by Maneki Neko » 14 May 2016 10:48
by genome » 14 May 2016 10:53
Maneki Neko Stop talking to him like hes a serious poster. Hes dave royal
by Ian Royal » 14 May 2016 13:11
Maneki Neko Stop talking to him like hes a serious poster. Hes worse than dave royal
by Victor Meldrew » 14 May 2016 16:41
Top Flight Of course they won't sack McDermott.
The whole idea of firing him is completely ridiculous.
by Longhorn1970 » 14 May 2016 17:44
Victor MeldrewTop Flight Of course they won't sack McDermott.
The whole idea of firing him is completely ridiculous.
I thought CW's choice of words was interesting in saying "if they make a change" which implies to me that making a change could well be on the agenda.
Your point about ridiculous sackings-do you actually follow professional football or just post on here "I love Brian"?
Managers get sacked-it happens regularly whether fans think it is right or wrong.
It wouldn't surprise me if Brian were to be sacked and it wouldn't surprise me if he got another season but I do question the judgement of a manager who spends significant money on a 34 year-old striker and plays his part in Gunter getting a new 3-year contract.
by sandman » 15 May 2016 09:08
Victor MeldrewTop Flight Of course they won't sack McDermott.
The whole idea of firing him is completely ridiculous.
I thought CW's choice of words was interesting in saying "if they make a change" which implies to me that making a change could well be on the agenda.
Your point about ridiculous sackings-do you actually follow professional football or just post on here "I love Brian"?
Managers get sacked-it happens regularly whether fans think it is right or wrong.
It wouldn't surprise me if Brian were to be sacked and it wouldn't surprise me if he got another season but I do question the judgement of a manager who spends significant money on a 34 year-old striker and plays his part in Gunter getting a new 3-year contract.
by Top Flight » 15 May 2016 10:26
Victor MeldrewTop Flight Of course they won't sack McDermott.
The whole idea of firing him is completely ridiculous.
I thought CW's choice of words was interesting in saying "if they make a change" which implies to me that making a change could well be on the agenda.
Your point about ridiculous sackings-do you actually follow professional football or just post on here "I love Brian"?
Managers get sacked-it happens regularly whether fans think it is right or wrong.
It wouldn't surprise me if Brian were to be sacked and it wouldn't surprise me if he got another season but I do question the judgement of a manager who spends significant money on a 34 year-old striker and plays his part in Gunter getting a new 3-year contract.
by Hoop Blah » 15 May 2016 10:51
Top Flight Some people just want to slam McDermott for nothing really and question every minute detail.
by Top Flight » 15 May 2016 11:07
by Hoop Blah » 15 May 2016 11:14
by sandman » 15 May 2016 12:17
by Ian Royal » 15 May 2016 19:58
sandman The long term options are the likes of Samuel and Rakels, but they need experience to play off and Kermorgant can offer that. It hasn't worked out great for him so far but that can happen to January signings, they can't all have a Jason Roberts style impact.
No one is blindly defending Brian, apart from Dave "Top Flight" Royal who is a troll, just using quite reasonable answers as to why you can't judge him fully yet.
Still at least you have an opinion about something Hoop, makes a change from your usual gathering splinters in your arse.
by SCIAG » 15 May 2016 20:58
Top Flight It was a bit like when Coppell signed Owusu and Les Ferdinand. Those signings weren't the final solution.
by Maneki Neko » 16 May 2016 09:24
Hoop Blah You lambasted the criticism of McDermott's judgement in bringing him in and said there wasn't a lot more he could be done and that he was the best option he had at the time.
I'm just suggesting that that's as much a load of rubbish as some of the criticism McDermott gets from some quarters.
by Maneki Neko » 16 May 2016 09:27
Gary Hooper (more expensive of course) and Sonogo (admittedly another loan player)
by Top Flight » 16 May 2016 09:56
SCIAGTop Flight It was a bit like when Coppell signed Owusu and Les Ferdinand. Those signings weren't the final solution.
Yeah but they weren't exactly good either.
by Top Flight » 16 May 2016 09:59
sandman The long term options are the likes of Samuel and Rakels, but they need experience to play off and Kermorgant can offer that. It hasn't worked out great for him so far but that can happen to January signings, they can't all have a Jason Roberts style impact.
No one is blindly defending Brian, apart from Dave "Top Flight" Royal who is a troll, just using quite reasonable answers as to why you can't judge him fully yet.
Still at least you have an opinion about something Hoop, makes a change from your usual gathering splinters in your arse.
by Hoop Blah » 16 May 2016 10:18
Maneki NekoGary Hooper (more expensive of course) and Sonogo (admittedly another loan player)
hooper was more expensive and sonogo was on loan, which we know was already a problem for us.
Maneki Neko what were the other options, in terms of strikers to bring in, at that price, with that experience/record, willing to come here as a short term stop gap?
genuine question.
by Maneki Neko » 16 May 2016 10:48
Hooper was obviously more expensive yes, but why are you asking about players who are only willing to come in is a cheap stop gap though?
by Hoop Blah » 16 May 2016 10:55
Maneki NekoHooper was obviously more expensive yes, but why are you asking about players who are only willing to come in is a cheap stop gap though?
because that's clearly what he was backed to do.
the issue wasn't bringing in kermorgant, it was losing blackman, Sa, Clarke etc
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests