paultheroyalMr Angry The referee's report into the red card incident would make interesting reading!
IMHO the red card wasn't for Crook's initial challenge; it was because once it was clear that Southwood had the ball, Crooks, despite seeing that, continued to try to get to it and ended up sticking his foot into Southwood's chest - endangering the opponent = red card.
This picture shows that:
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/s ... h-red-card
Goodman has never liked Reading, so his opinion about any incident is always that our opponents (whoever they are) should have had the decision go their way.
Glad you said that because from a refereeing perspective that’s exactly what I saw. He definitely continues to push and twist that leg in. Total unnatural movement in that situation, had intent, red card. If reported as such it won’t be overturned.
That's what I saw as well from a hundred yards away. The Sky replay stops in the middle of that extra movement, so it left me wondering if I was imagining things, so it is good to see your two posts.
It wouldn't surprise me if it was overturned - red cards aren't that fashionable at the moment - but if won't rob me of the sheer enjoyment of watching a Warnock player getting a red card on Saturday.