by Royal With Cheese » 28 Jan 2010 12:12
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2010 12:15
Royal With Cheese I love the Smith debate. In the end he chose Pompey not Reading/Rodgers. If he truly believed in the "World Class Model" and "European Football" he would be here now.
by Hoop Blah » 28 Jan 2010 12:17
Royal With Cheese I love the Smith debate. In the end he chose Pompey not Reading/Rodgers. If he truly believed in the "World Class Model" and "European Football" he would be here now.
by Royal With Cheese » 28 Jan 2010 12:19
Dirk GentlyRoyal With Cheese I love the Smith debate. In the end he chose Pompey not Reading/Rodgers. If he truly believed in the "World Class Model" and "European Football" he would be here now.
Like 99% of people in the world would, he chose a pay packet at least doble the size of what we were offering.
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2010 12:23
Royal With CheeseDirk GentlyRoyal With Cheese I love the Smith debate. In the end he chose Pompey not Reading/Rodgers. If he truly believed in the "World Class Model" and "European Football" he would be here now.
Like 99% of people in the world would, he chose a pay packet at least doble the size of what we were offering.
At least we're actually paying our players!
Look - that's pure conjecture. Pompey are no bigger than Reading (in some ways way worse off) We have no idea what Smith's proposed wages were. Saying that, I don't blame the lad for joinging them at that Juncture.
by Duke the Dog » 28 Jan 2010 13:14
by Only one Trevor Morley » 28 Jan 2010 13:24
rhroyalgazzer, loyal royal I heard some interesting stuff about Rodgers last night from my source- but unfortunately he asked me not say anything until the end of the season.
What I can say though is Rodgers is a Liar
What's the point behind this post then?
by floyd__streete » 28 Jan 2010 13:56
Sir Rodger Doyle I don't see that it makes any difference at all that Rodgers said he wanted the player, when the player himself had decided he was going to Reading.
Sir Rodger Doyle I could understand the fact that results may not be good to start with. I could accept that, so long as I could see development within the club (and I could).
Sir Rodger Doyle Well done everyone, you have got what you wanted. You have all bought the crap that has been spouted by the club about Rodgers and the current position.
Give yourselves a big gold star. (or a watch if you prefer)
by Maguire » 28 Jan 2010 13:56
Only one Trevor Morley care to at least indicate the general topic that BR was thought to be lieing about?
by brendywendy » 28 Jan 2010 13:58
Pompey are no bigger than Reading
by floyd__streete » 28 Jan 2010 13:58
Maguire So, you headhunt a young manager with strong links to the club, then sack him before he's even played every team in the division, when we're not even in the bottom three, and when you don't have anybody lined up to replace him.
Insanity.
by Hoop Blah » 28 Jan 2010 15:05
floyd__streete List me these developments.
floyd__streete Brendan Rodgers Methodology - that methodology which has scarcely produced any home-grown players for Chelsea during his time as youth coach there. I am fascinated as to what positive spin you are trying to put on Rodgers insisting that players with limited ability like Cisse should adapt to his complex system.
by Royal With Cheese » 28 Jan 2010 15:32
brendywendyPompey are no bigger than Reading
.............oh cmon!
by brendywendy » 28 Jan 2010 15:34
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2010 15:36
Royal With CheesebrendywendyPompey are no bigger than Reading
.............oh cmon!
Only in history are they a "bigger" club. We're averaging similar sort of crowd sizes. They're not paying their players, getting SKY cash and their webiste is currently down (as they haven't paid their bills) so the only way you can buy tickets is by phoning up or calling at the club directly.
by Royal With Cheese » 28 Jan 2010 15:45
brendywendy theyre in the prem now, and have been for years, we were just passing tourists
yes they are a shamblLOLes
but thats different to being bigger/smaller than reading
who are currently aslo slightly shambolic
by Royal With Cheese » 28 Jan 2010 15:48
Dirk Gently That's the situation today - what was the situation in the last week in August, which is the only tme that's relevant to this discussion?
As far as the PL was concerned then, they were solvant enough for there not to be a transfer embargo, and they were (at that time) due to be receiving over £30M of TV income from the PL. Their revenue this season was going to be at least 5 or 6 times ours.....
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2010 15:55
Royal With CheeseDirk Gently That's the situation today - what was the situation in the last week in August, which is the only tme that's relevant to this discussion?
As far as the PL was concerned then, they were solvant enough for there not to be a transfer embargo, and they were (at that time) due to be receiving over £30M of TV income from the PL. Their revenue this season was going to be at least 5 or 6 times ours.....
OK. You guys have made your point. It would always be difficult to turn down a Prem club but it wouldn't surprise me that he signed on a similar wage structure to what we were offering. Again there is no proof either way.
by Hoop Blah » 28 Jan 2010 15:57
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2010 16:05
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Kev Royal, Royals and Racers and 259 guests