Extended-Phenotype A big NO to Harte being an understudy.
Depends on who else we might get in at LB, surely?
by Platypuss » 27 Apr 2012 12:53
Extended-Phenotype A big NO to Harte being an understudy.
by marcusopp » 27 Apr 2012 14:05
by RobRoyal » 27 Apr 2012 14:33
marcusopp He was in the division team of the season for crying out loud!
Surely that means he's good enough for the premier league.
by robbieroyal » 27 Apr 2012 17:24
by SCIAG » 27 Apr 2012 21:40
RobRoyalmarcusopp He was in the division team of the season for crying out loud!
Surely that means he's good enough for the premier league.
Erm... no.
He might be, but being picked in the division team of the year has nothing to do with it.
by AthleticoSpizz » 27 Apr 2012 22:01
by leon » 27 Apr 2012 22:38
AthleticoSpizz Oh....good grief....
.......and our recent upsurge and his PFA vote , has obviously coincided with him being one of our first team starters........and therefore noticed by the peers that have failed to deal with him....and have rightly voted for him
Start him in the Prem...he can do a Delap, but with shoes on his hands
by AthleticoSpizz » 27 Apr 2012 22:40
by Royal Rumbler » 27 Apr 2012 22:43
by leon » 27 Apr 2012 23:05
AthleticoSpizz agree, but who cares
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Apr 2012 05:45
by Simon's Church » 28 Apr 2012 13:03
Snowball After the penalty today Harte has scored 5 goals this season, must be first choice next year.
by CayeneMatt » 28 Apr 2012 16:08
loyalroyal4life hope this means we get rid of mills, cut the wage bill and get rid of him! Quite clear we will be signing a better LB to slot in with harte as cover
by Friday's Legacy » 28 Apr 2012 16:12
by SCIAG » 28 Apr 2012 16:35
Friday's Legacy Mills always looked nervous on the ball and would then give the ball away with a hopeless long ball.
by marcusopp » 28 Apr 2012 16:59
SCIAGFriday's Legacy Mills always looked nervous on the ball and would then give the ball away with a hopeless long ball.
When he first came into the team, yes, but then he gained in confidence immensely, was overlapping well, putting good balls into the box, and he was more than adequate defensively. As usual though, he got injured and McDermott preferred experience to promise.
by RoyalJames101 » 28 Apr 2012 18:55
by AthleticoSpizz » 28 Apr 2012 18:59
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 28 Apr 2012 19:06
Athlecticospizz wrote: the penalty that should've been retaken....top geezer
by PieEater » 28 Apr 2012 19:19
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Jinx, Orion1871, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 317 guests