by USA_Loyal_Royal » 04 May 2013 17:57
by URZZZZ » 04 May 2013 18:01
by P!ssed Off » 04 May 2013 18:04
URZZZZ The performance was better but your all getting too excited. Fulham had absouletly nothing to play for. Perhaps we will become very good but people are getting too excited over one game
by URZZZZ » 04 May 2013 18:06
by Sanguine » 04 May 2013 18:08
URZZZZ The performance was better but your all getting too excited. Fulham had absouletly nothing to play for. Perhaps we will become very good but people are getting too excited over one game
by P!ssed Off » 04 May 2013 18:12
URZZZZ To get their first win under Adkins maybe. Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game
by LUX » 04 May 2013 18:22
by URZZZZ » 04 May 2013 18:34
P!ssed OffURZZZZ To get their first win under Adkins maybe. Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game
From a quick glance at the table, it appears that Fulham can still be relegated. They could finish anywhere from 9th -18th so maybe they did have something to play for.
As for "Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game", surely this a positive and not something to complain about.
by royalsroyalsroyals92 » 04 May 2013 18:40
by Jon_rfc » 04 May 2013 18:41
URZZZZP!ssed OffURZZZZ To get their first win under Adkins maybe. Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game
From a quick glance at the table, it appears that Fulham can still be relegated. They could finish anywhere from 9th -18th so maybe they did have something to play for.
As for "Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game", surely this a positive and not something to complain about.
I know that but I am saying it is virtually impossible for Fulham to be relegated and that they had nothing to play for which is why we got the win. We did look a bit better though
by Clyde1998 » 04 May 2013 18:41
by paultheroyal » 04 May 2013 18:49
URZZZZ The performance was better but your all getting too excited. Fulham had absouletly nothing to play for. Perhaps we will become very good but people are getting too excited over one game
by paultheroyal » 04 May 2013 18:49
URZZZZP!ssed OffURZZZZ To get their first win under Adkins maybe. Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game
From a quick glance at the table, it appears that Fulham can still be relegated. They could finish anywhere from 9th -18th so maybe they did have something to play for.
As for "Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game", surely this a positive and not something to complain about.
I know that but I am saying it is virtually impossible for Fulham to be relegated and that they had nothing to play for which is why we got the win. We did look a bit better though
by URZZZZ » 04 May 2013 18:52
by Ian Royal » 04 May 2013 18:54
URZZZZP!ssed OffURZZZZ To get their first win under Adkins maybe. Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game
From a quick glance at the table, it appears that Fulham can still be relegated. They could finish anywhere from 9th -18th so maybe they did have something to play for.
As for "Reading showed that they cared more than Fulham throughut the game", surely this a positive and not something to complain about.
I know that but I am saying it is virtually impossible for Fulham to be relegated and that they had nothing to play for which is why we got the win. We did look a bit better though
by paultheroyal » 04 May 2013 19:03
by URZZZZ » 04 May 2013 19:33
paultheroyal Poor ole URZZZZZ can't even get his quoting right!
by windermere_royal » 04 May 2013 19:43
by winchester_royal » 04 May 2013 19:52
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 399 guests