Good Old Kits

[The whole year inn]

What can you dedeuce from his actions then?

Perhaps I should have let this one go

I love you

[Schards#2]

In my book driving whilst under the influence is the same as attempted manslaughter (if there was such a thing), just because you haven't done a Lee Hughes yet doesn't me you won't, by getting behind the wheel of a car when over the limit you are saying you'll take the risk with someone elses life (whether that be a person you run over or your family having to cope with you as a vegetable after a crash). Drink/Drugged driving = Utter C*NT.

That said if Kitson was sober and refused to take the test on principal then he is just about stupid enough that he deserves any punishment he is given!

Lee Hughes scarpered from the scene leaving a dying man.

Any comparison between this and what Kitson has done EVEN IN THE WORST POSSIBLE CIRCUMSTANCES is utterly ridiculous and totally inappropriate.

[T.R.O.L.I.]

What can you dedeuce from his actions then?

Perhaps I should have let this one go

I love you

It could be a match made in heaven...

[Hahnemann's Hairdresser]

No, not in the slightest. Like Kitson, Lita has never been convicted of anything. And if my memory serves me rightly (it may not!) he has only been charged with one offence (which was dropped). Add to that that some of Lita’s transgressions, like the web incident, are not crimes at all, and I don’t see how Lita’s situation is any different.

Getting in fights week in week out in Bristol is the same as Kitson????

Says who? Has he been convicted of disorder?

Havn't you heard? Leroy can be found filming himself windmilling his way round Bristol town center every weekend laying into anyone who crosses his path. He leaves a tornado like trail of destruction before finishing the act by performing a flying headbutt across the bar at closing time, week in, week out, regular as clockwork.

Fact of the day - Leroy Lita has never been convicted of a criminal offence, and was acquitted of the only charge bought against him.

[zac naloen]

No, not in the slightest. Like Kitson, Lita has never been convicted of anything. And if my memory serves me rightly (it may not!) he has only been charged with one offence (which was dropped). Add to that that some of Lita’s transgressions, like the web incident, are not crimes at all, and I don’t see how Lita’s situation is any different.

Getting in fights week in week out in Bristol is the same as Kitson????

Says who? Has he been convicted of disorder?

Havn't you heard? Leroy can be found filming himself windmilling his way round Bristol town center every weekend laying into anyone who crosses his path. He leaves a tornado like trail of destruction before finishing the act by performing a flying headbutt across the bar at closing time, week in, week out, regular as clockwork.

Fact of the day - Leroy Lita has never been convicted of a criminal offence, and was acquitted of the only charge bought against him.

He wasn't aquitted. It was settled out of court.

[Uke]

Fact of the day - Leroy Lita has never been convicted of a criminal offence, and was acquitted of the only charge bought against him.

Charges were not pressed by the guy who's bruised face was printed in several papers. This does not mean acquitted.

[Hahnemann's Hairdresser]

No, not in the slightest. Like Kitson, Lita has never been convicted of anything. And if my memory serves me rightly (it may not!) he has only been charged with one offence (which was dropped). Add to that that some of Lita’s transgressions, like the web incident, are not crimes at all, and I don’t see how Lita’s situation is any different.

Getting in fights week in week out in Bristol is the same as Kitson????

Says who? Has he been convicted of disorder?

Havn't you heard? Leroy can be found filming himself windmilling his way round Bristol town center every weekend laying into anyone who crosses his path. He leaves a tornado like trail of destruction before finishing the act by performing a flying headbutt across the bar at closing time, week in, week out, regular as clockwork.

Fact of the day - Leroy Lita has never been convicted of a criminal offence, and was acquitted of the only charge bought against him.

He wasn't aquitted. It was settled out of court.

LOL at me.

Either way you get the point, he has never been convicted of an offence.

[Fezza]

In my book driving whilst under the influence is the same as attempted manslaughter

LOL

Internet access day at Broadmoor I see. Don't use all your weekly spends at once Fezza

I fail to see your point. If your drunk when driving a vehicle it is because you have made a concious decision to get in and drive knowing that you are breaking a law designed to save lives. Whether you have an fatal "accident" or not is immaterial, the risk is still there. The fact that Lee Hughes fled the scene makes him a sh*t but if I was really pissed and did the same thing I'm not certain I'd be thinking rationally either. That is why the law is there. I have no time for someone on Kitsons money who does this when they could very easily afford a taxi. The man is a Moron and should, if he was actually drunk, be made to give all his wages for the rest of the season to a charity for the victims of pissed drivers.

[Huntley & Palmer]

Well at least it explains some of his comments recently.

[Fezza]

In my book driving whilst under the influence is the same as attempted manslaughter (if there was such a thing), just because you haven't done a Lee Hughes yet doesn't me you won't, by getting behind the wheel of a car when over the limit you are saying you'll take the risk with someone elses life (whether that be a person you run over or your family having to cope with you as a vegetable after a crash). Drink/Drugged driving = Utter C*NT.

That said if Kitson was sober and refused to take the test on principal then he is just about stupid enough that he deserves any punishment he is given!

Lee Hughes scarpered from the scene leaving a dying man.

Any comparison between this and what Kitson has done EVEN IN THE WORST POSSIBLE CIRCUMSTANCES is utterly ridiculous and totally inappropriate.

I fail to agree - but that's opinion for you!

Just because a man kills someone and then stops hand try's to help doesn't absolve him of the crime, neither in my opinion does getting away with not hitting anyone but still being over the limit.

I'm sorry if you don't agree with me, it is really just my point of view and there are probably a lot of valid reasons for driving when drunk that I am unaware of!

[Royal Rother]

Does Kitson's sponsored car have his name splashed across it?

[zac naloen]

In my book driving whilst under the influence is the same as attempted manslaughter (if there was such a thing), just because you haven't done a Lee Hughes yet doesn't me you won't, by getting behind the wheel of a car when over the limit you are saying you'll take the risk with someone elses life (whether that be a person you run over or your family having to cope with you as a vegetable after a crash). Drink/Drugged driving = Utter C*NT.

That said if Kitson was sober and refused to take the test on principal then he is just about stupid enough that he deserves any punishment he is given!

Lee Hughes scarpered from the scene leaving a dying man.

Any comparison between this and what Kitson has done EVEN IN THE WORST POSSIBLE CIRCUMSTANCES is utterly ridiculous and totally inappropriate.

I fail to agree - but that's opinion for you!

Just because a man kills someone and then stops hand try's to help doesn't absolve him of the crime, neither in my opinion does getting away with not hitting anyone but still being over the limit.

I'm sorry if you don't agree with me, it is really just my point of view and there are probably a lot of valid reasons for driving when drunk that I am unaware of!

Running away from the accident is more of a crime than staying at the scene. It doesn't make you any less responsible but it does make you less of a twat.

[Skin]

No, not in the slightest. Like Kitson, Lita has never been convicted of anything. And if my memory serves me rightly (it may not!) he has only been charged with one offence (which was dropped). Add to that that some of Lita’s transgressions, like the web incident, are not crimes at all, and I don’t see how Lita’s situation is any different.

Getting in fights week in week out in Bristol is the same as Kitson????

Yes because that's exactly what Lita does. Knob.

[Scylla]

In my book driving whilst under the influence is the same as attempted manslaughter

LOL

Internet access day at Broadmoor I see. Don't use all your weekly spends at once Fezza

I fail to see your point. If your drunk when driving a vehicle it is because you have made a concious decision to get in and drive knowing that you are breaking a law designed to save lives. Whether you have an fatal "accident" or not is immaterial, the risk is still there. The fact that Lee Hughes fled the scene makes him a sh*t but if I was really pissed and did the same thing I'm not certain I'd be thinking rationally either. That is why the law is there. I have no time for someone on Kitsons money who does this when they could very easily afford a taxi. The man is a Moron and should, if he was actually drunk, be made to give all his wages for the rest of the season to a charity for the victims of pissed drivers.

Don't drink and post

[JimmytheJim]

I have been one of Dave Kitson's biggest fans, and I can't deny how disappointed I am about this incident. Drink-driving is extraordinarily selfish and irresponsible, and a far cry from the decent, upstanding fellow he portrays himself to be. However, just as I didn't jump on the Lita bandwagon, nor will I join in the Kitson-bashing. Yes, it was idiotic, and stupid, and he ought to do the honourable thing and make a charitable donation to a related cause as penance. But it was a one-off (hopefully), a mistake, and one I am sure many of you have been strongly tempted to make in the past. There's not a lot to be gained from lambasting him, unless you happen to be a fan of any of the teams below us in the Premier league.

Or a tw*t with a serious QPR problem.

[The whole year inn]

In my book driving whilst under the influence is the same as attempted manslaughter

LOL

Internet access day at Broadmoor I see. Don't use all your weekly spends at once Fezza

The man is a Moron and should, if he was actually drunk, be made to give all his wages for the rest of the season to a charity for the victims of pissed drivers.

[Schards#2]

I have been one of Dave Kitson's biggest fans, and I can't deny how disappointed I am about this incident. Drink-driving is extraordinarily selfish and irresponsible, and a far cry from the decent, upstanding fellow he portrays himself to be. However, just as I didn't jump on the Lita bandwagon, nor will I join in the Kitson-bashing. Yes, it was idiotic, and stupid, and he ought to do the honourable thing and make a charitable donation to a related cause as penance. But it was a one-off (hopefully), a mistake, and one I am sure many of you have been strongly tempted to make in the past. There's not a lot to be gained from lambasting him, unless you happen to be a fan of any of the teams below us in the Premier league.

Or a tw*t with a serious QPR problem.

You don't know that he has driven whilst drunk.

[Royal Rother]

Does Kitson's sponsored car have his name splashed across it?

Anyone know?

[zac naloen]

All we do know is that he refused to take the breathe test.

We all know Dave Kitson is a proud man (ultimately his downfall?) who is going to argue his corner if someone accuses him of something he didn't do.

Whether he did do it or not refusing to cooperate is asking for trouble and he got it.

[Uke]

Does Kitson's sponsored car have his name splashed across it?

Anyone know?

Yup, More painted rather than splashed in some sort of drunken fashion...