by readingbedding » 22 Sep 2009 18:41
by cmonurz » 22 Sep 2009 18:59
by Royal Lady » 22 Sep 2009 21:28
RoyaleeRoyal Lady I suggest he plays 1-9 for the watford game - get everyone behind the ball and little Noel Hunt up front, just in case.
I suggest you go away and learn the basics of football before ever posting on here again.
by Terminal Boardom » 22 Sep 2009 21:32
Royal LadyRoyaleeRoyal Lady I suggest he plays 1-9 for the watford game - get everyone behind the ball and little Noel Hunt up front, just in case.
I suggest you go away and learn the basics of football before ever posting on here again.
Even Mr Very Stupid of Stupidsville would have realised I was joking there Lee.
by Pseud O'Nym » 22 Sep 2009 21:44
cmonurz I would not sell Andre Bikey or Kevin Doyle
by loyalroyal4life » 22 Sep 2009 22:26
by rg6royal » 22 Sep 2009 22:36
by Maguire » 23 Sep 2009 10:06
rg6royal First of all I wouldn't have loaned Rosenier out to Ipswich, as the decision to do that was utterly ridiculous! Secondly I'd recall ( if possible ) Bignall from his loan spell at Stockport and give him a go. Could work well with the likes of Nhunt as Bignall has bags of pace and Nhunt can provide the flick ons.
by TBM » 23 Sep 2009 10:09
by Wycombe Royal » 23 Sep 2009 10:09
TBM I would have kept Lita - at least he can score goals.
by CMRoyal » 23 Sep 2009 10:10
rg6royal First of all I wouldn't have loaned Rosenier out to Ipswich, as the decision to do that was utterly ridiculous! Secondly I'd recall ( if possible ) Bignall from his loan spell at Stockport and give him a go. Could work well with the likes of Nhunt as Bignall has bags of pace and Nhunt can provide the flick ons.
by Maguire » 23 Sep 2009 10:14
Wycombe RoyalTBM I would have kept Lita - at least he can score goals.
He didn't want to stay, so how would you have kept him?
by Wycombe Royal » 23 Sep 2009 10:27
MaguireWycombe RoyalTBM I would have kept Lita - at least he can score goals.
He didn't want to stay, so how would you have kept him?
A return to slavery.
by rhroyal » 23 Sep 2009 10:28
MaguireWycombe RoyalTBM I would have kept Lita - at least he can score goals.
He didn't want to stay, so how would you have kept him?
A return to slavery.
by Schards#2 » 23 Sep 2009 10:45
CMRoyalrg6royal First of all I wouldn't have loaned Rosenier out to Ipswich, as the decision to do that was utterly ridiculous! Secondly I'd recall ( if possible ) Bignall from his loan spell at Stockport and give him a go. Could work well with the likes of Nhunt as Bignall has bags of pace and Nhunt can provide the flick ons.
In some ways - and with all due respect - this illustrates the problem we've got into. All last season we heard from certain corners "give Henry a go", "what about Church", "Pearce is the answer", even "why did we let Cox go?". Now what do we think of all these players? We cried out for them, but either it's too early or they're not good enough at the moment. So why on earth would you expect Bignall to be any different?
by Hoop Blah » 23 Sep 2009 12:52
Schards#2ZacNaloen I'm still not sure where you intend this argument to go.
We can't play a conventional 4-4-2 with the available players. Or do you contend that?
I'd rather the manager fannys about with "pretty" formations until he finds one that works rather than soldiering on with a formation that definitely won't work.
I don't want it to go anywhere with you. I've absolutely no interest in your thoughts on this or any other subject.
As for Royalee, it would be nice for him to acknowledge that his comment to RL was a cheap shot and total garbage, but that's about as likely as rocking horse shit as he's not one for acknowledging he's got something wrog - despite, or may because of the fact that he gets pretty much everything wrong.
by runrunrunrungilksey » 23 Sep 2009 13:34
by TBM » 23 Sep 2009 15:00
MaguireWycombe RoyalTBM I would have kept Lita - at least he can score goals.
He didn't want to stay, so how would you have kept him?
A return to slavery.
by Schards#2 » 23 Sep 2009 15:14
Hoop BlahSchards#2ZacNaloen I'm still not sure where you intend this argument to go.
We can't play a conventional 4-4-2 with the available players. Or do you contend that?
I'd rather the manager fannys about with "pretty" formations until he finds one that works rather than soldiering on with a formation that definitely won't work.
I don't want it to go anywhere with you. I've absolutely no interest in your thoughts on this or any other subject.
As for Royalee, it would be nice for him to acknowledge that his comment to RL was a cheap shot and total garbage, but that's about as likely as rocking horse shit as he's not one for acknowledging he's got something wrog - despite, or may because of the fact that he gets pretty much everything wrong.
This just cracks me up!
And the bit about not wanting to go anywhere with Zac, isn't that just like Royalee supposedly avoiding your direct yes no question with a bit more justification for what he said.
"Mr Kettle, you're pretty black aren't you son!" said Mr Pot....
by SteveRoyal » 23 Sep 2009 15:54
Schards#2 Eh?
I don't want to get involved in a debate with Zac because I think he's a cock, nothing to do with discussion at all.
Users browsing this forum: Horsham Royal, Joel, windermereROYAL and 256 guests