by Snowflake Royal » 21 Jan 2024 00:39
by tmesis » 21 Jan 2024 09:34
Snowflake Royal Safe to say the Academy is paying its way this season.
We wouldn't have a side without it.
by Orion1871 » 21 Jan 2024 09:46
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Jan 2024 10:03
Orion1871 It's a shame it's taken this for Dai to start using the Academy in the way it's supposed to be used.
If he was a sensible owner, the Academy would have been paying its way several times over the last few years, and the club would be on a much better footing right now.
by Armadillo Roadkill » 21 Jan 2024 10:40
by Brogue » 21 Jan 2024 11:04
tmesisSnowflake Royal Safe to say the Academy is paying its way this season.
We wouldn't have a side without it.
£5 million would get us 19 players on £5000 a week.
The whole academy system seems to have pretty much been engineered to make it impossible for clubs without premier league wealth to be able to afford it, while also making it impossible for smaller clubs to be adequately compensated when bigger clubs poach their better younger players.
by Orion1871 » 21 Jan 2024 11:55
BroguetmesisSnowflake Royal Safe to say the Academy is paying its way this season.
We wouldn't have a side without it.
£5 million would get us 19 players on £5000 a week.
The whole academy system seems to have pretty much been engineered to make it impossible for clubs without premier league wealth to be able to afford it, while also making it impossible for smaller clubs to be adequately compensated when bigger clubs poach their better younger players.
But it also generates transfer revenue. Olise we got 8 million for. We sold some guy to Southampton at the start of the season for over a million. Holmes has just gone for 500k. abbey we don’t know yet. Plus if the club was run properly we would have got decent fees for Richards and loader. Probably in the region of 2.5 mill each. In the last three years the academy has bought in about 10 million quid into the coffers but it could easily have been say 15 million plus over the last 5 years. That’s 3million a year in transfer revenue over the last 5 years. Which only leaves the academy costing 2 million a year. Then add the money saved in not having to pay transfer fees for all the current academy products in the first team. Then factor in the wages saved as the academy products will be on less than a player signed. It can pay for itself if managed properly.
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Jan 2024 12:18
BroguetmesisSnowflake Royal Safe to say the Academy is paying its way this season.
We wouldn't have a side without it.
£5 million would get us 19 players on £5000 a week.
The whole academy system seems to have pretty much been engineered to make it impossible for clubs without premier league wealth to be able to afford it, while also making it impossible for smaller clubs to be adequately compensated when bigger clubs poach their better younger players.
But it also generates transfer revenue. Olise we got 8 million for. We sold some guy to Southampton at the start of the season for over a million. Holmes has just gone for 500k. abbey we don’t know yet. Plus if the club was run properly we would have got decent fees for Richards and loader. Probably in the region of 2.5 mill each. In the last three years the academy has bought in about 10 million quid into the coffers but it could easily have been say 15 million plus over the last 5 years. That’s 3million a year in transfer revenue over the last 5 years. Which only leaves the academy costing 2 million a year. Then add the money saved in not having to pay transfer fees for all the current academy products in the first team. Then factor in the wages saved as the academy products will be on less than a player signed. It can pay for itself if managed properly.
by blythspartan » 21 Jan 2024 13:45
by Schmeichel the dog » 21 Jan 2024 14:34
blythspartan I have seen a couple of tweets saying that Abbey has been told that if he doesn’t agree to a move the wages won’t be paid this month. That’s oxf*rd terrible to do that to a young player, if true.
by tmesis » 21 Jan 2024 14:47
Snowflake Royal Clearly a Cat 1 Academy is unsustainable in L2 and for long at L1.
.
by Brogue » 21 Jan 2024 16:09
tmesisSnowflake Royal Clearly a Cat 1 Academy is unsustainable in L2 and for long at L1.
.
This is the crucial part though. We are in League One, and might be in League Two next year.
If (and this is admittedly a 'back of a fag packet' calculation) it's costing £5 million a year, then can we really afford to have the first 8500 or so fans through the door just paying for the academy? Add on the rent, and it could leave us with a zero playing budget for next season.
If someone does buy us, then especially if we are in League Two next year, that owner has to make some very difficult choices about expenditure at the club. Even now, averaging 12000, we can't balance the books or put out a good team, in a league where most clubs have a significantly lower income.
by Rax » 21 Jan 2024 16:44
Schmeichel the dogblythspartan I have seen a couple of tweets saying that Abbey has been told that if he doesn’t agree to a move the wages won’t be paid this month. That’s oxf*rd terrible to do that to a young player, if true.
Despicable (if true) but yet another example of how far we seem to have fallen as a club. Sad as it is to say I wouldn’t begrudge any young player the opportunity to continue their development elsewhere. Without any concrete signs of new ownership on the horizon we’re not in a position to offer any player a vision of a future at this club. So thanks once again Mr Dai. And when you do finally leave please take your mate Kia Joorabchian with you. I note that his company (Sport Invest UK Ltd) represent Nelson Abbey, and for that matter Tyler Bindon, so I fully expect Bindon’s sale before Dai and his cronies finally leave the building………
by Clyde1998 » 21 Jan 2024 17:58
Snowflake RoyalClyde1998Greatwesternline
The football league profit rules don't care about cashflow. They care about accounting losses. and other people on here are talking about accounting losses they dont understand in teh accounts. Football accounts have three big outgoings, salaries, contract ammortisations, and losses on disposal of players sold. I.e. you sell a player for less than what his contract is valued for in the books. So its perfectly valid to discuss how much ejaria is costing the accounts.
In terms of cashflow now, why are we so screwed? Probably because our revenue is extremely small now.
In 21-22 in the championship we had matchday income of £3m and tv money of £6m with average attendance of 14249. So £9m in total. And some player sales.
This season we will have maybe average attandance of 10k, so maybe matchday revenue of £1.8m and Tv money of £1.5m. We're not looking at much more than £3m in revenue.
Back end of last season Bowen kept saying we are out of the water now in terms of FFP rules, we'd had out deductions. People even said allowable losses are higher in League 1 because owners can do certain things.
Its probably quite likely that Bowen went and offered some decent deals to attract Knibbs, Smith, Savage. Button. We've been run unsustainably before, we are probably doing so this year too. The fact the club runs out of money each month is pretty strong evidence that our monthly wage bill is in excess of our income.
You've missed commercial revenue (sponsorship, merchandising, etc.) from your estimates. The 2021-22 accounts showed £4.6m in commercial revenue, in addition to £3.6m of matchday and £8.4m in broadcasting revenues. The club had total revenues of £16.9m that season.
Charlton in 2021-22, probably the most comparable club to us in League One, received £2m from broadcasting, £4.9m from matchday and £1.8m from commercial revenue, plus £1m from 'other' revenue; they received a total of £9.8m in revenue that season. Their categories aren't directly comparable to ours, for example they count advertising revenue as matchday and streaming revenue as commercial, whereas I believe we count them as commercial and broadcasting respectively.
Realistically, the club will receive somewhere between £8m and £10m in revenue this season:
- On matchday revenues, the £3,643,777 the club received in 2021-22 divided by the (claimed) average attendance of 14,249 is £255.72 per average fan. Using that average for 10,000 fans would be £2,557,216 per season (keep in mind ticket prices increased this season).
- Looking at the impact on commercial revenues after relegation, it appears most clubs see basically no impact on this income stream in the season following relegation - even if we say it's down 20%, that's £3.7m.
- Let's use the £2m in broadcasting revenue Charlton received in 2021-22.
- Overall that's £8.3m in total revenue, before considering the impact of player sales.
Gwl's estimate of £3m income was so low it was obviously wrong without any maths required.
Our average attendance is also over 12,000 currently. 2000 higher than his estimate.
Proper civil service maths going on there.
by Webster750 » 21 Jan 2024 19:50
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 21 Jan 2024 19:57
Webster750 Anthony Smith @smudgersport - 19:41
Hearing Gymshark's Ben Francis is on the verge of becoming the sole #readingfc owner. Name has been mentioned for a while in connection with William Storey and Genevra consortium, and I'm told a deal is almost done.
Yes please!
by Winston Biscuit » 21 Jan 2024 20:01
YorkshireRoyal99Webster750 Anthony Smith @smudgersport - 19:41
Hearing Gymshark's Ben Francis is on the verge of becoming the sole #readingfc owner. Name has been mentioned for a while in connection with William Storey and Genevra consortium, and I'm told a deal is almost done.
Yes please!
Not sure on his record before but it certainly seems to have come out of the blue. I can't see anyone else reporting this from a quick search either. Encouraging, but not hanging my hat on it yet.
by Clyde1998 » 21 Jan 2024 20:06
YorkshireRoyal99Webster750 Anthony Smith @smudgersport - 19:41
Hearing Gymshark's Ben Francis is on the verge of becoming the sole #readingfc owner. Name has been mentioned for a while in connection with William Storey and Genevra consortium, and I'm told a deal is almost done.
Yes please!
Not sure on his record before but it certainly seems to have come out of the blue. I can't see anyone else reporting this from a quick search either. Encouraging, but not hanging my hat on it yet.
by NathStPaul » 21 Jan 2024 20:15
Webster750 Anthony Smith @smudgersport - 19:41
Hearing Gymshark's Ben Francis is on the verge of becoming the sole #readingfc owner. Name has been mentioned for a while in connection with William Storey and Genevra consortium, and I'm told a deal is almost done.
Yes please!
by tmesis » 21 Jan 2024 20:16
Clyde1998YorkshireRoyal99Webster750 Anthony Smith @smudgersport - 19:41
Hearing Gymshark's Ben Francis is on the verge of becoming the sole #readingfc owner. Name has been mentioned for a while in connection with William Storey and Genevra consortium, and I'm told a deal is almost done.
Yes please!
Not sure on his record before but it certainly seems to have come out of the blue. I can't see anyone else reporting this from a quick search either. Encouraging, but not hanging my hat on it yet.
Indeed. If it happens he seems to have the potential to be a fantastic owner - based in the UK, clearly has money (which would hopefully allow debts to be cleared), a football supporter (has a season ticket at Aston Villa).
I won't accept it will happen until it actually does though.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tails and 227 guests