Long - time for a change?

810 posts
User avatar
Spud Gun
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 15:13
Location: I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you ...

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Spud Gun » 14 Dec 2010 14:29

Snowball Forgetting Long for a minute.

Hunt wasn't exactly brilliant v Leeds and Brendy says he was invisible v Coventry too.

Church has looked lost for a few games now.

And we had the surprise dropping of Zurab.




Is there something wrong in the dressing room or am I reading too much into this?


Whys is Noel Hunt getting slated on this thread? He had one chance versus Coventry and hit the target, and then Karacan nearly scored from the follow up. Hunt also put a fantastic ball into the box in the first half, which any mediocre striker would have got to (of course Shane Long was nowhere near it).

Long had 5 better chances to score against Coventry and could only manage to hit the outside of the woodwork. Shane Long is not a natural finisher ... he is a poor man's Emile Heskey ...

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 14:29

I think it's about time we had some money on this.

Yorkshire Royal
Member
Posts: 630
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:02

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Yorkshire Royal » 14 Dec 2010 14:30

Money on how shit he is?

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Hoop Blah » 14 Dec 2010 14:33

Snowball
Hoop Blah Stats just can't show you the ease or importance of those chances or the situation in the game that they arose. When you accept that you'll realise why Long gets the grief he does.



Like Karacan's open goals? Like Hunt passing to the keeper v Leeds?


Or like Hunts deft finishes for crucial goals? Or Karacan stunner at Preston?

Nobody is saying other players do not miss chances, or good chances, but Long is the main culprit and is the player in the side who's job it is, more than any others, to get and take such chances. A job he just isn't doing.

Karacan has had plenty of stick on here over the last two seasons for giving up possession too easily, Pearce for being too slow, Kebe for slicing crosses out of play off his shin blah blah blah.

You act like criticism isn't allowed or that Long is the only one who gets it. Live in the real world a bit and accept that he isn't doing his job as well as most people would expect. For that reason he's had criticism and you're endless barage of stats (which people who have supported Long have ended up arguing against) have not help the situation of his criticism on here!!!

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Wycombe Royal » 14 Dec 2010 14:42

In the Coventry game NHunt had one very good chance and he forced the keeper in to a save.

Karacan had one very good chance (the rebound from NHunt's chance) and it was cleared off the line.

Shane Long had FOUR very good chances (plus another one he was stretching to reach) and he failed to hit the target with ALL of them.

The prosecution rests.


Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 14:43

Spud Gun
Whys is Noel Hunt getting slated on this thread? He had one chance versus Coventry and hit the target, and then Karacan nearly scored from the follow up. Hunt also put a fantastic ball into the box in the first half, which any mediocre striker would have got to (of course Shane Long was nowhere near it).



I like Noel Hunt a lot, but the above is "interesting".

If that had been Long it would be:

"Long SHOULD BE getting slated. He only managed one chance versus Coventry and and couldn't score when really he should have.
And PLEASE don't tall me he did well oputisde the box. It's his job to score goals. END OF."

It's Noel Hunt's job to score goals too.
It's Noel Hunt's job to get into the right places and get shots on target that become goals.

He has played 7 (10) = 9 and has managed to get a shot or header away just 19 times for 3 goals. Long has had 38 chances from 19 starts, so despite all the knee-jerkers saying Hunt is a natural and gets into the right places, Long doesn't, the actual statistics tell a different tale.

Long is managing two chances per game. Hunt is managing 2 chances per game

Yes, of course, Long is not scoring enough this season. Hunt is better but only converting 1 in 6.33

Long's career stats (including this bad run) are 160 shot/headers for 33 goals, converting 1 in 4.8

Prior to this season he was 121 shots for for 29 goals, a conversion rate of 1 in 4.1

The truth is, for whatever reason, all the players are poor in front of goal this season

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 14:44

Yorkshire Royal Money on how shit he is?



Money on how many goals he will score this season

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 14:48

Wycombe Royal In the Coventry game NHunt had one very good chance and he forced the keeper in to a save.


Translation into Long-Speak. He had a very good chance and FAILED AGAIN. Then throw in the sitter missed against Leeds.

Wycombe Royal Karacan had one very good chance (the rebound from NHunt's chance) and it was cleared off the line.

Then throw in the missed open goal against Watford.



Translation into Long-Speak. With the keeper nowhere and just one player on the line he still couldn't score.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Wycombe Royal » 14 Dec 2010 14:49

Snowball
Wycombe Royal In the Coventry game NHunt had one very good chance and he forced the keeper in to a save.


Translation into Long-Speak. He had a very good chance and FAILED AGAIN. Then throw in the sitter missed against Leeds.

Wycombe Royal Karacan had one very good chance (the rebound from NHunt's chance) and it was cleared off the line.

Then throw in the missed open goal against Watford.



Translation into Long-Speak. With the keeper nowhere and just one player on the line he still couldn't score.

If you say so, but unfortuntely we don't have to translate's Long's in to Long speak because he didn't hit the target.


Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 15:02

I don't judge players over a few games.

Church had a sudden burst of goals-as-a-sub and was the Second Coming. Yet the last few games he has looked quite poor. So is he The second Coming or rubbish, or last year's very good prospect with 12 goals from 29.5 games?

Hunt had a brief flurry too, but before that looked way off touch, and since is not exactly Mr Fantastic. And last year a crock. But then he matched Doyle, bettered him in goals for minutes on the pitch, back in 2008-09. Which Hunt should I consider?

Long has not been great in front of goal this year, but in every other season he has been VERY solid and an accurate finisher, MORE deadly than Doyle. He still has good overall figures. Which Long should I consider? The one on a relatively poor run playing "solo" when it doesn't suit him, a run that could turn round with 1-2 goals in a game followed by a couple more goals, just like has happened in the two previous seasons?

Most listers here just have to blame an individual. Long does loads of good work running in the channels, making chances, chasing down lost causes. He's been actively involved in a third of our league goals. The energy of Long and Karacan combined is probably not far off the rest of the team put together.

Of course he's mis-hitting, but take him out of the side, and replace him with for example, Rasiak. Yes, MAYBE we'd have had more finishing, but how many minutes less would we have had the ball, how many times would opposition defenders have had time to look up and find a better pass because Rasiak was ambling around?

Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Gordons Cumming » 14 Dec 2010 15:03

Maybe someone, other than Snowball, should come up with some statistics saying Long is a good player and then we'll see him scoring goals again.

Worth a try........

User avatar
Wimb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4399
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 09:43
Location: www.thetilehurstend.com

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Wimb » 14 Dec 2010 15:06

Gordons Cumming Maybe someone, other than Snowball, should come up with some statistics saying Long is a good player and then we'll see him scoring goals again.

Worth a try........


Long is a good player just not a great goalscorer.

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7369
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Alan Partridge » 14 Dec 2010 15:08

Wimb
Gordons Cumming Maybe someone, other than Snowball, should come up with some statistics saying Long is a good player and then we'll see him scoring goals again.

Worth a try........


Long is a good player just not a great goalscorer.


Long time for a change...of position.

I nominate centre half. He's got stronger, he's quick, and as most of his headers and shots end up in row z, might be better used as clearances?


User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Wycombe Royal » 14 Dec 2010 15:12

Snowball Most listers here just have to blame an individual. Long does loads of good work running in the channels, making chances, chasing down lost causes. He's been actively involved in a third of our league goals. The energy of Long and Karacan combined is probably not far off the rest of the team put together.

Of course he's mis-hitting, but take him out of the side, and replace him with for example, Rasiak. Yes, MAYBE we'd have had more finishing, but how many minutes less would we have had the ball, how many times would opposition defenders have had time to look up and find a better pass because Rasiak was ambling around?

THis is what I wrote on a diferent topic earlier today, it is not about blaming Long, hating Long, etc......

We need a consistent striker and not one who only scores consistently for two months of the season. I would like to see this striker play ALONGSIDE Long as he provides so many other attributes to the team.

Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6050
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Mr Angry » 14 Dec 2010 17:23

T.R.O.L.I. ^ hopefully - although I fear an avalanche of pro-Long stats when he finally gets round to reading this thread.



And there they are..................................................

:lol:

I repeat; why does every oxf*rd thread on here became a Snowball stat-wank???

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 17:26

You call this a stat fest?

You probably think your dick is six inches long.

User avatar
Harpers So Solid Crew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5273
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 08:39
Location: enjoying the money

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Harpers So Solid Crew » 14 Dec 2010 17:30

Christ Long even gets mentioned in dick size.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 17:33

Mr Angry
T.R.O.L.I. ^ hopefully - although I fear an avalanche of pro-Long stats when he finally gets round to reading this thread.



And there they are..................................................

I repeat; why does every oxf*rd thread on here became a Snowball stat-oxf*rd???


Six PAGES and six stats posts. The first stats post was cmonurz. The second was T.R.O.L.I.
The third and fourth were mine citing Henry's goals and Shearer's goals after facaldaqui asked.

Yeah stat-overload

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Ian Royal » 14 Dec 2010 18:41

And 26 posts of your usual drivel in 4 pages - out of about 80 posts, that's more than 40% why don't you just STFU before you wear your fingers down to bloody stumps.

Edit: 28 in 5 pages. Me 6 in 6. Yeah, I'm definitely the one with the problem there.
Last edited by Ian Royal on 14 Dec 2010 22:12, edited 1 time in total.

LoyalRoyalFan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4942
Joined: 20 Jan 2008 10:18
Location: Reading

Re: Long - time for a change?

by LoyalRoyalFan » 14 Dec 2010 18:55

Send him out on loan.

810 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Dirk Gently, Google Adsense [Bot], Mr Angry, muirinho, tmesis and 255 guests

It is currently 18 Feb 2025 17:02