by UpNorth » 08 Jan 2011 15:55
by Arnie_Pie » 08 Jan 2011 15:58
by Stranded » 08 Jan 2011 16:00
by M-U-R-T-Y » 08 Jan 2011 16:00
by andrew1957 » 08 Jan 2011 16:01
by UpNorth » 08 Jan 2011 16:03
by M-U-R-T-Y » 08 Jan 2011 16:05
UpNorth Presumably we are prepared tp pay more than the £500k that Plymouth turned down from Blackpool recently. Plymouth have an outstanding tax bill of £1m so they need to find some cash soon.
by UpNorth » 08 Jan 2011 16:13
by Stranded » 08 Jan 2011 16:15
andrew1957 LOL if this is true.
Not saying he is a bad player but we need a big 6 foot plus striker like Austin not another midget striker no different to what we have already.
But probably true as he will be a cheap option. LOL ambitious club.
by andrew1957 » 08 Jan 2011 16:31
Strandedandrew1957 LOL if this is true.
Not saying he is a bad player but we need a big 6 foot plus striker like Austin not another midget striker no different to what we have already.
But probably true as he will be a cheap option. LOL ambitious club.
The cheap option would be to not sign anyone, we certainly wouldn't spend £500k if the manager didn't think he offers us a different option would we?
by PistolPete » 08 Jan 2011 16:33
by paultheroyal » 08 Jan 2011 16:35
by Norfolk Royal » 08 Jan 2011 16:46
by Stranded » 08 Jan 2011 16:50
andrew1957Strandedandrew1957 LOL if this is true.
Not saying he is a bad player but we need a big 6 foot plus striker like Austin not another midget striker no different to what we have already.
But probably true as he will be a cheap option. LOL ambitious club.
The cheap option would be to not sign anyone, we certainly wouldn't spend £500k if the manager didn't think he offers us a different option would we?
I think they know how p**ed off many of the fans are so probably feel they have to buy someone to appease the fans - but whereas Austin has a genuine chance of being a PL player longer term - I don't think there is any chance that W-P will be. This would be a complete waste of money IMO and I would prefer that we bought no one.
by andrew1957 » 08 Jan 2011 16:58
Stranded
Riiiiiight! So we're jsut going to spend money on a random who isn't good enough just to appease some unhappy fans - makes perfect sense that.
So at one moment you're pissed off we're not spending money or signing someone and then when it looks like the top scorer of League 1 could be on his way then there's obviously some nefarious reason behind it and he's not good enough anyway. He has scored goals at this level too, and in the Premier League - would be a snip at £500k.
by Stranded » 08 Jan 2011 17:05
andrew1957Stranded
Riiiiiight! So we're jsut going to spend money on a random who isn't good enough just to appease some unhappy fans - makes perfect sense that.
So at one moment you're pissed off we're not spending money or signing someone and then when it looks like the top scorer of League 1 could be on his way then there's obviously some nefarious reason behind it and he's not good enough anyway. He has scored goals at this level too, and in the Premier League - would be a snip at £500k.
Believe what you like. The rumours on the Plymouth fansite is 300k and yes if the club can get away with wasting 300k rather than investing 1.5m for Austin then i think they would. If we cannot have the type of player we obvious need I would rather the money was kept in the Chairman's pocket.
by PistolPete » 08 Jan 2011 17:07
Norfolk Royal Tbf both cases were dropped against him, he might have grown up now, give him a chance.
by Norfolk Royal » 08 Jan 2011 17:16
by PistolPete » 08 Jan 2011 17:18
by andrew1957 » 08 Jan 2011 17:22
brendywendyBig Footbrendywendy can we have his dad
Better than Shane Long
statin the bleedin obvious!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], John Madejski's Wallet and 174 guests