by muirinho »
17 May 2016 13:41
BR2 Earlier within one of the thousands of "I love Brian" posts from Top Flight he referred to Gunter as a decent Championship full-back.
IIRC we paid something like £2,000,000 to sign a Premier League full-back and most of us seem to feel that we, Spurs and Forest all thought this player was better than he really is.
Time to cut our losses?
My point has been that I felt we should have let him go and not renewed his contract as we have with the other lightweight (not in terms of actual weight
) Kanu and get in a braver defensive full-back plus a proper winger instead of Kanu.
It is the retention of Gunter regardless of whether he now has a reduced wage or if he plays like a star at the Euros that makes me question Brian's judgement and his own standing at the club.
If Dennis actually was bought without his input that leads me to think that he has been a bit of a wimp and won't fight his corner which is not a good thing for his future or that of our club.
The signing of Yann and the extension of Gunter's contract both strike me as poor judgement.
Please Top Flight don't respond to this with another "trust Brian" posting as that is just conjecture for the future whereas the topic of this thread was to ask how impressed we have been with his return.
I think neither of those are poor judgement.
£2mill for a Premier League-quality full-back would actually be a hell of a bargain. Robbie Brady, for instance, cost £7million from relegated Hull, and couldn't help Norwich stay up. He's the kind of player maybe you are talking about - but we can't afford £7million, and he's not even good enough anyway!
Nottingham Forest wanted to keep Gunter back in 2012, as they recognised that he was a decent Championship-quality full-back (who might or might not step up to Premier League quality). They held out for more than they paid Spurs for him. If an offer of £2mill came in for him, perhaps we might sell him, but you'd have to imagine it would cost that to get anybody in to replace him, unless they were a free transfer. So you'd be relying on getting a free transfer, and something of an unknown quantity in, to replace somebody you've already got, and know exactly what they can do. Why take that risk? And if you didn't renew, you'd get nothing at all for him, and still have to replace him. That one was an absolute no-brainer, I have no idea why anybody would question it. Sure, get another full-back in, - and if the replacement turns out better than Gunter is, than sell him next summer. But letting him go on a free now, when he wanted to stay, and in a position where we had no backup? Now that would be poor judgement.
Yann cost very little in transfer fees, was excellent in the Championship the season before, and there was no reason why he couldn't do that again. With a decent run of games, you can see the partnership with Rakels working pretty well. Who do you think we could have got, for that kind of money, in January, that would have been better?
To be honest, I'm mystified as to why you think those decisions were poor. Playing McCleary at right back and Gunter at left - could definitely see that being a bone of contention. But those contract decisions were absolutely fine.