by themadstad » 30 Aug 2010 18:35
by Gordons Cumming » 30 Aug 2010 18:36
Royal Lady No one has even considered how this is going to affect Simon Church.
by Finch » 30 Aug 2010 18:36
Schards#2Super Kevin Bremner! I wonder if there's a chance the deal will involve them loaning him back to us straight away? By all accounts they have sold a decent midfielder and already shelled out on another new one. Could happen I suppose.....
The definition of ambition by the way is 'an earnest desire for some type of achievement'.
The definition of achievement is 'something that is accomplished'.
IF financial security for the football club is the desired achievement, then by default we are an ambitious club.
That comes across as really mardy I know, but it's not meant to be, it's just my lateral thinking that get's me frustrated when the word ambition is thrown around.
As a fan, I want to be entertained and I want to see success. I am not excited or entertained by an impressive balance sheet. If I was, I would support a FTSE 100 company and break out the rumblestix at the AGM.
Maybe the club's ambitions and mine are hopelessly out of kilter. I could live with selling off Premiership big money players to build a young side from the acadamy, but now it's clear we are simply going to flog off the best of these as soon as they can command a decent fee, i'm increasingly asking myself what is the point?
by Gordons Cumming » 30 Aug 2010 18:37
themadstad I'd like to know when the club are going to post it up on the OS!
by Royal Lady » 30 Aug 2010 18:37
by toppy » 30 Aug 2010 18:37
themadstad I'd like to know when the club are going to post it up on the OS!
by Row Z Royal » 30 Aug 2010 18:38
Royal Lady It's going to affect his game - mark my words.
by Chaney » 30 Aug 2010 18:38
themadstad I'd like to know when the club are going to post it up on the OS!
by Tilehurst End » 30 Aug 2010 18:39
Row Z RoyalRoyal Lady It's going to affect his game - mark my words.
Might stay onside more often without The Sig's length shoving him past the last man all the time.
by pea » 30 Aug 2010 18:39
by dantheloyalroyal » 30 Aug 2010 18:40
by working class hero » 30 Aug 2010 18:41
If you read the report on the official Reading fc site, it says that STAR don't like these meetings to be reported on
by Gordons Cumming » 30 Aug 2010 18:44
working class heroIf you read the report on the official Reading fc site, it says that STAR don't like these meetings to be reported on
STAR were asked by the Club to restrict their own reporting of fora - and to ask the fans to limit reporting..... so this is sophistry of the first water! And why STAR agreed to be censored is puzzling...
by Victor Meldrew » 30 Aug 2010 18:45
Royal Lady It's going to affect his game - mark my words.
by Big Foot » 30 Aug 2010 18:45
brendywendy AND GET THAT GUY WHO TORE US TO SHREDS FROM NORTHHAMPTON THE OTHER DAY TOO!
by SLAMMED » 30 Aug 2010 18:48
by Cookie » 30 Aug 2010 18:48
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 30 Aug 2010 18:49
by SLAMMED » 30 Aug 2010 18:50
by Readingfanman » 30 Aug 2010 18:51
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Kev Royal and 231 guests