by soggy biscuit » 03 Jan 2014 08:53
by RoyalBlue » 03 Jan 2014 09:06
CypryRoyalBlue Looks like we will probably miss out on him anyway as RFC seem to think that there is no rush to get on and do anything in this transfer window! Apparently they will get around to talking to Southampton 'in the next week or so' to find out what their thoughts on Sharp are. WTF?!! If Adkins wants Sharp, why the hell hadn't those talks taken place with Saints even before the window opened? No wonder we more often than not fail to sign our targets in transfer windows.
We now have a player (well we don't) wondering who wants him and where he needs to train to feel part of a team. If we do want Sharp, how the hell is that helping continuity? If we don't want him (and that doesn't appear to be what Adkins is indicating) why the hell don't we just say so in fairness to the player and to dampen fans' expections?
It takes two to make a deal - perhaps Southampton want to wait and see if there's interest elsewhere - I can't believe that we haven't tried to do a deal, but they hold all the cards, and there's no urgency whatsoever in their part to do a deal....
We could, I guess, try to force their hand by making a silly offer, but given his performances, I'm not sure that Sharp is worth it.....
by Cypry » 03 Jan 2014 09:12
RoyalBlueCypryRoyalBlue Looks like we will probably miss out on him anyway as RFC seem to think that there is no rush to get on and do anything in this transfer window! Apparently they will get around to talking to Southampton 'in the next week or so' to find out what their thoughts on Sharp are. WTF?!! If Adkins wants Sharp, why the hell hadn't those talks taken place with Saints even before the window opened? No wonder we more often than not fail to sign our targets in transfer windows.
We now have a player (well we don't) wondering who wants him and where he needs to train to feel part of a team. If we do want Sharp, how the hell is that helping continuity? If we don't want him (and that doesn't appear to be what Adkins is indicating) why the hell don't we just say so in fairness to the player and to dampen fans' expections?
It takes two to make a deal - perhaps Southampton want to wait and see if there's interest elsewhere - I can't believe that we haven't tried to do a deal, but they hold all the cards, and there's no urgency whatsoever in their part to do a deal....
We could, I guess, try to force their hand by making a silly offer, but given his performances, I'm not sure that Sharp is worth it.....
You may be right with the first point although some of the comments from Sharp seem to suggest that is not the case. However, if it is, then why give us the mushroom treatment again? Is there really any harm in telling us the truth on this occasion? i.e. 'We have spoken to Southampton, however they (and maybe the player) appear to want to see whether there is interest from elsewhere before making any commitments' .
Sometimes the 'PR spin' from RFC seems pretty clueless.
by paddy20 » 03 Jan 2014 09:44
by Royal Biscuitman » 03 Jan 2014 10:01
Like that Adam Le Fondre chap we signed from League 2 Rotherhampaddy20 Cant get excited about Sharp, not exactly shone since he has been here. Rather an up and coming striker from the nether regions.
by andrew1957 » 03 Jan 2014 11:05
soggy biscuit Can't help but feel we would be setting our sights very low if we sign Sharpe. Bit of a statement of non intent really if that is the quality the club are aiming at.
by Agent Balti » 03 Jan 2014 11:13
by soggy biscuit » 03 Jan 2014 11:17
by Agent Balti » 03 Jan 2014 11:24
soggy biscuit Personally I would prefer us spend money on a young player with potential that the club feel they can develop to be someone good rather than a bloke in his late 30's that hasn't played well for a couple of years, been hit and miss his whole career and just finished a very underwhelming loan spell here.
by RoyalBlue » 03 Jan 2014 17:59
CypryRoyalBlueCypry
It takes two to make a deal - perhaps Southampton want to wait and see if there's interest elsewhere - I can't believe that we haven't tried to do a deal, but they hold all the cards, and there's no urgency whatsoever in their part to do a deal....
We could, I guess, try to force their hand by making a silly offer, but given his performances, I'm not sure that Sharp is worth it.....
You may be right with the first point although some of the comments from Sharp seem to suggest that is not the case. However, if it is, then why give us the mushroom treatment again? Is there really any harm in telling us the truth on this occasion? i.e. 'We have spoken to Southampton, however they (and maybe the player) appear to want to see whether there is interest from elsewhere before making any commitments' .
Sometimes the 'PR spin' from RFC seems pretty clueless.
If they came out and said the player wanted to wait and see what else is on the table, he'd get absolutely slated from some quarters along the lines of "well if he doesn't want to be here". They're a bit "damned if they do, damned if they don't"....
by dogzbollox » 22 Jan 2014 17:16
by maffff » 22 Jan 2014 17:26
by winchester_royal » 22 Jan 2014 17:28
by dogzbollox » 22 Jan 2014 17:28
by Barry the bird boggler » 22 Jan 2014 17:31
by Royal Ginger » 22 Jan 2014 17:32
by maffff » 22 Jan 2014 17:36
by SPARTA » 22 Jan 2014 17:43
maffff Better than a night in with Nick, couple of bottles of Muscadet and a few poppers...
by ZacNaloen » 22 Jan 2014 18:10
by floyd__streete » 22 Jan 2014 18:25
SPARTA Didn't you say we had agreed a deal with Southampton? Frustratingly that must mean there is next to nothing in the pot, contrary to more nonsense from SJM about him ensuring there would be at the very least some money!
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal, Za Vas and 555 guests