by maffff » 13 Feb 2013 14:54
by melonhead » 13 Feb 2013 15:03
by Royal Ginger » 13 Feb 2013 19:48
melonhead i think he would have benefited from the change in formation and would have proven himself to be no worse than the other options we have, given a settled back 4 and some protection in front of him, if he had played
by Scutterbucketz » 13 Feb 2013 21:03
melonhead i think he would have benefited from the change in formation and would have proven himself to be no worse than the other options we have, given a settled back 4 and some protection in front of him, if he had played
by Lovely hot donuts! » 13 Feb 2013 22:37
by Ouroboros » 13 Feb 2013 22:40
Lovely hot donuts! Just remembered that "Gorkss 17" is what's on the back of my Reading shirt! Might make me look like a bit of a wally but oxf*rd it, he was incredible last year and I love him!
by The Royal » 13 Feb 2013 22:41
by Maguire » 14 Feb 2013 08:21
by Spud Gun » 14 Feb 2013 10:34
Maguire Good luck to him - class last year and should be guaranteed a great reception from Reading fans whenever he returns
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 14 Feb 2013 13:10
Maguire wrote: Good luck to him - class last year and should be guaranteed a great reception from Reading fans whenever he returns
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2013 22:39
melonheadBraisingsteakRoyal Honest Pro = Bit of a Carthorse.
![]()
was probably one of the best 10 CBs weve ever had last year tbf
by Wimb » 15 Feb 2013 04:21
Royal Gingermelonhead i think he would have benefited from the change in formation and would have proven himself to be no worse than the other options we have, given a settled back 4 and some protection in front of him, if he had played
Hadn't thought of that, you may have a point. He was in the team when they were at their worst. Would be interesting to see how he'd do now.
by melonhead » 15 Feb 2013 10:45
Ian RoyalmelonheadBraisingsteakRoyal Honest Pro = Bit of a Carthorse.
![]()
was probably one of the best 10 CBs weve ever had last year tbf
Ingimarsson, Primus, Upson (if you count loans), Sonko?, Pearce?, Mariappa?, Williams?, Khizanishvili??...
Ok, I'm really struggling now - reckon you could put a case for top 5.
by melonhead » 15 Feb 2013 10:47
WimbRoyal Gingermelonhead i think he would have benefited from the change in formation and would have proven himself to be no worse than the other options we have, given a settled back 4 and some protection in front of him, if he had played
Hadn't thought of that, you may have a point. He was in the team when they were at their worst. Would be interesting to see how he'd do now.
Can't agree I'm afraid Brenders.
While I think he'd have been a bit better, as an individual he was looking off the pace and didn't know how to handle the movement of the better players.
Great Championship defender, limited at the top level. No shame at all in that and at least Brian gave him far more of a chance than Warnock. Still if we put sentiment aside, that decision could well end up haunting us...
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 128 guests