by Forbury Lion »
16 Jun 2016 11:53
paddy20 He could have remained silent. I would have thought JM deserved at least that after their long relationship. He didn't need to belittle him.
Maybe he didn't enjoy working for JM and wasn't treated well?
He should have said nothing and spoken to JM in private. I assume NH was asked a direct question by the media and therefore he should give an honest answer but the "even for him" dig at the end that was necessary and a clear shot at JM.
JM should remember it was NH who got BR sacked, He could run to the shareholders and pull the same threat with JM, although since JM isn't on the payroll they can't sack him, only cut him off. There is also the chance the Thai's might welcome NH's resignation threat so they replace him with someone with no experience from Holland.