by Eaststandman » 04 Feb 2018 15:36
by Denver Royal » 04 Feb 2018 15:41
genomeLower West Reading has lost currently it's soul. We are little more than a stepping stone for Stam and the better squad players.
We want out club back...........
But people were saying, last year under Stam, that "we have our club back again" after a couple of years of being rubbish.
Just because we're in shit form doesn't mean that the "club is dead" or "we have no soul"... it's overly dramatic nonsense that doesn't help anyone.
by Rea Ding » 04 Feb 2018 15:57
by tmesis » 04 Feb 2018 16:08
John Smith Can I just reiterate we aren’t going down.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 04 Feb 2018 17:03
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Feb 2018 17:09
by Lower West » 04 Feb 2018 17:13
genomeLower West Reading has lost currently it's soul. We are little more than a stepping stone for Stam and the better squad players.
We want out club back...........
But people were saying, last year under Stam, that "we have our club back again" after a couple of years of being rubbish.
Just because we're in shit form doesn't mean that the "club is dead" or "we have no soul"... it's overly dramatic nonsense that doesn't help anyone.
by RoyalBlue » 04 Feb 2018 17:22
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Feb 2018 17:23
oh and as a sidedish, just look at where our opposition from that day are right nowAthleticoSpizz Indeed it did......and it was actually a bit of a laugh.
However, I would imagine that it pre-dates some of the posters here....and (from memory) there was only about 6 1/2 thousand there to participate....so some of the many that allude to it probably weren’t even there.
by tidus_mi2 » 04 Feb 2018 17:24
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Feb 2018 17:25
reading some of the BFTG comments, I think that acronym still stands.RoyalBlue Those calling for PANTS DAY 2 as a way of removing Stam seem to be forgetting what the acronym stood for. 'Players Are Not Trying Sufficiently' . Is that really the case now? I thought your beef was against Stam.
by tmesis » 04 Feb 2018 18:09
RoyalBlue Those calling for PANTS DAY 2 as a way of removing Stam seem to be forgetting what the acronym stood for. 'Players Are Not Trying Sufficiently' . Is that really the case now? I thought your beef was against Stam.
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Feb 2018 18:14
as good an idea as any.....and as in the PANTS day thing.....getting your point across with a bit of a laughtmesisRoyalBlue Those calling for PANTS DAY 2 as a way of removing Stam seem to be forgetting what the acronym stood for. 'Players Are Not Trying Sufficiently' . Is that really the case now? I thought your beef was against Stam.
The acronym came after the idea though.
Maybe we should comment on how boring the football is by turning up in pyjamas and dozing off across the empty seats during the game.
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 04 Feb 2018 18:39
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Feb 2018 18:44
by JR » 04 Feb 2018 18:49
Snowflake Royal I reserve protests for the real shit and people who have been consistently poor with no history of success for us, personally.
I won't chant 'Stam out', 'sacked in the morning' or wave around pants because I don't think he deserves it. So far he's had an excellent season beyond all expectations and most of a pretty poor one. But currently we're not really a lot worse off than the two seasons prior to him taking over, but with a better squad for recovering.
It just strikes me as ungrateful. He's performed badly enough to be sacked but I have no ill will towards him. If he goes it'll be 'thanks for your efforts and the good times' from me and 'lets get on with it and back the team and new guy'
I don't think thrre really needs to be much pressure from the fans. The general malaise on the pitch is pretty clear and results and performances speak for themselves.
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Feb 2018 18:53
by Sebastian the Red » 05 Feb 2018 15:09
Sebastian the Red You should try going along to a game or two of rugby - higher class fans at a higher class sport. It's just wonderful.
Users browsing this forum: Freddy and 155 guests