SJM interview with BBC

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Ian Royal » 10 May 2011 18:48

adamh4608 anyone got a link to the SJM interview please


Would you like us to wipe your arse for you as well?

loyalroyal4life
Ian Royal
Maguire Depressing stuff though.

Come on Sheikh Al-Bin Laden, come and put us out of our misery.


I don't find it depressing. It's reality and it's exactly the same as we've been living with for at least the last three seasons.



Have to agree with this, it will continue to be the same until we have new ownership


Oh woe is us, top 10 finishes for ever more and two play offs for every three seasons. :roll:

User avatar
No Hoops
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1098
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:42

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by No Hoops » 10 May 2011 18:56

Is this interview from last year!! :D

adamh4608
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 09:10

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by adamh4608 » 10 May 2011 18:59

Ian Royal
adamh4608 anyone got a link to the SJM interview please


Would you like us to wipe your arse for you as well?

[quote="loyalroyal4life"][quote="Ian Royal"][quote="Maguire"]Depressing stuff though.


as i was busy buying my ticket to GO and watch reading.. At least i go to games wa*ker
and dont sit there moaning like you.

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12283
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Maguire » 10 May 2011 19:00

Ian Royal Oh woe is us, top 10 finishes for ever more and two play offs for every three seasons. :roll:


doesn't really work like that, does it?

You can't claim finishing third with a team stacked with Prem players who have just been relegated is a predictor of future seasons

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Ian Royal » 10 May 2011 19:05

Maguire
Ian Royal Oh woe is us, top 10 finishes for ever more and two play offs for every three seasons. :roll:


doesn't really work like that, does it?

You can't claim finishing third with a team stacked with Prem players who have just been relegated is a predictor of future seasons


4th Mags, I think I'd be safe in saying most getting relegated do worse. And I'm not the one predicting we'll be getting the same until we get a new investor... just pointing out that would hardly be a bad thing now would it...


User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by FiNeRaIn » 10 May 2011 19:16

roadrunner Surely we have kicked most of the debt after promotion into touch by now?
.


Yeah, its laughable honestly. " things will have to change' - yes they will, you can reinvest some of the 30million we've already received for doyle, kitston, sonko, shorey, sig, matejovsky, bikey, cox( after his sell on fee) and henry, not to mention the massive drop in wages. We are not taking anymore of this selling and not replacing nonsense, things will have to change by us actually investing and showing some ambition for a change, so he's quite right.

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12283
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Maguire » 10 May 2011 19:28

Ian Royal
Maguire
Ian Royal Oh woe is us, top 10 finishes for ever more and two play offs for every three seasons. :roll:


doesn't really work like that, does it?

You can't claim finishing third with a team stacked with Prem players who have just been relegated is a predictor of future seasons


4th Mags, I think I'd be safe in saying most getting relegated do worse. And I'm not the one predicting we'll be getting the same until we get a new investor... just pointing out that would hardly be a bad thing now would it...


3rd, 4th, whatevs. Your post implies that we're going to carry on getting in the top 6 in two out of three seasons even if we sell our best players. i don't think we will.

Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Royalee » 10 May 2011 19:34

CayeneMatt So in the interview he says ...

"If we don't make it to the promised land then things will have to change but that's the nature of the beast I'm afraid."


Here's to hoping - I hope he f*cks off.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Ian Royal » 10 May 2011 19:43

Maguire
Ian Royal
Maguire You can't claim finishing third with a team stacked with Prem players who have just been relegated is a predictor of future seasons


4th Mags, I think I'd be safe in saying most getting relegated do worse. And I'm not the one predicting we'll be getting the same until we get a new investor... just pointing out that would hardly be a bad thing now would it...


3rd, 4th, whatevs. Your post implies that we're going to carry on getting in the top 6 in two out of three seasons even if we sell our best players. i don't think we will.


You seem to be failing to understand I'm not saying we'll do anything like the sort... I'm being sarcastic at an STG.


User avatar
Tamworth_Royal
Member
Posts: 822
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 19:42
Location: She's got a tongue like an electric eel and she likes the taste of a man's tonsils.

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Tamworth_Royal » 10 May 2011 19:47

Brillaint Madejski, what timing you have to start blurting that old crap 3 days before a play-off semi :roll: talk about it in June eh

Club needed £4m start of season to cover costs, sold Sigi £8m plus, had a good cup run and will receive parachute bonus of £ ? (£4 million I heard ) .

"If we don't make it to the promised land then things will have to change but that's the nature of the beast I'm afraid."

Explain yourself Madejski ( but leave it 3 weeks until after the play-off final because that's what everyone else is concentrating on) because it ain't about the money, if players are sold that whole amount should be re-invested, absolutely no excuses this time.

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=103481&start=20&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3941
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Mid Sussex Royal » 10 May 2011 19:48

Where's the black hole this year then?

1. £7M for Sig
2. A cup run the quarters again - including 2 live TV games and extensive highlights. Cannot have been budgeted for
3. Play-offs - increased revenue again - as above
4. League gates - must be at least the same as they would have forecast.

Its either one of 2 things - SJM is seeking repayment of loans (which next set of audited accounts would confirm) or completely incompetent management by the people running the finances of the club.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Ian Royal » 10 May 2011 19:58

Here come the conspiracy brigade, making a mountain out of a single comment that tells them nothing.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20781
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Snowball » 10 May 2011 20:06

"Things changing" (if we don't go up) may mean "Shane will go"

and that might be because we upped his money, and can't pay those levels for another year in the Championship


Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 10 May 2011 20:07

Mid Sussex Royal Where's the black hole this year then?

1. £7M for Sig
2. A cup run the quarters again - including 2 live TV games and extensive highlights. Cannot have been budgeted for
3. Play-offs - increased revenue again - as above
4. League gates - must be at least the same as they would have forecast.

Its either one of 2 things - SJM is seeking repayment of loans (which next set of audited accounts would confirm) or completely incompetent management by the people running the finances of the club.



Or we are paying wages we can't really afford (as people insist here we should do) and rely on selling to pay off the shortfall.

We had a £4 million shortfall predicted for this season. OK, the Gylfi money cleared that, and a bit to spare, but we'd be on target for an income shortfall of the same amount next season too unless anyone this our wage bill will be £4 million lower next season.


The fact of the matter is that we are an average club for this division, and any finishes above mid table are a bonus.

Yes, it would be great if we had a chairman who said "here you are Brian. Here's an extra £10 million from my own pocket", but anyone expecting that is living in a dreamworld. Quite frankly, anyone who can't see we've massively overachieved since coming up in 2002 is blind, and anyone who thinks only such overachievement is acceptable, is an idiot.

Linden Jones' Tash
Member
Posts: 665
Joined: 20 Jun 2009 12:03
Location: north of the river...

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Linden Jones' Tash » 10 May 2011 20:19

does he get comfort in saying......the.....same.....thing......over......and .......over.......and .......over.......and .......over.......and .......over.......again.....



has SJM been taken over by some alien with 3 conversations all from 2005?

CayeneMatt
Member
Posts: 566
Joined: 23 Apr 2011 11:33

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by CayeneMatt » 10 May 2011 20:48

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Mid Sussex Royal Where's the black hole this year then?

Yes, it would be great if we had a chairman who said "here you are Brian. Here's an extra £10 million from my own pocket", but anyone expecting that is living in a dreamworld. Quite frankly, anyone who can't see we've massively overachieved since coming up in 2002 is blind, and anyone who thinks only such overachievement is acceptable, is an idiot.


To be fair - Arab sheiks and the odd foreigner aside, not many chairmen pump their own cash in to a club on an ongoing basis. After the initial purchase or investment, thats normally it.

On another note, BM said after the Sig sale that it would allow him to bring in a few players on loan and pay their wages. So what would Zurab and Leigertwood be on a week? And Harte only cost 150K, money well spent imo, but I bet his weekly pay packet isn't to be sniffed at. Those 3 alone could be costing 1-2M a year?

User avatar
Tamworth_Royal
Member
Posts: 822
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 19:42
Location: She's got a tongue like an electric eel and she likes the taste of a man's tonsils.

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Tamworth_Royal » 10 May 2011 21:09

Ian Royal Here come the conspiracy brigade, making a mountain out of a single comment that tells them nothing.


Why on earth did he make the comment then Dimwit other than to prepare for a let down. Perhaps if he dropped his egotastical price tag he might get rid of the club and us of him.

He has absolulely no interest in taking this club forward in football terms but will agree to the sale of players to benefit John Madejski.

You want a conspiracy Ian? where's the ( Sigi ) money gone ?

User avatar
Handsome Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3326
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 08:21
Location: Practically Rock Paper Scissors Champion of the World

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by Handsome Man » 10 May 2011 22:05

Maguire Depressing stuff though.

Come on Sheikh Al-Bin Laden, come and put us out of our misery.


That would really be depressing.

Long will go to the Premeirship for a few million, we will probs lose Kebe for pennies and a keeper will go, but things shouldn't be too bad this summer. We'll survive.

handbags_harris
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3794
Joined: 10 Jul 2005 12:57

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by handbags_harris » 10 May 2011 22:06

To be honest you could give each sceptic the actual facts and figures for the accounts up to the present day from the moment SJM bought the club and there are many on here who wouldn't believe them :roll:

It actually hacks me off that so many people, even when presented with the only information that can realistically be relied upon - that from within the club - still spout their pre-ordained bullsh*t because the information on the balance sheet doesn't support their view. They seem to completely ignore the fact that their argument is flawed because it only takes into account the recent past - ie, the PL years to the here and now.

And the club's finances is all one conspiracy :roll:

Pathetic really.

PEARCEY
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5970
Joined: 29 Jun 2007 23:44

Re: SJM interview with BBC

by PEARCEY » 10 May 2011 22:09

The reality is we have a large squad by Championship standards and if we don't go up it will have to be cut back. However there is a strong nucleus of young players who are emerging and they will, by and large still be here next season. Whatever happens in the play-offs we can surely be positive about next season.

Who is online

It is currently 14 May 2025 16:19