Snowball Did you notice he said, "The owner, Anton."
Probably just wanted to make sure no one thought he meant Anton Ferdinand because he has been in the news quite a bit recently
by soggy biscuit » 29 Jan 2012 19:36
Snowball Did you notice he said, "The owner, Anton."
by Man Friday » 29 Jan 2012 19:40
Ian RoyalRoyalBlue
Gave £40M?
As you say 51% for £25M so more to come. Plus the level of fame he got, honours etc. do not come cheap. Have you seen how much it costs to buy airtime on Sky and National TV?
And the value of the hotel? What's more that hotel probably would not have ended up in that location and at that cost but for the deal the council did for the ground it stands on, on the basis that it was going to be used by the football club.
And I think you will find the correct spelling is 'paid'.
Still I'm happy with the fact that we now have new investors, so won't moan too much, albeit that it concerns me that ownership of the hotel is not part of the deal.
Mind you, I guess if the owner(s) of the hotel was ever to cause problems for the football club, a few thousand football supporters could do a great deal to deter customers!
How much interest could he have earned on £40m? How much quicker would he have got his peerage and recognition by putting that money into high profile charities etc?
The ingratitude of some of the cnuts on here astounds me. SJM wasn't justing giving us free money and being 100% altruistic when he saved our arses and handed us the best times the club has ever seeen?
Boo fcuking hoo.
by Ian Royal » 29 Jan 2012 21:48
by Uke » 29 Jan 2012 22:12
Snowball Did you notice he said, "The owner, Anton."
by Royal Rother » 30 Jan 2012 09:43
Man FridayIan RoyalRoyalBlue
Gave £40M?
As you say 51% for £25M so more to come. Plus the level of fame he got, honours etc. do not come cheap. Have you seen how much it costs to buy airtime on Sky and National TV?
And the value of the hotel? What's more that hotel probably would not have ended up in that location and at that cost but for the deal the council did for the ground it stands on, on the basis that it was going to be used by the football club.
And I think you will find the correct spelling is 'paid'.
Still I'm happy with the fact that we now have new investors, so won't moan too much, albeit that it concerns me that ownership of the hotel is not part of the deal.
Mind you, I guess if the owner(s) of the hotel was ever to cause problems for the football club, a few thousand football supporters could do a great deal to deter customers!
How much interest could he have earned on £40m? How much quicker would he have got his peerage and recognition by putting that money into high profile charities etc?
The ingratitude of some of the cnuts on here astounds me. SJM wasn't justing giving us free money and being 100% altruistic when he saved our arses and handed us the best times the club has ever seeen?
Boo fcuking hoo.
I'm unimpressed. Someone has managed to outdo Kes's "RattLOLed" on the poor comeback stakes.
by Red » 30 Jan 2012 10:12
by Dare to Dr£am » 30 Jan 2012 10:14
by Vision » 30 Jan 2012 10:28
As much as he can seem like a complete, self centered c*ck on many occasions, Madejski has been an absolutely phenomenal chairman for them. He really, really has.
by melonhead » 30 Jan 2012 10:39
RoyalBluemelonheadMan Friday ...and Sir John hasn't got anything from his association with Reading Football Club? I would contend that he's got his return many times over.
how has he gothis return many times over?
he gave the club 40 million, he sold half of it for 25........
or are you valuing his "fame" at 25 million quid?
either way, you goty what you payed for, he got what he payed for.
not sure what your problem is
Gave £40M?
As you say 51% for £25M so more to come. Plus the level of fame he got, honours etc. do not come cheap. Have you seen how much it costs to buy airtime on Sky and National TV?
And the value of the hotel? What's more that hotel probably would not have ended up in that location and at that cost but for the deal the council did for the ground it stands on, on the basis that it was going to be used by the football club.
And I think you will find the correct spelling is 'paid'.
Still I'm happy with the fact that we now have new investors, so won't moan too much, albeit that it concerns me that ownership of the hotel is not part of the deal.
Mind you, I guess if the owner(s) of the hotel was ever to cause problems for the football club, a few thousand football supporters could do a great deal to deter customers!
by melonhead » 30 Jan 2012 10:46
royalblue Have you conveniently forgotten all the philanthropic soundbites that he came out with in the early days? The numerous mentions of just how much money it was costing him and how he didn't expect to see it back? Talks of gifts? Or do you just not have a memory?
I bet you still hold to the belief that he really didn't want to have the stadium named after him and argued for some time with the person who did supposedly come up with the idea!
This may have been a symbiotic relationship and may continue to be so. However, to suggest there was never any consideration of personal advancement is, in my mind, just dumb. Incidentally, just for completeness, I believe there were other people expressing interest in the club at the time Madejski came in. Maybe he was by far the best on offer but that doesn't mean only he would have saved the club.
I would suggest that even this latest turn, despite being good for the club, also holds benefits for the chairman. I do thank him for taking this step but I will still not break out into applause on demand next time he does the parade.
by Wimb » 30 Jan 2012 12:12
by Svlad Cjelli » 30 Jan 2012 12:19
by Pepe the Horseman » 30 Jan 2012 12:34
Red
by ZacNaloen » 30 Jan 2012 12:35
by ZacNaloen » 30 Jan 2012 12:35
Pepe the HorsemanRed
they're
by FiNeRaIn » 30 Jan 2012 12:36
by Dare to Dr£am » 30 Jan 2012 12:38
Pepe the HorsemanRed
they're
by Maguire » 30 Jan 2012 12:52
Pepe the HorsemanRed
they're
by M0J0 » 30 Jan 2012 13:09
Pepe the HorsemanRed
they're
by Royal Rother » 30 Jan 2012 13:35
ZacNaloen There's plenty of room for improvement in this club with regards to increasing revenue, worth and assets.
Things that will increase the sale value of the club in order of value
A) Stable Premier League Club
B) 38,000 Seater stadium
C) A Better Class of Academy
even if they don't achieve C you are probably in for a return on your 40 million even if you spend 50 million of his own money getting there, in the playing squad or on the stadium because the club will be worth more than 90 million.
It won't be easy, but I suspect this is his business plan.
The only struggle will be finding someone who wants to spend that sort money, but who knows what the economic situation will be then.
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers, st george, URZZZZZZZZ and 212 guests