by tmesis »
05 Mar 2024 16:56
Sutekh Royalwaster Armadillo Roadkill
Be fair. Not many people will realise that the owners of a national league team need to spend a million just to keep their clubs afloat. That is staggering, no matter how familiar you are with the crazy finances of English football.
Thanks - that's the point I was making ... was shocked that even non-league clubs were making these kind of losses with some clubs even still being semi-professional.
Really not surprised given the insane number of clubs that retain professionalism on relegation to non-league let alone the silly number that turn professional while still in the non-league system. Perhaps the leagues should insist that no club below tier 4 be allowed to be professional.
Surprised more clubs aren't going under given the complete insanity of it all, if only we could scrap the PL and start over...
Weirdly, for some clubs it's actually cheaper to be full time rather than part-time.
Part-time players are less likely to move to be near(er) the club, and the club will then have to pay them travel expenses - and those can be higher than the difference in full-time compared to part-time wages.
Non-league clubs do have one advantage, in that contracts are typically much shorter, so they are much less likely to be stuck with bad buys for 3-4 years like we were. The flipside to that is that clubs can face a mass exodus of players if things go wrong.
There's nothing new about clubs overspending. The difference is the sums involved now make it much harder for a local businessman to step in and buy the club when things go wrong. We have rules in place to hit clubs that have grossly overspent and failed. Maybe if we had rules to stop clubs who grossly overspend and succeed, we'd stop people trying.