by winchester_royal » 16 Oct 2010 19:25
by howser » 16 Oct 2010 19:26
by Royalee » 16 Oct 2010 19:29
by PEARCEY » 16 Oct 2010 19:30
Ideal howser, I'm sure he's trying to do the best he can with what he has available.
by Sarah Star » 16 Oct 2010 19:34
by RoyalBlue » 16 Oct 2010 19:34
Schards#2RoyaleeSchards#2 Business as usual for Rodgers - Reading home defeat.
Whatever he does subsequently won't stop him being one of if not the worst Reading manager in history.
Whatever you say Schards, keep telling yourself McDermott's the bald Mourinho as yet another Matt Mills hoof bounces off of long to their centre back.
I simple comparison of the two's records at Reading is all the is needed.
by Royalee » 16 Oct 2010 19:37
Ideal @Royalee:
I'm sure if we had a better striker, we would play him..
It does not seem we have very good strikers to replace him. Do you disagree?
by howser » 16 Oct 2010 19:38
by andrew1957 » 16 Oct 2010 19:45
by FiNeRaIn » 16 Oct 2010 19:59
by loyalroyal4life » 16 Oct 2010 20:02
by Ginger Ninjas » 16 Oct 2010 20:06
loyalroyal4life Fair play to Swansea and moreso Brenda!
Sound away performance, did exactly what they set out to do hit us on the break with the pace they have.
Sinclair looked quality and it would have been niced if Brenda signed him whilst he was at Reading![]()
That was meant to be our strongest back 4 today, first time they have come together and tbh it is quite evident that they will be caught out for their lack of pace.
Armstrong does not fit in well in the centre, i would hope tabb will be back in soon as i would go with him and then 2 upfront.
Time for Mcderm to realise he does NOT have a replacement for Sig to play in the hole and if he is not getting any financial backing to find an adequate replacement, then must look to play 4-4-2
Thought Kish had a sound game out of a less than average team performance.
by loyalroyal4life » 16 Oct 2010 20:32
Ginger Ninjasloyalroyal4life Fair play to Swansea and moreso Brenda!
Sound away performance, did exactly what they set out to do hit us on the break with the pace they have.
Sinclair looked quality and it would have been niced if Brenda signed him whilst he was at Reading![]()
That was meant to be our strongest back 4 today, first time they have come together and tbh it is quite evident that they will be caught out for their lack of pace.
Armstrong does not fit in well in the centre, i would hope tabb will be back in soon as i would go with him and then 2 upfront.
Time for Mcderm to realise he does NOT have a replacement for Sig to play in the hole and if he is not getting any financial backing to find an adequate replacement, then must look to play 4-4-2
Thought Kish had a sound game out of a less than average team performance.
Agree with pretty much all of that. Don't have a good enough attacking midfielder to replace Sig (although tbf that's a big ask), so 442 seems like the option - hopefully with two hard-working but average strikers up top we can muster a goal!
by Millsy » 16 Oct 2010 20:38
RoyalBlue Despite the BBC claiming 3 attempts on target, I can only remember one genuine such attempt - Jobi's freekick in the first half!![]()
That is completely unacceptable for a home game, as is the tactic of playing poor old Long up front on his own, hoofing the ball forward to him and then not having anyone in position to take advantage of him winning the ball in the air.
If Ego Madejski and his poodle still genuinely believe we do not need a striker, then the lunatics clearly have taken over the Mad House!
As McDermott commented after the game, Rodgers 'spent money on Scott Sinclair who looks a very good player'. Well Brian it's time you started pointing out things like that to your tight-fisted chairman who is still squatting on the very considerable ill-gotten gains from encouraging The Sig to move on.
On final thought: Shorey to Harte - such is the 'progress' under the brilliant financial management of Madjeski and co!
by No Hoops » 16 Oct 2010 20:48
by Snowball » 16 Oct 2010 21:14
by Ian Royal » 16 Oct 2010 21:20
by Ian Royal » 16 Oct 2010 21:31
by Man Friday » 16 Oct 2010 21:37
by Mr Angry » 16 Oct 2010 21:46
Users browsing this forum: Jinx and 214 guests