by bobbybottler » 01 May 2013 18:48
by From Despair To Where? » 01 May 2013 18:56
WHTIDZaretsky What's your take on the cutting of ticket prices to fill the OS having an effect on Leyton Orient's attendance and viability?
I find it absolutely hilarious. The fact that a side that averages what about 2.5k per match, run by some clueless clown, believe they deserve a ground share. Bizarre. I hate everything about them. If our move drives them into the ground and kills the club, I'll be delighted. Tiny club, no history, crap league, crap team, no fans
by Hampshire Royal » 01 May 2013 19:02
by marcusopp » 01 May 2013 19:26
Colin CheeselogWHTID I know it hurts going down
Not really. Most of us will still turn up to watch 11 men in blue and white shirts playing against another 11 men in different coloured shirts. The main differences will be:
- More games
- It will be cheaper
- We're more likely to win
- We're more likely to score
- We can have some better away days
- Less pundits taking rubbish about us
- Less 'blokes down the pub' talking rubbish about us
- Less prima donna players
- Less prima donna opposition
- Less big club favouritism from refs
- More chance of young players who come from Reading getting a game
The only downside appear to be:
- Less money for the club, but that doesn't really affect me personally anyway
- Lower profile for the club. Again doesn't bother me, i like being different and supporting little old Reading
by WHTID » 01 May 2013 22:15
bobbybottler I'm OK with Orient.
It's Billy Big Bollocks WHU fans who think they're better than Orient that make me puke.
by WHTID » 01 May 2013 22:19
From Despair To Where?WHTIDZaretsky What's your take on the cutting of ticket prices to fill the OS having an effect on Leyton Orient's attendance and viability?
I find it absolutely hilarious. The fact that a side that averages what about 2.5k per match, run by some clueless clown, believe they deserve a ground share. Bizarre. I hate everything about them. If our move drives them into the ground and kills the club, I'll be delighted. Tiny club, no history, crap league, crap team, no fans
Thing is, it's comments like that that make you look like a head up your arse Billy Big Bollox, like the majority of WHU fans we get on here.
We may be a light years from where we were 20 years ago but we don't forget where we have come from and remarks belittling smaller clubs don't go down too well.
... a bit rich calling Hearn a oxf*rd when WHU employ Brooking and are owned by a pair of dildo salesmen.
by WHTID » 01 May 2013 22:23
Hampshire Royal A friend of mine is an Orient fan and I went with him to a game at Brisbane Road. The standard of football was pretty atrocious, to be honest (they were playing Franchise FC). What I did enjoy was the same atmosphere in the ground that we used to get when I started to watch Reading. The players weren't prima donnas and actually talked to fans before, during and after the game. It was like football was pre-Sky!! If they ever got a groundshare at the OS, all that would go and the club would lose a lot of the 'feeling' it has now.
As for Hearn being a wakner, maybe he is,but at least he didn't make his money from producing porn. What do you think, WHTID, about the theory that Gold and Sullivan only moved into the OS so that W Ham would be a more attractive club to sell to some rich foreign owner?
by From Despair To Where? » 01 May 2013 22:46
WHTID I have absolutely nothing wrong with smaller clubs, such as orient, and have as much respect for them as any other side.
WHTID I hate everything about them. If our move drives them into the ground and kills the club, I'll be delighted
by bobbybottler » 01 May 2013 23:22
WHTID ......honestly, I'm really not a big bollocks west ham fan.
WHTID Fact is, we are better than orient.
by sandman » 01 May 2013 23:29
WHTIDbobbybottler I'm OK with Orient.
It's Billy Big Bollocks WHU fans who think they're better than Orient that make me puke.
That's fair enough bobby, I respect that and that's fine with you liking orient. Although honestly, I'm really not a big bollocks west ham fan. Fact is, we are better than orient. Anyone who says west ham are not better than Leyton Orient needs something checked. It's simu because they're an east London rival. I'm not 100% sure who your rivals are, but I'm sure I maybe feel the same about some of the sides you don't like either. But yeah I have nothing wrong with you liking them
by Rex » 02 May 2013 02:29
genome What's with the influx of West Ham fans? Have they been lurking, wait to strike when we mention them?
by Big Ern » 02 May 2013 04:54
WHTID Also unlucky about relegation.
by Reading4eva » 02 May 2013 07:01
WHTIDbobbybottler I'm OK with Orient.
It's Billy Big Bollocks WHU fans who think they're better than Orient that make me puke.
That's fair enough bobby, I respect that and that's fine with you liking orient. Although honestly, I'm really not a big bollocks west ham fan. Fact is, we are better than orient. Anyone who says west ham are not better than Leyton Orient needs something checked. It's simu because they're an east London rival. I'm not 100% sure who your rivals are, but I'm sure I maybe feel the same about some of the sides you don't like either. But yeah I have nothing wrong with you liking them
by LUX » 02 May 2013 08:08
by Alexander Litvinenko » 02 May 2013 09:36
WHTIDHampshire Royal A friend of mine is an Orient fan and I went with him to a game at Brisbane Road. The standard of football was pretty atrocious, to be honest (they were playing Franchise FC). What I did enjoy was the same atmosphere in the ground that we used to get when I started to watch Reading. The players weren't prima donnas and actually talked to fans before, during and after the game. It was like football was pre-Sky!! If they ever got a groundshare at the OS, all that would go and the club would lose a lot of the 'feeling' it has now.
As for Hearn being a wakner, maybe he is,but at least he didn't make his money from producing porn. What do you think, WHTID, about the theory that Gold and Sullivan only moved into the OS so that W Ham would be a more attractive club to sell to some rich foreign owner?
Honestly I think that's possibly part of their plan. I'm not 100% sure it'll work in all honesty, but yes I do feel once we move, they will try to let us go. The move was one of the main targets they had and now that has been secured, I can see them at some point trying to cash in. Would I like a big foreign owner like city? No. I love being a bit of a yoyo club. I have no doubts either that, despite having supported West Ham all my life, I'd be called plastic by a number of idiots from other sides. We'll just have to see
by Hedley Lamarr » 02 May 2013 11:02
by runtyroyal » 02 May 2013 11:07
Colin CheeselogWHTID I know it hurts going down
Not really. Most of us will still turn up to watch 11 men in blue and white shirts playing against another 11 men in different coloured shirts. The main differences will be:
- More games
- It will be cheaper
- We're more likely to win
- We're more likely to score
- We can have some better away days
- Less pundits taking rubbish about us
- Less 'blokes down the pub' talking rubbish about us
- Less prima donna players
- Less prima donna opposition
- Less big club favouritism from refs
- More chance of young players who come from Reading getting a game
The only downside appear to be:
- Less money for the club, but that doesn't really affect me personally anyway
- Lower profile for the club. Again doesn't bother me, i like being different and supporting little old Reading
by From Despair To Where? » 02 May 2013 13:58
Hedley Lamarr I don't quite see why other hammers have a problem with Orient or their fans as we've never really had much to do with them with regard to fixtures. Hearn is really only contesting West Ham because he has to be seen to be doing something and it's questionable whether our move there will affect Orient at all.
I personally don't think Gold and Sullivan are solely in it for the money but then who would blame them if they were? It's not like other club owners are in it just to give their own fortunes away. G&S have so far halved our debt of £100mil and nobody can really complain about where we are in the league or having a raised profile and status. We could easily have gone the way of Portsmouth.
But i do agree with a lot of you guys in saying that its about not forgetting your past and where you came from. I also agree that like reading, out of the seasons i've been watching West Ham over the last 33 years, the championship seasons have probably been the most enjoyable. And these ticket prices of £49 are out of order. west Ham like many other clubs want their cake and eat it but ultimately it's the rediculous players wage demands that is killing football as thats where all the money goes. Next season there is a bigger tv revenue yet the ticket prices are still going up!
by Vision » 02 May 2013 14:38
Hampshire Royal
As for Hearn being a wakner, maybe he is,but at least he didn't make his money from producing porn. What do you think, WHTID, about the theory that Gold and Sullivan only moved into the OS so that W Ham would be a more attractive club to sell to some rich foreign owner?
by Zaretsky » 02 May 2013 14:53
WHTIDZaretsky What's your take on the cutting of ticket prices to fill the OS having an effect on Leyton Orient's attendance and viability?
I find it absolutely hilarious. The fact that a side that averages what about 2.5k per match, run by some clueless clown, believe they deserve a ground share. Bizarre. I hate everything about them. If our move drives them into the ground and kills the club, I'll be delighted. Tiny club, no history, crap league, crap team, no fans
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers, st george and 134 guests