by Tilehurst End » 06 Feb 2011 10:46
by Elm Park Old Boy » 06 Feb 2011 12:46
by Handsome Man » 06 Feb 2011 13:29
by Snowball » 06 Feb 2011 13:37
Elm Park Old Boy I know many will disagree, but our lack of pace and creativity was a disappointment. Time for Cummings to be given a run, and urged to overlap. And frankly Howard would have been worth using in that game. At least he wouldn't have just hoofed it upfield for Long to get clattered again, or Church to run away from it.
by Snowball » 06 Feb 2011 14:13
by loyalroyal4life » 06 Feb 2011 14:25
by ZacNaloen » 06 Feb 2011 15:10
by ZacNaloen » 06 Feb 2011 15:15
by Ian Royal » 06 Feb 2011 15:21
ZacNaloen It's something that has worked very well since Harte has played at left back.
We got caught out there because we are so high up the pitch and narrow.
by floyd__streete » 06 Feb 2011 15:26
by Ian Royal » 06 Feb 2011 15:50
floyd__streete Just seen the goal again. Whilst his colleagues get caught square with a through ball, Mills utterly fails to get even remotely close to stopping Routledge. Useless c*nt.
by prostak » 06 Feb 2011 15:55
by sandman » 06 Feb 2011 16:14
floyd__streete Just seen the goal again. Whilst his colleagues get caught square with a through ball, Mills utterly fails to get even remotely close to stopping Routledge. Useless c*nt.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 06 Feb 2011 16:16
by Royal Lady » 06 Feb 2011 16:43
by LoyalRoyalFan » 06 Feb 2011 17:00
Royal Lady Well that's not strictly true is it?
by MmmMonsterMunch » 06 Feb 2011 17:16
by Snowball » 06 Feb 2011 17:23
LoyalRoyalFanRoyal Lady Well that's not strictly true is it?
Most of our bad performances and poor goals conceded have originated from Ian Harte.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 06 Feb 2011 17:31
by Snowball » 06 Feb 2011 17:33
LoyalRoyalFan Ian Harte hasn't put in a decent performance all season.
Users browsing this forum: Vision and 850 guests