2009 09:46

You are having a laugh. Had you seen Feds are Preston in the second especially you wouldn't have made such a stupid statement. If it wasn't for him we would have lost even after being 2 - 0 up.

I think it could be a good idea though to bar Brendan from the dressing room at half time because it looks like his team talks are going to go down in Reading folk law :lol:

Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Barry the bird boggler » 18 Oct 2009 09:48

Spacey mode on

That's folk lore

Spacey mode off

juanpablo
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1010
Joined: 12 May 2004 17:50
Location: on a beach with jack johnson

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by juanpablo » 18 Oct 2009 09:58

Where The Fox Hat You are having a laugh. Had you seen Feds are Preston in the second especially you wouldn't have made such a stupid statement. If it wasn't for him we would have lost even after being 2 - 0 up.

I think it could be a good idea though to bar Brendan from the dressing room at half time because it looks like his team talks are going to go down in Reading folk law :lol:


He is a great keeper on form but could easily lose us as many games as he wins us (especially with us not scoring a lot)


User avatar
Rex
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5910
Joined: 15 Feb 2008 21:00
Location: Well this thread has been a rousing success.

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Rex » 18 Oct 2009 10:15

juanpablo
Where The Fox Hat You are having a laugh. Had you seen Feds are Preston in the second especially you wouldn't have made such a stupid statement. If it wasn't for him we would have lost even after being 2 - 0 up.

I think it could be a good idea though to bar Brendan from the dressing room at half time because it looks like his team talks are going to go down in Reading folk law :lol:


He is a great keeper on form but could easily lose us as many games as he wins us (especially with us not scoring a lot)


Really.

juanpablo
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1010
Joined: 12 May 2004 17:50
Location: on a beach with jack johnson

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by juanpablo » 18 Oct 2009 10:20

well id say 2 goals yesterday were completely his fault so there is 1 point

User avatar
North Somerset Royal
Member
Posts: 936
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 03:58
Location: Stuck on M4

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by North Somerset Royal » 18 Oct 2009 10:23

Whilst he arguably gave away two goals yesterday he also stopped at least 3 more with incredible saves. It would be nice to have someone more consistent but realistically we are not likely to get anyone better and there are more pressing needs in most other positions.

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12837
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by paultheroyal » 18 Oct 2009 10:26

Keeper position is fine, far more other worrying postions.

Right back.
Creative Midfielder.
2 goal scoring strikers.


The Real Sandhurst Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2160
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 10:06
Location: Sandhurst

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 18 Oct 2009 10:38

Nothing wrong with Fed's it the manager that is our problem.

royalsoldaten
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 03 Aug 2009 07:49

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by royalsoldaten » 18 Oct 2009 10:49

Great keeper? Has his moments, however he must communicate more with his defence...and stop coming to far off his line. This happened more than once yesterday, which was the cause of two goals....as happend against Watford a couple of weeks ago!

User avatar
Arnie_Pie
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1523
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 13:43
Location: Purple Turtle

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Arnie_Pie » 18 Oct 2009 10:51

I would have thought a decent goalscorer is far more of a priority.

User avatar
Far Canal
Member
Posts: 697
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 00:31
Location: Kennetside

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Far Canal » 18 Oct 2009 10:56

The problem with Fed is he's only 25. Keepers are no good until they're 28. Only three years to wait.


1871royals
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 08:57

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by 1871royals » 18 Oct 2009 10:59

I think Feds will be a good keeper in the future. In our predicament we can’t afford a GK to be making mistakes.

So many goals have provided question marks over his ability. Cardiff (h), Peterborough (a) beaten at his near post. Watford (h) didn’t come of his line. Yesterday 1st and 3rd goal his fault. The defence does not look confident with him behind it.

He is a great shot stopper, but that’s his job to make saves. A GK is judged on their mistakes and at this age he’s making too many.

An experienced loanee is needed. Maybe USA? :wink: 8)

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Terminal Boardom » 18 Oct 2009 11:36

A goalkeeper is only as good as the players in front of him. That said, going walkabout is hardly going to instil any confidence in the players in front of him.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11777
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by RoyalBlue » 18 Oct 2009 12:34

Don't have to wait till January do we?

Nor do I think we should.

Terminal Boardom A goalkeeper is only as good as the players in front of him. That said, going walkabout is hardly going to instil any confidence in the players in front of him.


Disagree, I've seen some very good keepers behind some pretty poor teams - it's when they get the chance to really shine!

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11831
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Dirk Gently » 18 Oct 2009 12:39

Adam Liability is a great shot-stopper, but that's not enough - his positional sense and judgement are both absolutely dire.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Ian Royal » 18 Oct 2009 12:39

Don't think we actually need that much, if anything. I think th esquad on the whole is fine. I just want rid of Rodgers and someone who can use them to come in.

A fullback, a striker, a box to box/defensive midfielder (if we continue to play 5 in midfield) and a winger would be my ideal shopping list. The striker is the only absolute must if we continue with 1 up front.

LoyalRoyalFan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4942
Joined: 20 Jan 2008 10:18
Location: Reading

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by LoyalRoyalFan » 18 Oct 2009 13:11

A new manager might be a start.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Should a new keeper be a January priority?

by Wycombe Royal » 18 Oct 2009 13:34

A keeper can be great for 95% of the match and make lots of good saves but if he makes two mistakes and costs us 2 goals then we are always going to struggle to win matches.

Unfortunately for Federici he is making too many simple mistakes revolving around his decision making and taking of crosses. So he can make 25 excellent saves during a game (that probably most other keepers would make) but if he makes 2 wrong decisions then those saves are irrelevant.

And this isn't just a one-off. He has made quite a lot of bad mistakes and Hamer needs to be given a go.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Clyde1998, From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot], Gunny Fishcake, LUX, Richard, Royality creeps In, Snowflake Royal, st george, stealthpapes, Sutekh and 309 guests

It is currently 23 Nov 2024 16:44