Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

Yes, he's our best CB
24
33%
Yes, he gets the job done
39
54%
Meh, he's alright
4
6%
He's bang average
1
1%
No, he does somethings alright but not too sharp overall
2
3%
No, when he's bad, he's pretty bad
0
No votes
No, he's useless
2
3%
 
Total votes: 72
User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4929
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Lower West » 24 Jan 2016 00:20

A good partner for Cooper at this point in his career development.

RoyalAuzzie
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 23:34
Location: I do wot i want m9

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by RoyalAuzzie » 24 Jan 2016 00:32

My dad knows someone who knows one of the physios apparently and I've heard he thinks he is the bees knees and maybe one of the egos McD was talking about.

Plus I don't really rate him that much, so many times today he took ages on the ball and ended up passing to the guy 3 meters away, and he was at fault for their goal, he literally watched Hooper peel away from him and just let him go, allowing him to score. Also watching him today he wasn't really involved in the team banter or togetherness so I don't know how he is viewed by his teammates...? Probably reading too much into things but just an observation I made

ROWY
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 16:45

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by ROWY » 24 Jan 2016 08:08

Undecided, but on balance it would be a no

Clearly a good player with plenty of talent at this level, but, I have a real problem with the less tangible area

His body language is just not right for someone who really cares - I think he is trying to portray the image of class, which means he doesn't rush around and get involved with the nitshit and trivia, like stopping their forwards running into space and scoring

I would just like to see more urgency, involvement with the team and evidence that playing for reading is really important to him

Snowball136
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 11:42

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Snowball136 » 24 Jan 2016 10:40

ROWY Undecided, but on balance it would be a no

Clearly a good player with plenty of talent at this level, but, I have a real problem with the less tangible area

His body language is just not right for someone who really cares - I think he is trying to portray the image of class, which means he doesn't rush around and get involved with the nitshit and trivia, like stopping their forwards running into space and scoring

I would just like to see more urgency, involvement with the team and evidence that playing for reading is really important to him


This (I think). I presumed he just couldn't run. He has class for this level
but he seems to be "coasting" a bit. I'd like to see him within ten yards of Cooper
when Coops is the second CB, and talking, talking, talking.

Cooper is exposed 1-on-1 quite a lot IMO. Can you think of many times where Coops has been beaten
and Ferdinand has saved the day, sweeping up?

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by sandman » 24 Jan 2016 10:50

ROWY Undecided, but on balance it would be a no

Clearly a good player with plenty of talent at this level, but, I have a real problem with the less tangible area

His body language is just not right for someone who really cares - I think he is trying to portray the image of class, which means he doesn't rush around and get involved with the nitshit and trivia, like stopping their forwards running into space and scoring

I would just like to see more urgency, involvement with the team and evidence that playing for reading is really important to him


With all due respect, the fact the guy went away and trained in the summer when he could have just had time off like everyone else shows that playing for Reading does mean quite a lot to him. Perhaps he should kiss the badge and bang his chest more to show his commitment.


User avatar
Far Canal
Member
Posts: 697
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 00:31
Location: Kennetside

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Far Canal » 24 Jan 2016 11:35

Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2016 12:38

Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.


https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959206/Live There's heat maps of player's touches here.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 17951
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Pepe the Horseman » 24 Jan 2016 13:07

Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.

Cooper was at fault for the goal as he passed it straight to a Wednesday player.

Shame Anton's stunning volley didn't go in.

Snowball136
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 11:42

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Snowball136 » 24 Jan 2016 13:56

Ian Royal
Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.


https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959206/Live There's heat maps of player's touches here.



Norwood had 121 touches in the game

Interesting that new kid Evans had more touches per minute than anybody (66 in first half)


Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10062
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: Running from The Left

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Millsy » 24 Jan 2016 13:58

Almost irrelevant whether or not we rate him as we have such little cover in that position.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2016 18:22

Snowball136
Ian Royal
Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.


https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959206/Live There's heat maps of player's touches here.



Norwood had 121 touches in the game

Interesting that new kid Evans had more touches per minute than anybody (66 in first half)

He played 64 minutes, not 45.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20767
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Snowball » 24 Jan 2016 20:07

Ian Royal
Snowball136

Norwood had 121 touches in the game

Interesting that new kid Evans had more touches per minute than anybody (66 in first half)

He played 64 minutes, not 45.


So he was second with 99-equivalent touches to our "superstar" midfielder
"30 more touches" than Williams

this in his first ever game at this level, aged 21, thrown in at the deep end,
barely knows he team-mates and against a top-six side

that suggests serious class and potential

User avatar
wingnut
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1627
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 16:19
Location: Metamorphosis

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by wingnut » 25 Jan 2016 08:25

Pepe the Horseman
Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.

Cooper was at fault for the goal as he passed it straight to a Wednesday player.

Yep, Cooper did pass it to a Wednesday player, but Anton let Hooper take a step or two backwards to lose him and score. If Anton had tracked with him it would've been fairly straightforward to cut out the cross.


sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by sandman » 25 Jan 2016 18:41

wingnut
Pepe the Horseman
Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.

Cooper was at fault for the goal as he passed it straight to a Wednesday player.

Yep, Cooper did pass it to a Wednesday player, but Anton let Hooper take a step or two backwards to lose him and score. If Anton had tracked with him it would've been fairly straightforward to cut out the cross.


And if Cooper hadn't passed it straight to Wednesday then nobody would have even had to try and track Hooper.

User avatar
Far Canal
Member
Posts: 697
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 00:31
Location: Kennetside

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Far Canal » 25 Jan 2016 20:44

Ian Royal
Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.


https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/959206/Live There's heat maps of player's touches here.


Thanks for that link Ian, very interesting. The heatmap needs a bit of interpretation. Robson-Kanu covered a lot of ground, but then he did play on both wings.

User avatar
Far Canal
Member
Posts: 697
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 00:31
Location: Kennetside

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Far Canal » 25 Jan 2016 20:47

Pepe the Horseman
Far Canal Ferdinand was at fault for Wednesday's goal. Cooper was marking Forestieri, Ferdinand should have picked up Hooper.
Ferdinand is experienced, his positioning is excellent and he is good on the ball, but he looks as though he would like to stand on the same patch of grass for the entire game.
I'd love to see the prozone stats. Ali Al Habsi probably runs him close on distance covered.

Cooper was at fault for the goal as he passed it straight to a Wednesday player.


Indeed he did, so that's both of our centre backs at fault then.

Mr Cinema
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 23:32

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by Mr Cinema » 25 Jan 2016 20:57

Snowball
Ian Royal
Snowball136

Norwood had 121 touches in the game

Interesting that new kid Evans had more touches per minute than anybody (66 in first half)

He played 64 minutes, not 45.


So he was second with 99-equivalent touches to our "superstar" midfielder
"30 more touches" than Williams

this in his first ever game at this level, aged 21, thrown in at the deep end,
barely knows he team-mates and against a top-six side

that suggests serious class and potential


It doesn't really though . he was second in touches to the only other central midfielder and you're saying that he touched the ball more times than the regular central midfielder he replaced and was exiled out to the wing where he barely saw the ball because neither central midfielder had a good enough game to involve him.

He may prove to be a good signing but there is nothing in what you've said above , or in how he actually played that suggests "serious class and potential". I do think he'll be a very good player for us but not based on that debut. We were considerably better once he left the field.

RoyalJames101
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1053
Joined: 24 Sep 2010 20:55

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by RoyalJames101 » 26 Jan 2016 10:52

Having seen the highlights for the goal at the weekend I'm not sure you can blame Ferdinand.

Very clever movement from Hooper and even if he follows Hooper then he's left a big gap between the goal and the penalty spot for someone to run into.

You could argue that one of the CM's should have been in that space in the first place.

User avatar
John Smith
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4718
Joined: 20 Jan 2010 23:47
Location: Astronauts The New Conquistadors

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by John Smith » 26 Jan 2016 17:06

Anton Ferdinand is the worst player in the senior squad

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24008
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Do you rate Anton Ferdinand?

by AthleticoSpizz » 26 Jan 2016 17:08

Thanx for those words of wisdom

:lol: :lol: :lol: :arrow:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Franchise FC and 290 guests

It is currently 29 Jun 2024 07:49