by YorkshireRoyal99 »
06 Oct 2022 10:52
tidus_mi2 YorkshireRoyal99 Stranded
Wasn't this a similar pattern when Gourlay was here. We all knew we had to get rid of Stam but despite defeat after defeat and poor showing after poor showing, we kept him in post for a couple of months longer that he should have been. Be interesting to see if he learns from that or if he's hoping for an upturn in form so will keep in place until the WC break, when we will see quite a cull of underperforming managers.
Not sure if I'd pin that solely on Gourlay, but more the club itself, as Pauno was kept probably 6/7 weeks longer than he should have been (should have gone after the Kidderminster/Fulham defeats for me personally).
Wasn't the rumour that we couldn't actually afford to sack Pauno? In the end it seems he walked or there was some reduction in his termination fee for it to go ahead.
I didn't read into that too much really, there was also a rumour flirting that Pauno tried to resign after the Fulham defeat (I think?) but that was rejected by the board, so ultimately, we don't know. Although I think there is a general consensus that Pauno stayed for longer than he should have, whatever the reason is, we don't know.
However, we've kept 2 underperforming managers (Stam and Pauno) for significantly longer than we probably should have done, so I'd be inclined to think that the board were behind the decisions to keep these managers on for more time, but there's always a possibility that there may be other attributing factors.