by Royalclapper » 03 Nov 2012 20:40
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2012 20:53
creative_username_1Ian RoyalQuite clearly they didn't perform to the level they could and arguably ought to have done. Just as we outperformed our level, a little.
Perhaps they aren't as good as you think. Why do you think Reading outperformed? Based on what?
by sandman » 03 Nov 2012 21:09
TheSiegeRoyalclapper Spent loads of money that they haven't got.
But will get if they remain in the top division!
by Mid Sussex Royal » 03 Nov 2012 21:17
by ManchesterRoyals » 03 Nov 2012 21:37
Mid Sussex Royal I think if we'd had a few easy early games like they've had it would have made it easier for us - first time round in prem we had Middlesboro, City (nothing special then) at home and Villa, Wigan and Sheff U away.
We got 9 points from those - made it so much easier after that - we had points in the bag when the hard games came - like West Ham have now.
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2012 21:37
by ManchesterRoyals » 03 Nov 2012 21:40
Ian Royal Maybe? MAYBE!?!
by JS28ZoD » 03 Nov 2012 23:58
by leon » 04 Nov 2012 00:31
JS28ZoD They have brought in real quality and prem experience in Carrol, Diame, Jaaskalinen and Jarvis, add to that also a wild card in Maiga with bags of pace. They did also have a squad containing proven prem players like Nolan, Noble, Taylor, O'Neil, Carlton Cole etc so arguably in comparison to us their squad didn't need much of an overhaul, but give big Sam credit he didn't rest on his laurels and added quality to their squad.
The business we did just doesn't get anywhere near to competing with this, as such it is no surprise that the two teams are at opposite ends of the table. We are looking well short of quality to be able to stay in this league.
by Jackson Corner » 04 Nov 2012 00:35
by Flyingkiwi » 04 Nov 2012 00:49
Alexander LitvinenkoManchesterRoyals So what have they done that we havent?
Won 4 Premier League matches. Next question, please......
by Barry the bird boggler » 04 Nov 2012 09:04
Royalclapper Spent loads of money that they haven't got.
by soggy biscuit » 04 Nov 2012 09:25
by melonhead » 04 Nov 2012 13:12
ManchesterRoyals At the time of writing this WH are in 8th place and holding City at home
So what have they done that we havent?
Transfers, Management or what?
by hammer91 » 05 Nov 2012 00:33
by larry1971 » 05 Nov 2012 08:11
TheSiege Dodgy question! West Ham should not even be in the Prem. They have'nt paid the price of their cheating yet! However, given that, they ruthlessly upgraded their squad to the requirements of the division. RFC chose not to! Results speak for themselves!
Fact. RFC released 13 players at the end of the last season (not all first-teamers admittedly) and also sold two later and loaned out most of our up-and-coming U21's Between 3 to 6 first team Prem. players needed to be acquired in the Summer window and they were all considered to be too expensive. Had we bought the right players, at most, we would have got rid of 20 and brought in 13. We tried to be a budget club and everyone except the Ownership knew it would not work! It has not!
I know that some people on this site ignore reality and live on hope and trust in the Management but, surely, even they must now realise that you cannot dodge reality!
by MrWestHam » 05 Nov 2012 09:22
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 05 Nov 2012 09:48
You’ve got a good enough squad to stay up
by Still Hate Futcher! » 05 Nov 2012 09:48
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 05 Nov 2012 10:05
either - Liverpool did. West Ham have merely benefitted from him falling out of favour with 'ol Big Watch.£35 mill England internationals
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests