by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 13 Aug 2009 10:42
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 13 Aug 2009 10:55
by LoyalRoyalFan » 13 Aug 2009 11:01
by Terminal Boardom » 13 Aug 2009 11:13
LoyalRoyalFan
Bikey has the strength, but he also has a calmness about him. I can understand, that as a defender calmness is not always the best thing, but he had the control of the ball and didn't get rid of it at the first attempt.
by wolsey » 13 Aug 2009 11:17
Tommy Youlden's Ears I'll miss him. Love his strength, pace and (some of) his attitude. As many have stated, he has the class to transcend this division, and play at a much higher level than bottom rung prem. But the Burnley (and Afrika Cup o Nations) incidents do mean, I suspect, that £2.5m in the hand trumps his 'potential'. I had a boss who'd say 'we can't change people's personalities'. I'd say this applies to Bikey. The arrogance that makes his play special, is the characteristic that makes him unlikely to listen to the advice he needs to take.
by Thaumagurist* » 13 Aug 2009 12:26
Terminal BoardomLoyalRoyalFan
Bikey has the strength, but he also has a calmness about him. I can understand, that as a defender calmness is not always the best thing, but he had the control of the ball and didn't get rid of it at the first attempt.
Do you have an agent LRF? With gems like this you should be on the stage. I haven't laughed so much since my Nan got her tits caught in the mangle!
by John Peel » 13 Aug 2009 13:59
by FiNeRaIn » 13 Aug 2009 14:39
John Peel I've never known a time like this at the club. It's all great business, as over the past year (inc Kits) we have sold about five core players for a shed load of money. But it's also sad as we're turning into a selling club. Some players I've been happy to get rid of, whereas others, like Bikey or Marek, we should be doing our utmost to keep.
At least we won't be going out of business I guess. We won't be going places either though. Maybe that's where our future lies until some billionaire oil tycoon comes in and turns us into the Super Reading Tigers or something s*it like that.
Oh and £2.8m for a proven player (whatever you think) is a joke. He's played in the Champions League for fcuk sake. Claude Davies to Shef Utd for £3.5m anyone?
by Royalee » 13 Aug 2009 14:43
by W&E Royal » 13 Aug 2009 14:47
by Alan Partridge » 13 Aug 2009 14:50
FiNeRaInJohn Peel I've never known a time like this at the club. It's all great business, as over the past year (inc Kits) we have sold about five core players for a shed load of money. But it's also sad as we're turning into a selling club. Some players I've been happy to get rid of, whereas others, like Bikey or Marek, we should be doing our utmost to keep.
At least we won't be going out of business I guess. We won't be going places either though. Maybe that's where our future lies until some billionaire oil tycoon comes in and turns us into the Super Reading Tigers or something s*it like that.
Oh and £2.8m for a proven player (whatever you think) is a joke. He's played in the Champions League for fcuk sake. Claude Davies to Shef Utd for £3.5m anyone?
Madejski isn't interested in spending it on the club- he's got various business interests he could use the money for,
by brendywendy » 13 Aug 2009 14:52
Royalee We're selling all the players we don't want (obviously with the exception of Doyle who we were always going to lose anyway) for silly money and bringing in better replacements while using the quality youngsters we already have to build a far better team...where's the problem?
by Royalee » 13 Aug 2009 14:55
by Alan Partridge » 13 Aug 2009 15:01
Royalee Of course Doyle's a loss and was always going to be, but would Hunt, Bikey or Harper hold down a place in Rodgers' team? I don't think so. We're improving the side and that means bringing in players that will improve the starting eleven, not just bringing bodies in like we did previously. There's also no point having the likes of Hunt, Bikey and Harper on big wages when we have back-up just as good in Mills/Cisse, Gunnarsson and Matejovsky and probably on lower wages.
by wolsey » 13 Aug 2009 15:16
by brendywendy » 13 Aug 2009 15:20
Royalee Of course Doyle's a loss and was always going to be, but would Hunt, Bikey or Harper hold down a place in Rodgers' team? I don't think so. We're improving the side and that means bringing in players that will improve the starting eleven, not just bringing bodies in like we did previously. There's also no point having the likes of Hunt, Bikey and Harper on big wages when we have back-up just as good in Mills/Cisse, Gunnarsson and Matejovsky and probably on lower wages.
by Alan Partridge » 13 Aug 2009 15:21
wolsey Have the likes of Federici/Hamer/Pearce/Karacan/Davies/Henry/Bignall/HRK/Sigurdsonn not benefitted from the extended loan experiences that they have over the last 2 seasons?
Were they ready to take their place in the team this time last season?
What would have the reaction have been on here if the sales of the likes of Hunt/Doyle/Hahnemann/Lita etc. happened last season and they were replaced by the youngsters that we are pinning our hopes on now?
Hindsight is a wonderful skill (as Royalee could have told you ages ago)
by Mr Angry » 13 Aug 2009 17:35
by LoyalRoyalFan » 13 Aug 2009 17:56
Thaumagurist*Terminal BoardomLoyalRoyalFan
Bikey has the strength, but he also has a calmness about him. I can understand, that as a defender calmness is not always the best thing, but he had the control of the ball and didn't get rid of it at the first attempt.
Do you have an agent LRF? With gems like this you should be on the stage. I haven't laughed so much since my Nan got her tits caught in the mangle!
Are you dense? It's obvious that LRF is referring to his composure on the ball.
by Terminal Boardom » 13 Aug 2009 20:53
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jack Celliers and 242 guests