NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Doyle to Wolves for £6.5m

[Royalee]

We'll see how you get on next season.

OK - how about we have a little wager - if Wolves get relegated, I'll give £10 to a charity of your choice - if we stay up, you pay £10 to one of mine.

Deal.

[Wolfatthedoor]

We'll see how you get on next season.

OK - how about we have a little wager - if Wolves get relegated, I'll give £10 to a charity of your choice - if we stay up, you pay £10 to one of mine.

Deal.

Good - just hope nobody else jumps on it - could bankrupt me!

[PEARCEY]

I can see Doyle going to Wolves. Wouldn't surprise me at all if Doyle went for £5 million.
As for the argument that he wouldn't fancy going to Wolves as they will go back down again I dont agree. Think Wolves will survive next season and beyond in the Prem.
Good luck to them. Decent club IMO.

[Smoking Kills Dancing Doe]

Does remind me a lot of when we tried to get Lescott off you guys.

But we all thought someone bigger than Stoke would come in for Kitson and they never did and everyone thought someone would bid for Hunt in Jan and they never did.

BTW have Wolves fans seen S Hunt? Great player, would do a fantastic job for you guys. We'll just swap him for Kightly, day light robbery for you guys, but we'll let you off with it just cause Hunt as given this club so much.

Good luck next season, like Big Mick, comes across very funny in the media, esp after ur game here last season!!

[Deathy]

I can see Doyle going to Wolves. Wouldn't surprise me at all if Doyle went for £5 million.
As for the argument that he wouldn't fancy going to Wolves as they will go back down again I dont agree. Think Wolves will survive next season and beyond in the Prem.
Good luck to them. Decent club IMO.

Well, as the release clause is at £6.5m, I'd be surprised!

It is a decent club though, despite the vast majority of its fans sharing the same mother, and having one eye higher than the other.

[soggy biscuit]

Well, as the release clause is at £6.5m, I'd be surprised!

I wouldn't at all, just because that is his release clause it doesn't mean they won't take less.

[SteveRoyal]

Which has nothing to do with your original point.

Wow, who yanked your chain? Chill.

[Ian Royal]

OK - how about we have a little wager - if Wolves get relegated, I'll give £10 to a charity of your choice - if we stay up, you pay £10 to one of mine.

Deal.

Good - just hope nobody else jumps on it - could bankrupt me!

Personally I think you need to be putting some thought into the charity you're choosing. Because I suspect in a year's time they will be £10 better off.

[gazzer, loyal royal]

i can confirm wolves have triggered his buy out clause at 6.5m

however, there is another established prem league in for him who have done the same

[leww_rfc]

i can confirm wolves have triggered his buy out clause at 6.5m

however, there is another established prem league in for him who have done the same

then he'll go to the other club.

[loyalroyal4life]

i can confirm wolves have triggered his buy out clause at 6.5m

however, there is another established prem league in for him who have done the same

source?

[rg6royal]

apple

[Plymouth_Royal]

Does remind me a lot of when we tried to get Lescott off you guys.

But we all thought someone bigger than Stoke would come in for Kitson and they never did and everyone thought someone would bid for Hunt in Jan and they never did.

BTW have Wolves fans seen S Hunt? Great player, would do a fantastic job for you guys. We'll just swap him for Kightly, day light robbery for you guys, but we'll let you off with it just cause Hunt as given this club so much.

Good luck next season, like Big Mick, comes across very funny in the media, esp after ur game here last season!!

there were bids for hunt. I think it was hammond saying that the club agreed a fee with a club but hunt didnt want to go to them.

[West Stand Man]

Well, as the release clause is at £6.5m, I'd be surprised!

I wouldn't at all, just because that is his release clause it doesn't mean they won't take less.

Do get real. Why on earth would a club let their top striker go for less that the agreed release value? The only possible reason I can imagine is to reduce the wage bill - but they have only just negotiated his contract this year and so it is reasonable to assume that it was affordable.

[Ian Royal]

It's not like Doyle is the sort to be really pushing for a move either.

[soggy biscuit]

Well, as the release clause is at £6.5m, I'd be surprised!

I wouldn't at all, just because that is his release clause it doesn't mean they won't take less.

Do get real. Why on earth would a club let their top striker go for less that the agreed release value?

and now back in the real world.....

[Plymouth_Royal]

Well, as the release clause is at £6.5m, I'd be surprised!

I wouldn't at all, just because that is his release clause it doesn't mean they won't take less.

Do get real. Why on earth would a club let their top striker go for less that the agreed release value? The only possible reason I can imagine is to reduce the wage bill - but they have only just negotiated his contract this year and so it is reasonable to assume that it was affordable.

roque santa cruz.

20 million release clause goes for 18million.

Only reason i can see is that the player wants to leave so an offer close to his clause would be hard to turn down.

[soggy biscuit]

Do get real. Why on earth would a club let their top striker go for less that the agreed release value?

roque santa cruz.

20 million release clause goes for 18million.

Yep, happens all the time. No idea what WSM is on about, maybe Championship Manager doesn't allow it to happen or something.

[Ian Royal]

Maybe Santa Cruz wanted to go?

Given recent history there is no reason to think we'll let Doyle go for less than his release clause.

[papereyes]

BTW have Wolves fans seen S Hunt? Great player, would do a fantastic job for you guys. We'll just swap him for Kightly, day light robbery for you guys, but we'll let you off with it just cause Hunt as given this club so much.