Team for Sunderland

CavershamRoyal
Member
Posts: 460
Joined: 26 May 2011 16:59

Re: Team for Sunderland

by CavershamRoyal » 23 Aug 2012 20:53

Feds

Gunter - Gorkss - Pearce - Shorey

McCleary - Guthrie - Lwood - McAnuff

Pog - Roberts

Bench: McCarthy, Mariappa, Harte, Karacan, HRK/Kebe, ALF, Hunt

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Team for Sunderland

by Ian Royal » 23 Aug 2012 21:13

Hampshire Royal I wasn't there last night, and only saw the highlights on Sky. Was it really 'long ball' cos Pog's goal didn't look like that. Guthrie's goal (assisted by Cech) was from a free kick. Maybe I missed all the long balls, as apparently did the Sky reviewer and all the pundits who watched the game who said that for long periods we outplayed Chelsea at their own game.

When we were playing particularly well (last 25 minutes of the first half, last 10 minutes of second half) we were playing neat but direct football with plenty of shorter passes mixed in like we always do at our best. When Chelsea were dominating we hoofed the ball clear to nowhere in a mildly desperate attempt to relieve pressure.

At least that's what I saw from the stream.

User avatar
Stuboo
Member
Posts: 876
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 09:25

Re: Team for Sunderland

by Stuboo » 24 Aug 2012 01:45

Ian Royal
Hampshire Royal I wasn't there last night, and only saw the highlights on Sky. Was it really 'long ball' cos Pog's goal didn't look like that. Guthrie's goal (assisted by Cech) was from a free kick. Maybe I missed all the long balls, as apparently did the Sky reviewer and all the pundits who watched the game who said that for long periods we outplayed Chelsea at their own game.

When we were playing particularly well (last 25 minutes of the first half, last 10 minutes of second half) we were playing neat but direct football with plenty of shorter passes mixed in like we always do at our best. When Chelsea were dominating we hoofed the ball clear to nowhere in a mildly desperate attempt to relieve pressure.

At least that's what I saw from the stream.


I'd agree with Ian and add that I percieved that we played more short passes against Chelsea than usual, which was good.

shaka's shorts
Member
Posts: 580
Joined: 04 May 2005 13:58
Location: Wokingham

Re: Team for Sunderland

by shaka's shorts » 24 Aug 2012 09:06

Shorey playing for u21s tonight, so it looks like the team will be largely unchanged sat

User avatar
RoyalWire
Member
Posts: 115
Joined: 14 May 2012 11:57

Re: Team for Sunderland

by RoyalWire » 24 Aug 2012 10:33

I would line up exactly the same as we did at Stamford Bridge.

I think at times we caused Chelsea massive problems, one's that Sunderland might struggle with. I haven't seen Roberts play so chuck him on the bench ha-ha!


User avatar
MouldyRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1830
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 16:19
Location: 54-46 that's my number

Re: Team for Sunderland

by MouldyRoyal » 24 Aug 2012 10:35

He's a bit like the Pog, slightly less mobile but with better ball control and perhaps bullies defenders even more. Likes balls to the feet though.

Good player.

I genuinely think they would work well together in a 4-4-2.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Team for Sunderland

by winchester_royal » 24 Aug 2012 10:36

robbieroyal I thought Gunter was terrible last night.


LOL

moron

Cypry
Member
Posts: 995
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 13:32

Re: Team for Sunderland

by Cypry » 24 Aug 2012 10:36

Guess it largely depends on Roberts fitness (or lack of it) and whether anyone has picked up a knock/struggled to recover from the Chelsea game.
I suspect we'll be unchanged if possible, with Roberts on the bench if he's fit....perhaps Cummings/Mariappa making way for Roberts...?

User avatar
RoyalWire
Member
Posts: 115
Joined: 14 May 2012 11:57

Re: Team for Sunderland

by RoyalWire » 24 Aug 2012 10:40

MouldyRoyal He's a bit like the Pog, slightly less mobile but with better ball control and perhaps bullies defenders even more. Likes balls to the feet though.

Good player.

I genuinely think they would work well together in a 4-4-2.


Cheers for that.

Sounds like the would have done well against Stoke's big lads at the back!

Gutted I wont be able to watch this one online and will have to settle for the garbage MOTD highlights :(


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Team for Sunderland

by Ian Royal » 24 Aug 2012 12:15

winchester_royal
robbieroyal I thought Gunter was terrible last night.


LOL

moron


you criticised me for doing similar to this? :wink:

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Team for Sunderland

by winchester_royal » 24 Aug 2012 13:10

Ian Royal
winchester_royal
robbieroyal I thought Gunter was terrible last night.


LOL

moron


you criticised me for doing similar to this? :wink:


I'm nothing if not a hypocrite :P

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11966
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: Team for Sunderland

by bcubed » 24 Aug 2012 13:39

No change, I hope
If we go to 4 in midfield, which I guess we will do at home, we wil get seriously overrun
Wednesday night we looked very organised- I wouldn't change anyone except bring Roberts on the bench

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Team for Sunderland

by Extended-Phenotype » 24 Aug 2012 14:02

Would consider putting McCarthy in for Feds. Let him get over his crisis off-pitch.

Love us to stick Roberts and Pog up top with a 4-4-2, but sneaky suspicion the 4-5-1 is our ‘away’ formation; no beef with that – worked great on Tuesday so bring it on.


Royals-lad14
Member
Posts: 645
Joined: 05 Feb 2010 21:07

Re: Team for Sunderland

by Royals-lad14 » 24 Aug 2012 14:08

-----------------------Feds---------------------------------

---Gunter--------Pearce-----Gorkss--------Harte------
--- McCleary---- Guthrie----Ledge------McAnuff-----
----------------------------Alf----------------------------
----------------------------Pog---------------------------

subs: McCarthy, Cummings, Marriappa, Karacan, HRK, Roberts, Hunt

would rest Jem as he has only just come back from long term injury, alf can almost become the 5th midfielder at times with his work rate so put him just behind pog.

User avatar
robbieroyal
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: 05 Jul 2011 18:43
Location: Worthing

Re: Team for Sunderland

by robbieroyal » 24 Aug 2012 14:46

winchester_royal
robbieroyal I thought Gunter was terrible last night.


LOL

moron



Ok WR, Judging on the teams performance, Gunter was a couple of marks under the rest of them. Give him that surely?

There is no way you can deny that he has struggled for us in these two games so far??

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Team for Sunderland

by winchester_royal » 24 Aug 2012 14:51

robbieroyal
winchester_royal
robbieroyal I thought Gunter was terrible last night.


LOL

moron



Ok WR, Judging on the teams performance, Gunter was a couple of marks under the rest of them. Give him that surely?

There is no way you can deny that he has struggled for us in these two games so far??


There absolutely is.

Etherington hardly had a sniff all game against him last Saturday.

Was up against Hazard on Wednesday and apart from the penalty certainly didn't disgrace himself.

Apart from a couple of misplaced passes he's looked pretty comfortable on the ball, and was finding Pog's feet with regularity on Wednesday (something the other guys at the back have failed to do).

I like Cummings, but Gunter is a class above.

moonwalklikebas
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 30 Aug 2011 22:00

Re: Team for Sunderland

by moonwalklikebas » 24 Aug 2012 14:58

Seems to be an overwhelming cry for Shorey on here.

I would play Harte purely based on that he may want some revenge on the club that didnt really give him a chance.
His legs might be tiring with 3 games in a week:

Feds
Gunter
Pearce
Gorkss
Harte

HRK
Guthrie
Ledge
G-MAC


POG
ALF

moonwalklikebas
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 30 Aug 2011 22:00

Re: Team for Sunderland

by moonwalklikebas » 24 Aug 2012 14:59

And by that ^ I do mean dropping the un-droppable Jobi Mcanuff! Who has been piss poor.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Team for Sunderland

by winchester_royal » 24 Aug 2012 15:02

moonwalklikebas And by that ^ I do mean dropping the un-droppable Jobi Mcanuff! Who has been piss poor.


Oh good, another moron

moonwalklikebas
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 30 Aug 2011 22:00

Re: Team for Sunderland

by moonwalklikebas » 24 Aug 2012 15:07

winchester_royal
moonwalklikebas And by that ^ I do mean dropping the un-droppable Jobi Mcanuff! Who has been piss poor.


Oh good, another moron


Hahah Moron?!?! Good luck!

Mcanuff missed an open goal with a header. Struggled to beat a man in the previous two games (except one little jink at Chelsea) Defends like hes been shot and dragging his body back. Gives little to no cover for the full back (Gunts or Harte) Making their work rate more and leaving them more exposed.



When Hal comes on he attacks the full backs. Gets at them, makes them think. Same for Jimmy and Mclearly.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Crusader Royal, Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers, Vision, WestYorksRoyal and 289 guests

It is currently 23 Nov 2024 17:58