Long - time for a change?

810 posts
User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Ian Royal » 14 Dec 2010 18:59

LoyalRoyalFan Send him out on loan.


1) we can't
2) that'd leave us with two strikers
3) he's not going to agree to drop a division and no one else who'd actually be useful for him to go to and play is going to take him.
4) that'd definitely shatter what remains of his confidence.

Way, way too late to do that. By at least two seasons.

LoyalRoyalFan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4942
Joined: 20 Jan 2008 10:18
Location: Reading

Re: Long - time for a change?

by LoyalRoyalFan » 14 Dec 2010 19:01

Ian Royal
LoyalRoyalFan Send him out on loan.


1) we can't
2) that'd leave us with two strikers
3) he's not going to agree to drop a division and no one else who'd actually be useful for him to go to and play is going to take him.
4) that'd definitely shatter what remains of his confidence.

Way, way too late to do that. By at least two seasons.


1) I'm sure a number of other teams would be prepared to have him.
2) Loan him out and bring in Bignall/Mooney and a replacement.
3) Force him. He's the not the whole team.
4) Scoring goals should increase his confidence.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Ian Royal » 14 Dec 2010 19:12

Ahh I see, you mean loan him out in January. Not a great help for now and I think it's a little unlikely that forcing him to go on loan and drop a division is going to be a great motivator for him to come back play well and score goals for us.

Bignall's barely played any games even on loan and Mooney has been a pretty duff signing. I'd rather have Long. :shock:

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20781
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 20:26

Ian Royal And 26 posts of your usual drivel in 4 pages - out of about 80 posts, that's more than 40% why don't you just STFU before you wear your fingers down to bloody stumps.


You are such a girlie

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20781
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 14 Dec 2010 20:31

(2.98% of all posts / 7.75 posts per day) Ian Royal (99% bollox, judges games on radio)

(0.75% of all posts / 6.72 posts per day) Snowball (09% bollox. Erudite, intelligent, known to actually watch live games)


georgerob
Member
Posts: 218
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 22:01
Location: Newbury

Re: Long - time for a change?

by georgerob » 14 Dec 2010 21:02

Its worth starting Church and Hunt upfront against Derby as Long is out of form. Although this could destroy Long's confidence, I remember in the championship winning season and in the premier league Long was mainly used as a substitute and was deployed as an impact substitute which he was effective at. Many occasions Long came off the bench and positively changed the game in Reading's favour. I think over previous seasons Long has a decent scoring record against Derby though?

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Long - time for a change?

by sandman » 14 Dec 2010 23:06

Wenger was a dignified loser. ‘If you look at the stats, it’s a mystery how we lost the game,’ he said. Then he realised how hollow that sounded, since football is about far more than the simplicities of statistics.

‘We put ourselves in the right position, and we failed,’ he said. ‘That is something which is difficult to swallow, but we have to accept it’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z1884d7Zwk

Even Wenger accepts that in football stats don't tell the whole story Snowball, why can't you?

Victor Meldrew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6716
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 19:22
Location: South Coast

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2010 17:11

As somebody posted elsewhere he noticed that after missing those chances Long was smiling.
It's not something that I have noticed particularly before and may be nothing but I also get the impression that Church isn't too concerned if he misses a chance,it doesn't seem to hurt( based only on his body language and nothing else more substantial).
Maybe these players are in a comfort zone-unlike in many jobs they still get paid even if they have done their job badly and at the moment our 3 know that they will be in the squad every week however poorly they have been performing.

Brian does need to shake things up because we are definitely on a bit of a slide and the first thing he really should do is to drop Long-you cannot go into every game keeping your fingers crossed that something just might happen.
Is there not a taller 17,18,19 year old knocking around in our youth set-up?
Clubs do actually blood young players (look at Watford last weekend)even if to play only a couple of games and I'm sure they are hungry to get a chance whereas our current 3 are too comfortable for their own good and more importantly for the good of the club.

User avatar
facaldaqui
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1937
Joined: 17 Dec 2004 05:10

Re: Long - time for a change?

by facaldaqui » 15 Dec 2010 17:38

Victor Meldrew As somebody posted elsewhere he noticed that after missing those chances Long was smiling.
It's not something that I have noticed particularly before and may be nothing but I also get the impression that Church isn't too concerned if he misses a chance,it doesn't seem to hurt( based only on his body language and nothing else more substantial).


One thing I really do not like about Church is his goal celebrations. OK, he doesn't do his Bristol act any more, but I find something peculiarly odious about his chest-out posing after a goal (to be fair, he was more sheepish after the mishit goal). I don't like arrogant goal celebrations at the best of times, but at least the likes of Cantona had earned the right to strut like a ponce; Church hasn't.


User avatar
super darren caskey
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1059
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 20:04
Location: Newbury

Re: Long - time for a change?

by super darren caskey » 15 Dec 2010 17:50

Well its just as well you dont have to sit through is goal celebrations very often then...unfortunatley

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Ian Royal » 15 Dec 2010 19:01

Long's expression seemed to me to be more a wry smile asking what he had to do to score a goal. The answer is pretty obvious: Hit the oxf*rd target occasionally, without putting it straight at the keeper.

Victor Meldrew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6716
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 19:22
Location: South Coast

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2010 20:04

Ian Royal Long's expression seemed to me to be more a wry smile asking what he had to do to score a goal. The answer is pretty obvious: Hit the oxf*rd target occasionally, without putting it straight at the keeper.


If it is a wry smile it is usually because normally you expect the ball to hit the back of the net.
Shane has no such expectations so I presume it might have been wind.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Long - time for a change?

by FiNeRaIn » 15 Dec 2010 21:19

Shane long in front of goal.



DEEEEEEnied.


User avatar
SLAMMED
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7514
Joined: 19 May 2008 16:12
Location: Let's leave before the lights come on

Re: Long - time for a change?

by SLAMMED » 15 Dec 2010 23:59

Too skinny to be Long.

Wide and Wonderful
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 11:37
Location: I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Wide and Wonderful » 16 Dec 2010 23:35

Derby this weekend. Long has a particularly good goals record against Derby - 5 goals in 8 games against them? (And a red card I think?)

A goal or two against a team he seems to have success against could spur him on.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20781
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Snowball » 16 Dec 2010 23:49

5 is right


3 Goals in 42 Minutes 2005-06

and another one in 2008-09

and another one in 2009-10

Wide and Wonderful
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 11:37
Location: I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

Re: Long - time for a change?

by Wide and Wonderful » 16 Dec 2010 23:58

Snowball 5 is right


3 Goals in 42 Minutes 2005-06

and another one in 2008-09

and another one in 2009-10


Well let's hope for a few more on Saturday!

User avatar
Cookie
Member
Posts: 989
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 20:17
Location: Where troubles melt like lemon drops

Long wait is over

by Cookie » 18 Dec 2010 17:23

Get in there my son!



We never EVER doubted you! :D :D :D :D

rollsy
Member
Posts: 116
Joined: 11 Nov 2004 18:10
Location: Glasgow

Re: Long wait is over

by rollsy » 18 Dec 2010 17:47

Cookie Get in there my son!



We never EVER doubted you! :D :D :D :D


+1

User avatar
T.R.O.L.I.
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6526
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 14:47
Location: 2 down, far right - Still recovering from the weekend's excesses

Re: Long - time for a change?

by T.R.O.L.I. » 18 Dec 2010 18:01

Well, there we go - finally Long remembers where the back of the net is and doubles his tally from open play for the season.

I really hope that this will kick start a good scoring run for him - as I said in my opening post, his workrate up to the 18 yard box is unquestionable so the only thing that has been missing is goals.

However, I am still reserving judgement until he does go on a decent scoring run as "one swallow does not make a summer". Still, a very welcome 3 points and the league table makes good reading tonight!!

810 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 247 guests

It is currently 23 May 2025 03:07