MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

145 posts
User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12259
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Dirk Gently » 24 Feb 2025 11:54

Clyde1998
PieEater Just to add - I think they need to do something about head injuries. Cochrane held his head and faked a head injury at every opportunity, and remarkably recovered when Brum could break. I think the ref needs to show some concern and after 3 feigned injuries and send them off to get assessed for their own safety.

This has been going on for ages. Problem is it’s usually a sure fire way to stop the game.

Players without a head injury who hold their head should get a yellow card if the ref believes they’re trying to game it.


Be a very brave ref who makes a decision like that - if they get it wrong and the player does actually have a head injury and plays on to avoid the sanction then they face potential massive liability.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45075
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 24 Feb 2025 12:10

It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20496
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Stranded » 24 Feb 2025 12:16

Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45075
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 24 Feb 2025 12:19

Stranded
Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.

Yeah. Also sack off requiring a ref stopping the game and just let physios come on when there's a concern. Then the ref can choose to stop the game if necessary.

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27297
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Sanguine » 24 Feb 2025 12:25

Stranded
Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.


This. Make it a minimum 10 minutes for that concussion assessment. After that time, if deemed fit, the player can return to the field.


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45075
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 24 Feb 2025 12:28

Stops all that nonsense when players are clearly unfit to continue but refuse to be subbed.

User avatar
Whore Jackie
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2753
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 13:48
Location: Over 'ere

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Whore Jackie » 24 Feb 2025 12:28

Hound Thought Campbell did ok yesterday, best for a while


Yeah, I thought it was his best game post-injury. Granted he did a few frustrating things, but he's always done that even when he was at his best.

Really enjoyed the game, back four were immense and midfield played well. Much prefer Wareham up top to Kelvin. Think he was a little unlucky not to start. Have my doubts about him, but for me, he's looked really sharp since Smith left. Still can't work out what Camara's best position is, he didn't look particularly effective on either wing.

User avatar
Dave the rave
Member
Posts: 977
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 18:15
Location: Likes this

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Dave the rave » 24 Feb 2025 13:46

Sanguine
Stranded
Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.


This. Make it a minimum 10 minutes for that concussion assessment. After that time, if deemed fit, the player can return to the field.


Same for cramp. So much cramp around these days :roll:

Ally McCoist made me chuckle the other day with his reaction to a player getting cramp in the FA cup......"He's a sub that's just come on!"

User avatar
Dave the rave
Member
Posts: 977
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 18:15
Location: Likes this

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Dave the rave » 24 Feb 2025 13:46

Sanguine
Stranded
Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.


This. Make it a minimum 10 minutes for that concussion assessment. After that time, if deemed fit, the player can return to the field.


Same for cramp. So much cramp around these days :roll:

Ally McCoist made me chuckle the other day with his reaction to a player getting cramp in the FA cup......"He's a sub that's just come on!"


Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3161
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Clyde1998 » 25 Feb 2025 08:37

Stranded
Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.

Not sure about a temporary sub personally, but certainly think the player should have to leave the pitch. If the player actually has a head injury, they'd be getting physio treatment and have to leave the pitch anyway.

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20496
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Stranded » 25 Feb 2025 08:47

Clyde1998
Stranded
Snowflake Royal It's wholly impractical, but it does make me think there should be an independent match doctor and physio, rather than ones for each club, who do medical and injury assessments, and can tell the ref when they think someone is faking, to earn them a post match sanction (post match so it can be properly disputed and countered with club medical evidence


Just do what they do in rugby.

If a player has a head injury, or feigns one, then you are allowed a temporary substitution whilst the player goes to the changing rooms for a head injury assessment. If he passes, he can return to the game, if he fails it, then the substitution becomes permanent.

If a player knows he'll have to leave the pitch if he fakes a head injury, it will soon stop.

Not sure about a temporary sub personally, but certainly think the player should have to leave the pitch. If the player actually has a head injury, they'd be getting physio treatment and have to leave the pitch anyway.


Fair enough.

They currently leave the pitch and come back on almost immediately. I'm suggesting giving a player a full check over to ensure they are OK to play - this can take 5 to 10 mins and needs to be done by an independant doctor. If football truly wants to take head injuries seriously, this is, in my mind, the best way forward - anything else is lip service.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6721
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by WestYorksRoyal » 25 Feb 2025 09:06

I think it makes obvious sense. Takes head injuries seriously while disincetivising fake ones. Go down to slow the game down? Off the pitch you go for a proper check and the game restarts immediately.

At the moment the ref has to stop the game for this behavior in case it's genuine.

katweslowski
Member
Posts: 386
Joined: 04 Jun 2023 05:04

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by katweslowski » 25 Feb 2025 09:31

What really drives me mad is hearing commentators saying the following - after about 3 replays showing it was a brush on the shoulder:

"Contact was minimal there"

No, there was no oxf*rd contact you arsewipe


User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12394
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by bcubed » 25 Feb 2025 09:39

katweslowski What really drives me mad is hearing commentators saying the following - after about 3 replays showing it was a brush on the shoulder:

"Contact was minimal there"

No, there was no oxf*rd contact you arsewipe


This is a big bugbear of mine. Commentators and experts, especially ex players should, imo, be highlighting play acting not supporting it. It has sadly become the norm that people think a slight touch warrants a foul.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 21688
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Sutekh » 25 Feb 2025 09:44

bcubed
katweslowski What really drives me mad is hearing commentators saying the following - after about 3 replays showing it was a brush on the shoulder:

"Contact was minimal there"

No, there was no oxf*rd contact you arsewipe


This is a big bugbear of mine. Commentators and experts, especially ex players should, imo, be highlighting play acting not supporting it. It has sadly become the norm that people think a slight touch warrants a foul.


Being saying it for years, it’s ridiculous the obvious feigning you get from some incidents yet the feigners very rarely get punished for it. Would much rather the authorities cracked down on that than yet more arsepiddling with handball interpretations and the offside law.

Always remember that footage from the early 70s where Francis Lee deliberately throws himself to the ground trying to make a point to the officials after the ref gave a free kick to Man United.











Last edited by Sutekh on 25 Feb 2025 09:58, edited 1 time in total.

katweslowski
Member
Posts: 386
Joined: 04 Jun 2023 05:04

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by katweslowski » 25 Feb 2025 09:56

Sutekh
bcubed This is a big bugbear of mine. Commentators and experts, especially ex players should, imo, be highlighting play acting not supporting it. It has sadly become the norm that people think a slight touch warrants a foul.


Being saying it for years, it’s ridiculous the obvious feigning you get from some incidents yet the feigners very rarely get punished for it. Would much rather the authorities cracked down on that than yet more arsepiddling with handball interpretations and the offside law.


Yarp... and that's why I have absolutely no sympathy or time for players or managers complaining about referees or bad decisions. Even when they're right.

Stop the cheating, stop trying to trick the referee as it seems absolutely ridiculous that they do this, then blame officials for not giving a decision in their favour.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 31715
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by leon » 25 Feb 2025 10:35

Sutekh
bcubed
katweslowski What really drives me mad is hearing commentators saying the following - after about 3 replays showing it was a brush on the shoulder:

"Contact was minimal there"

No, there was no oxf*rd contact you arsewipe


This is a big bugbear of mine. Commentators and experts, especially ex players should, imo, be highlighting play acting not supporting it. It has sadly become the norm that people think a slight touch warrants a foul.


Being saying it for years, it’s ridiculous the obvious feigning you get from some incidents yet the feigners very rarely get punished for it. Would much rather the authorities cracked down on that than yet more arsepiddling with handball interpretations and the offside law.

Always remember that footage from the early 70s where Francis Lee deliberately throws himself to the ground trying to make a point to the officials after the ref gave a free kick to Man United.













"Foreigners" FFS

I remember plenty of UK players chucking themselves on the floor. The Sainted Shearer used to alternately elbow and collapse in a heap.

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3887
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by rabidbee » 25 Feb 2025 10:36

_Feigners_ Leon, FEIGN-ers.

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12394
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by bcubed » 25 Feb 2025 12:17

rabidbee _Feigners_ Leon, FEIGN-ers.


:lol:

Jinx
Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:41

Re: MATCHWATCH : Birmingham City (h)

by Jinx » 25 Feb 2025 12:46

bcubed
katweslowski What really drives me mad is hearing commentators saying the following - after about 3 replays showing it was a brush on the shoulder:

"Contact was minimal there"

No, there was no oxf*rd contact you arsewipe


This is a big bugbear of mine. Commentators and experts, especially ex players should, imo, be highlighting play acting not supporting it. It has sadly become the norm that people think a slight touch warrants a foul.


Alan Shearer et al - "there's definitely contact, so he's entitled to go down"

145 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Freddy, Scutterbucketz and 227 guests

It is currently 12 Apr 2025 22:36