SCIAGpaddy20 Clearly Stam has made big changes from last season.
Is it that clear? I think the main difference is that Stam's tried a back three on occasion, but stylistically we've broadly played the same way since we got relegated.I feel we only have about half a team that can take it forward.
Such players need to be comfortable on the ball, patient, spot openings early and have a change of pace.
I think the following players are the only ones that suit this system;
Moore, McShane, Blackett, Kelly, McCleary, Berens, Evans, Watson and Swift when he regains his form. That leaves a lot of new signings to make.
Well for starters, you just listed nine players, which is a lot more than half a team!
I find it strange that you'd include McShane in that list. The three "weak points", at least in terms of style, are Al-Habsi, McShane, and Williams. They bring other qualities which balance that out to an extent (we'll struggle to get a better goalkeeper than Al-Habsi), but they're fairly uncomfortable on the ball and don't have much vision. All the other senior players are either fine or unknowns (the new signings). Guess you could argue that Gunter's only "good enough" but meh, he's not holding us back from promotion. While the likes of Obita and Joey might not be good enough players, they'e completely suited to our style of play.
Our academy has been using this sort of set up for the best part of a decade so they should almost all be comfortable with it.
If we narrowly miss out on promotion, then this summer's priorities should be a long-term replacement for Kermorgant, an upgrade on Williams, and a better footballing version of McShane. Could also maybe do with signing an excellent left back if one becomes available, and maybe a third striker. We certainly don't need yet another summer in which we sign a whole new team, unless we get promoted.
Your post was credible until I got to the bit that stated that "Gunter is good enough" yet McShane isn't, are you sure you watch Reading every week?