by Snowball » 11 Apr 2015 22:39
by Scarface » 12 Apr 2015 00:48
by JC » 12 Apr 2015 02:09
Scarface yes he had a decent game, but his wages are high as he signed his last deal in the Premier League, so is he really worth a new deal on that money? Interesting to see if he would accept a new deal on lower wages.
by Woodcote Royal » 12 Apr 2015 02:24
AthleticoSpizzyou do realise that this is la la land.Snowball How could anyone not think Jem had a good game today?
Anyway, we all await Ian's take on it
by Sutekh » 12 Apr 2015 08:48
3points Reckoned the only reason he played today was due to the him being the face of the Ryan's Royals thing. Don't expect to see him starts another game this season.
Out of interest what has happened to Williams since his suspension. Did he get injured on international duty?
by 3points » 12 Apr 2015 09:04
Sutekh3points Reckoned the only reason he played today was due to the him being the face of the Ryan's Royals thing. Don't expect to see him starts another game this season.
Out of interest what has happened to Williams since his suspension. Did he get injured on international duty?
He may return to the bench v Bournemouth but given that Ake & Chalobah are cup tied and Williams is injured it wouldn't surprise me to see him in the starting 11 next week.
Certainly expect him to see him getting considerable game time now he has a full 75 minutes under his belt and considerable decisions needing to be made in the simmer over the entire playing staff.
by Royalwaster » 12 Apr 2015 09:15
by 3points » 12 Apr 2015 09:23
Royalwaster Williams is injured - he came back from international duty with a knee injury ... BBC Berks as usual are clueless.
by ZacNaloen » 12 Apr 2015 10:00
by Extended-Phenotype » 12 Apr 2015 17:20
by sandman » 12 Apr 2015 17:22
Extended-Phenotype Distinctly average player romanticised by his long term injury.
by Extended-Phenotype » 12 Apr 2015 17:35
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Apr 2015 18:22
by LoyalRoyal22 » 12 Apr 2015 19:05
by download » 12 Apr 2015 20:46
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 Apr 2015 20:50
by Nameless » 12 Apr 2015 21:04
download We need to remember RFC doesn't owe Jem anything having paid for 2 years of rehabilitation. If he gets greedy about the length or size of a new contract, they are well within their rights to say no.
Perhaps a 1 year extension at a moderate amount would be reasonable.
by Huntley & Palmer » 12 Apr 2015 23:12
by Royal Ginger » 12 Apr 2015 23:42
by Snowball » 13 Apr 2015 08:43
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], tidus_mi2 and 248 guests