AthleticoSpizz Phew 91...i saw your post (pre-edit there)
Yeh sorry dude I got confused with the quotations there haha!
by Royal91 » 06 Jan 2013 01:20
AthleticoSpizz Phew 91...i saw your post (pre-edit there)
by AthleticoSpizz » 06 Jan 2013 01:21
by RoyalTank » 06 Jan 2013 01:46
by Millsy » 06 Jan 2013 02:03
SPARTA Harte was woeful.
by Royal91 » 06 Jan 2013 02:12
2 world wars, 1 world cupSPARTA Harte was woeful.
Why does this not surprise me, even at this level?
Any team that does two minutes of homework sees our Achilles chasm.
It seems Crawley only took 10seconds to figure it out with an attack down our left side I understand?
A left back is quite possibly our biggest priority I am beginning to feel. It doesnt matter how good you are if youre not there to do your job, except for perhaps a CB and keeper. We need a pacey left back. We cannot have the embarrassment if putting kebe on the left to cover for a statue of a left back, or the idiocy of keeping nothing but ageing left backs as our only options.
Remember when Matt Robinson coming in changed our fortunes overnight? New left back immediately please Brian.
by WestRoyal » 06 Jan 2013 02:49
urz13 I was on the left side of the terrace and all was good natured and focused on the football. Such a shame to see that even in the modern age there is still a (very) small minority of idiots who still feel that causing trouble is a necessity and don't come to support the team.
Good performance in the end though:
Feds - 6
Cummings - 6 should have had definite pen/FK
Pearce - 7 sign him up
Morrison - 6 passing off
Harte - 5 not his best
McCleary - 8 not a fan but excellent today. Still can't cross for shit
Karacan - 7 good
Tabb - 7 good to have him back in the side
HRK - 8 worked really hard
ALF - 8 MOTM and could've had a hattrick on several occasions
Hunt - 7 works really well with any striking partner
Guthrie - 6 some classy passes, some shocking passes
Gunter - 5 no time to do anything
Quick mention of the linesman who was absolutely useless and seemed to have had one to many lies over the festive period.
by steve leake » 06 Jan 2013 07:54
by .:BigDaveInTheDungeon:. » 06 Jan 2013 08:09
by Avon Royal » 06 Jan 2013 08:18
Para HandyAvon Royal Parahandy jizzing into his sock tonight - it's just like the good old days...........
Erm, care to clarify what you mean there? I'm not aware that I've ever posted anything that could justify that remark.
Para Handy I'm guessing I'll batter the pcunt shortly
by URZZZZZZZZ » 06 Jan 2013 08:31
by Huntley & Palmer » 06 Jan 2013 08:40
by Maguire » 06 Jan 2013 08:56
by Irvinchangeyaname » 06 Jan 2013 09:23
steve leake if we get a forward look forward to seeing you in the championship (I hope)
by Thames » 06 Jan 2013 09:50
by Simon's Church » 06 Jan 2013 09:54
by MmmMonsterMunch » 06 Jan 2013 10:13
Barney Incredible.
On hobnob, some posters slag off the fans for following 'family friendly' RFC. Then the SAME posters slag off the fans for being a bit laddish and having a few beers.
Let me spell it out for you. Particularly for those posters that don't attend many games. Primarily, RFC has turned itself into predominantly a 'family' club. BUT...there is, and always will be, an element of both older ( circa 1970s) and newer 'lads' that follow Reading.
No different from most/all Prem clubs and most/all towns or cities with a quarter of a million residents.
It happens. It will ALWAYS happen. Reading is a big town. A lot of older and younger 'lads' follow Reading. No different from the majority of other clubs
that are either in the Prem or have a town/city size similar to Reading.
For those that think otherwise, you are living in a land of make believe.
Aldershot away. Ler's have it.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Jan 2013 10:19
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Jan 2013 10:26
by Royal Lady » 06 Jan 2013 10:43
by Royal Lady » 06 Jan 2013 10:46
MmmMonsterMunchBarney Incredible.
On hobnob, some posters slag off the fans for following 'family friendly' RFC. Then the SAME posters slag off the fans for being a bit laddish and having a few beers.
Let me spell it out for you. Particularly for those posters that don't attend many games. Primarily, RFC has turned itself into predominantly a 'family' club. BUT...there is, and always will be, an element of both older ( circa 1970s) and newer 'lads' that follow Reading.
No different from most/all Prem clubs and most/all towns or cities with a quarter of a million residents.
It happens. It will ALWAYS happen. Reading is a big town. A lot of older and younger 'lads' follow Reading. No different from the majority of other clubs
that are either in the Prem or have a town/city size similar to Reading.
For those that think otherwise, you are living in a land of make believe.
Aldershot away. Ler's have it.
Oooh aren't you the hardman? Tw@t
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Snowflake Royal and 285 guests