Lower West You have to question how many of the players actually want to be at the club.......
No tenacity, no spirit , no flair.
Sacking Stam isn't the answer.
Isn’t that Stam’s job to implement those 3 things?
by Hound » 10 Feb 2018 19:38
Lower West You have to question how many of the players actually want to be at the club.......
No tenacity, no spirit , no flair.
Sacking Stam isn't the answer.
by leon » 10 Feb 2018 19:39
HoundLower West You have to question how many of the players actually want to be at the club.......
No tenacity, no spirit , no flair.
Sacking Stam isn't the answer.
Isn’t that Stam’s job to implement those 3 things?
by Hound » 10 Feb 2018 19:43
by royal_rumble » 10 Feb 2018 19:44
HoundLower West You have to question how many of the players actually want to be at the club.......
No tenacity, no spirit , no flair.
Sacking Stam isn't the answer.
Isn’t that Stam’s job to implement those 3 things?
by windermereROYAL » 10 Feb 2018 19:49
by Ascotexgunner » 10 Feb 2018 19:53
by Longhorn1970 » 10 Feb 2018 19:56
by Longhorn1970 » 10 Feb 2018 19:58
Ascotexgunner He said in his Friday interview that training went well. Did they beat the cones this week?
by windermereROYAL » 10 Feb 2018 20:00
Longhorn1970 perhaps Jaap wasn't available for post match interview as Gourlay had summoned him ! Just a dream
by Longhorn1970 » 10 Feb 2018 20:04
windermereROYALLonghorn1970 perhaps Jaap wasn't available for post match interview as Gourlay had summoned him ! Just a dream
Corrected.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 10 Feb 2018 20:16
Hound Obvs don’t know what goes on at the training ground etc, but we look badly coached this year. As first team coach, not sure Gilkes is the answer
by peterroyal76 » 10 Feb 2018 20:19
Ascotexgunner He said in his Friday interview that training went well. Did they beat the cones this week?
by Longhorn1970 » 10 Feb 2018 20:21
peterroyal76Ascotexgunner He said in his Friday interview that training went well. Did they beat the cones this week?
1-1. Cones worked hard and didn’t make it easy for us. Cones defended well especially after being reduced to 7 on the hour mark.
by windermereROYAL » 10 Feb 2018 20:34
peterroyal76Ascotexgunner He said in his Friday interview that training went well. Did they beat the cones this week?
1-1. Cones worked hard and didn’t make it easy for us. Cones defended well especially after being reduced to 7 on the hour mark.
by Longhorn1970 » 10 Feb 2018 20:41
windermereROYALpeterroyal76Ascotexgunner He said in his Friday interview that training went well. Did they beat the cones this week?
1-1. Cones worked hard and didn’t make it easy for us. Cones defended well especially after being reduced to 7 on the hour mark.
I heard the cones had a goal disallowed near the end too.
by Hound » 10 Feb 2018 20:54
Mid Sussex RoyalHound Obvs don’t know what goes on at the training ground etc, but we look badly coached this year. As first team coach, not sure Gilkes is the answer
Agree - never came across as the sharpest tool in the box when he was a player when interviewed, was very surprised when he was appointed coach.
by SCIAG » 10 Feb 2018 21:05
ROYALJOE We was right up there that season till Steve Clarke had his head turned and decided to speak to Fulham from that point onwards we dropped down the table. Believe we could of got or competed for the play-off that season if Clarke did'nt have his head turned. It's always tough for a new manager to take charge half-way through a season, that's they we fell off but we were never as bad that this that season
by Longhorn1970 » 10 Feb 2018 21:17
Lower West You have to question how many of the players actually want to be at the club.......
No tenacity, no spirit , no flair.
Sacking Stam isn't the answer.
by Old Boy Blue » 10 Feb 2018 21:20
Users browsing this forum: Dave the rave, Google [Bot], Greatwesternline, Mid Sussex Royal, WestYorksRoyal and 159 guests