by Gordons Cumming » 25 Jul 2006 17:14
Y25 for what its worth i've signed anyway
by Compo's Hat » 26 Jul 2006 02:29
by Readingfanman » 26 Jul 2006 10:49
by HighburyRoyale » 26 Jul 2006 13:33
by royal.badger » 26 Jul 2006 13:47
by TFF » 26 Jul 2006 14:11
by bobby1413 » 26 Jul 2006 14:15
by johnnym » 26 Jul 2006 17:47
by Ooo Trevor Morley » 26 Jul 2006 17:49
by Ooo Trevor Morley » 26 Jul 2006 18:06
johnnym
i'm sure reading 107 will be no better, but i am amazed so many people are bothered about this.
by bracknell loyal royal! » 26 Jul 2006 18:43
by strap » 26 Jul 2006 19:01
PlatypussForbury Lion107 deny they have an exclusive agreement, although it will work out that way if nobody else comes to an agreement to buy the rights.RoyalBlue their subsequent decision to grant exclusive rights to a radio station (partly owned by the Chairman) with an extremely poor area of coverage in a contest that many suspect took place on a far from level playing field!
If they want to plausibly deny that they "negotiated" exclusive access, perhaps they should think about editing their own website?
http://www.reading107fm.com/page.pl?id=5
by Bowman's Quiver » 26 Jul 2006 19:13
strapPlatypussForbury Lion107 deny they have an exclusive agreement, although it will work out that way if nobody else comes to an agreement to buy the rights.RoyalBlue their subsequent decision to grant exclusive rights to a radio station (partly owned by the Chairman) with an extremely poor area of coverage in a contest that many suspect took place on a far from level playing field!
If they want to plausibly deny that they "negotiated" exclusive access, perhaps they should think about editing their own website?
http://www.reading107fm.com/page.pl?id=5
I like Independence Day too. "Plausible deniability" - quote of the decade!
On a more serious note, does JM's pathetic jibe (and I'm paraphrasing here) that "if the half a million or so listeners outside the 107fm area but inside BBCRB area each send him a pound he'd think about reinstating BBCRB" bother anybody else? Here is a man who has amassed a £325M fortune, loaned the club £40M odd to get it where it is today, and yet he can't see the offence he has caused by being a penny pinching spiteful little turd on the commentary issue?
Probably is just me, but frankly I get the impression that he is starting to belive his own hype. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and maybe, just maybe, he's taken RFC as far as he can or is prepared to. If he wants to retain the hero status he has achieved, perhaps now would be a good time to do some "serious networking" to find that rich buyer he keeps banging on about, rather than just talking about it and alienating himself from a good few tens of thousands fans.
Of course, it may well be that he personally had nothing to do with the whole commentary rights episode.
by Platypuss » 26 Jul 2006 19:17
by AthleticoSpizz » 26 Jul 2006 19:20
downright dishonourable and disrespectful, if you ask mePlatypuss Nah, his ill thought-out and misjudged remarks in the EP definitely look like those of a cornered man caught bang to rights.
by thefruits » 26 Jul 2006 19:25
by AthleticoSpizz » 26 Jul 2006 19:36
by bluehoops » 26 Jul 2006 20:46
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, LUX, SouthDownsRoyal and 227 guests