Adkins - Pros and Cons

847 posts
Forest Gump
Member
Posts: 255
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 09:22

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Forest Gump » 19 Oct 2014 18:59

As I said I don't dislike his style of football and I agree that he has been seriously under-backed by the management team around him.

But I do think that when confidence is obviously this low it will take a major change at the club to shake the players into a reaction. I suspect that Nigel has run out of pep-talk material and that players are thinking that he cannot make it work.

It is a shame that we cannot make it work with managers who like to play attractive football but we can't because we don't have enough quality in the team and at the moment we need someone who can get the best out of the team that we have. I would love a "non-yes" man like Holloway because I am fed up with all this: " we are good enough, "we are blessed with academy players" etc cr@p. We are not good enough for the Championship this season and that a fact.

I think the fans - maybe not the owners - would appreciate an honest appraisal for a change.

Also can we please stop the: "when so and so returns from injury it'll be alright rubbish - it's nonsense. Those players are not available and they cannot be counted as available anytime soon. In any event typically players who have been out for many months do not come back as good. realistically we may never see Karacan in a Reading short this season, McCleary will almost certainly be a yard slower when he first comes back and Guthrie is perpetually injured it seems. Not sure about Williams but the point is anybody who thinks it is adequate to rely on any of these players adding anything this season is deluded. surely there must be players available on the loan market?
I hope so as we need AT LEAST 2 x CB, 1 x RB, 2 x CM.
Or we can try to stop the current squad from under performing by bringing in a new manager to motivate them. It might just help to avoid the threat of relegation.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24296
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by AthleticoSpizz » 19 Oct 2014 19:43

omg and ffs

out

Royal Bahamas
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: 26 Sep 2011 16:19

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Royal Bahamas » 19 Oct 2014 19:49

So.............Brian has just signed a three year contract with the Gunners......what chance of getting him back? Play-offs by the end of Season?

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by sandman » 19 Oct 2014 19:52

Royal Bahamas So.............Brian has just signed a three year contract with the Gunners......what chance of getting him back? Play-offs by the end of Season?


Actually he's signed for the Gunners for 6 months.

harry
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1584
Joined: 02 Oct 2010 17:16
Location: South Bank then East Stand

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by harry » 19 Oct 2014 19:56

AthleticoSpizz omg and ffs

out


LOL


3points
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2452
Joined: 27 Oct 2013 17:22

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by 3points » 19 Oct 2014 19:59

I just don't understand what formation he's trying to play at the moment. I think it is 4-2-3-1 but feels a lot like 4-2-4 as the "wide players" are not doing their defensive duties. To a large extent Adkins got away with it last season as McAnuff in particular worked back really well. Blackman, Mackie (who used to be a centre forward) and HRK all want play up front and Cox doesn't track back unless he really has to. Murray is clearly better than Pog as a striker, but doesn't work as hard closing teams down either. Add all this together and the lack of a decent defensive midfielder means we are very exposed at the back as well.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30524
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by leon » 19 Oct 2014 20:57

3points I just don't understand what formation he's trying to play at the moment. I think it is 4-2-3-1 but feels a lot like 4-2-4 as the "wide players" are not doing their defensive duties. To a large extent Adkins got away with it last season as McAnuff in particular worked back really well. Blackman, Mackie (who used to be a centre forward) and HRK all want play up front and Cox doesn't track back unless he really has to. Murray is clearly better than Pog as a striker, but doesn't work as hard closing teams down either. Add all this together and the lack of a decent defensive midfielder means we are very exposed at the back as well.


Good points. The way Adkins is setting us up is exposing the defence - as old fashioned as it might be, we need a holding midfielder who can tackle and our wide men to actually work with the full backs to defend.

We let Derby play through us without ever really pressuring them in any part of the field. We might be good with the ball (although not good enough) we will be rolled over by any decent side that can attack us. This is fairly basic stuff that Adkins has not addressed.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24296
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by AthleticoSpizz » 19 Oct 2014 21:03

so we're talking about signing someone like Leigertwood right?

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30524
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by leon » 19 Oct 2014 21:04

AthleticoSpizz so we're talking about signing someone like Leigertwood right?


I would say so, yes.


AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24296
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by AthleticoSpizz » 19 Oct 2014 21:06

...and poses the question...why did we let him go etc

Why does Hope Akpan get dropped?

User avatar
urz13
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2058
Joined: 16 May 2011 20:37
Location: The following statement is false. The previous statement is true.

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by urz13 » 20 Oct 2014 02:21

AthleticoSpizz Why does Hope Akpan get dropped?

Because he's shit.

quickwingerswife
Member
Posts: 125
Joined: 24 Sep 2014 10:03
Location: Lambourn

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by quickwingerswife » 20 Oct 2014 06:38

Pros. Likes flat footed defenders
Can recite fairy tales after 3 nil defeats
Back up Physio
Keeps Solent University in business
Loved and adored in Southampton

Cons. Wears blinkers.
Can't react with the crowd.
Doesn't realise we are heading for Div 1
Chews Tobacco,

User avatar
Harpers So Solid Crew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5273
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 08:39
Location: enjoying the money

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Harpers So Solid Crew » 20 Oct 2014 07:50

In the region of £5million annual wages unselectable due to injuries, mccleary the best wide player, and karajan and williams, the two best at breaking up attacks, and Guthrie, who is rarely fit and we probably want shot of. But no one wants him.


User avatar
wingnut
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1629
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 16:19
Location: Metamorphosis

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by wingnut » 20 Oct 2014 08:25

leon
3points I just don't understand what formation he's trying to play at the moment. I think it is 4-2-3-1 but feels a lot like 4-2-4 as the "wide players" are not doing their defensive duties. To a large extent Adkins got away with it last season as McAnuff in particular worked back really well. Blackman, Mackie (who used to be a centre forward) and HRK all want play up front and Cox doesn't track back unless he really has to. Murray is clearly better than Pog as a striker, but doesn't work as hard closing teams down either. Add all this together and the lack of a decent defensive midfielder means we are very exposed at the back as well.


Good points. The way Adkins is setting us up is exposing the defence - as old fashioned as it might be, we need a holding midfielder who can tackle and our wide men to actually work with the full backs to defend.

We let Derby play through us without ever really pressuring them in any part of the field. We might be good with the ball (although not good enough) we will be rolled over by any decent side that can attack us. This is fairly basic stuff that Adkins has not addressed.

Yep agree with both posts. I have to think that our wide players must be instructed to play narrow - it's been such a feature of Adkins' reign here that the players can't be doing it unbidded.

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by sandman » 20 Oct 2014 08:27

urz13
AthleticoSpizz Why does Hope Akpan get dropped?

Because he's shit.


Nothing like blindly following the crowd is there? :roll:

Bossbluff
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 08:02

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Bossbluff » 20 Oct 2014 08:44

Altough i have been out of the country for nearly evey game this season, i have not seen any improvement made to the club with him leading the team.
Is he really as good as they thought??

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26071
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Silver Fox » 20 Oct 2014 11:28

RoyalBlue At least the highly vocal 'Adkins out' minority are happy tonight.


Why would that be? HE's still in charge and we're still subjected to the same old excuses for his failures from Nigel's acolytes, plus our football team lost.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5887
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Extended-Phenotype » 20 Oct 2014 11:48

Wasn't there.

Sounds like individual defenders were at fault once again. Might it not be them that need replacing rather than the manager?

Amato
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 23 Mar 2014 21:12

Nigel Adkins

by Amato » 20 Oct 2014 12:35

For those who want Adkins to go, think about this:

After a big cry from supporters, Reading sacked Brendan Rodgers in December 2009 after losing too many games.
2011 Swansea 4 Reading 2
2013-14 Liverpool nearly win Premiership and qualify for Champions League. First time since 2007
October 2014 Liverpool supporters ring 606 to say 'sack Rodgers'

2012 Adkins is the first Southampton manager to gain back-to-back promotion
January 2013 Adkins is sacked with Saints in the top half of the table

Adkins joined Reading in a state of transition after McDermott had got us relegated. With Sir John losing money hand over fist he needed to cut the budget. Last season Adkins was effectively hamstrung because of the absence of the Russian 'investor' and the subsequent lack of funding.

This season Adkins is working with kids and is doing a bloody good job. If ire should be pointed anywhere then it should be at the new consortium who are responsible for funding their new venture. I don't think it was Adkins who sold McCarthy, Morrison et al, it was the board.

Adkins deserves, and needs, another season at the MadStad.

As Billy Beane, the Baseball coach says 'no plan interrupted is ever successful'.

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 8976
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: Nigel Adkins

by Forbury Lion » 20 Oct 2014 12:39

Another Nigel Adkins thread, just what we need. :roll:

847 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 226 guests

It is currently 19 Sep 2024 00:44