MmmMonsterMunchsoggy biscuit Had the game finished 30 seconds earlier this mongboard would be in meltdown and fans would have been calling for the manager to go at the final whistle
So true!!
true, but it didn't.
by kwik-silva » 01 Jan 2014 19:55
MmmMonsterMunchsoggy biscuit Had the game finished 30 seconds earlier this mongboard would be in meltdown and fans would have been calling for the manager to go at the final whistle
So true!!
by peterroyal76 » 01 Jan 2014 19:55
SCIAG Pearce was fine whenever he had someone to pass to. He had trouble whenever he didn't have someone to pass to.
by peterroyal76 » 01 Jan 2014 19:56
kwik-silvaMmmMonsterMunchsoggy biscuit Had the game finished 30 seconds earlier this mongboard would be in meltdown and fans would have been calling for the manager to go at the final whistle
So true!!
true, but it didn't.
by urz13 » 01 Jan 2014 19:58
by SPARTA » 01 Jan 2014 19:59
by marlowuk » 01 Jan 2014 20:00
kwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
by bcubed » 01 Jan 2014 20:04
kwik-silva Guthrie needs to take the passes when they're on, and not get himself into trouble whilst simultaneously slowing the game and passing it back to Pearce - who then has no options.
by royalp-we » 01 Jan 2014 20:07
by SHORT AND CURLY » 01 Jan 2014 20:09
marlowukkwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
Nice to see Niall Keown given a run for the final 8 minutes or so. Can't remember him doing anything of note but good to get one of our youngsters involved.
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jan 2014 20:09
marlowukkwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
We played well for the last 10 minutes because Forest let us. For the remainder of the game Forest played the ball around at the back (like we try to do!) but also harried us and didn't give us time on the ball. We always look bad under that sort of pressure. For the first 10-15 minutes of the second half the ball was hardly out of our half and we hardly touched the ball. I really don't understand those who say Forest were oor because then they looked anything but!! However with 10 to go, Forest decided that 1-0 was enough and tried to protect that lead. That was a mistake as it enabled us to get forward at pace and put them under pressure for a change. We got the draw that we really didn't deserve.
Forest missed two gilt-edged chances in the second half and McCarthy was forced into making a few decent saves as well. MOTM was probably Nick Blackman who worked hard, showed some good skill and had a thunderous drive that just missed the goal. He also laid off a peach of a pass deflecting the ball to Cummings to set a dangerous attack.
POG would have been joint MOTM (again!) but was lucky to stay on the pitch after a sliding two footed challenge borne out of frustration.
Gunter did pretty well as a central defender but it meant we lacked height in our box at corners etc.
Pearce had a 'mare! Guthrie did little better although he had a screamer of a shot brilliantly saved by their keeper. I had him down as POTS after about 15 games but he has not had a good game for a while now. He likes to collect the ball, look around, pass it and then move into a position to be available for a return pass if necessary. Unlike most of our players he seems to want the ball which is good. But he likes time on the ball and he hasn't been getting that recently.
Kelly didn't look very solid but he did score our goal! Cummings did OK against a tricky winger.
Both Sharp and Alf were pretty anonymous; McCleary had a few good runs and one good tight-angled shot that just missed the post but wasn't on form today.
Royston added some life when he was brought on and was the only player seemingly capable of crossing the ball effectively (from which we scored)
Williams showed some nice touches but has not, for me, realised the potential he showed early season.
Nice to see Niall Keown given a run for the final 8 minutes or so. Can't remember him doing anything of note but good to get one of our youngsters involved.
by bcubed » 01 Jan 2014 20:12
SPARTA I don't have it in me to summarise another diabolical performance, but will say Blackman was superb today, and the rest were dire. Special mention for Guthrie, who I have always liked and wanted to do well here, but I am starting to agree that he is a problem in midfield. I lost count through utter frustration today how many times he wanted the ball and ignored/didn't see what was on, before passing backwards to the defence, or kept the ball until the moment passed. If he's being told, as Adkins suggested after the Boro game, that he wants the ball played sooner but the players just aren't doing it, I just wonder if Guthrie seems to think he knows better than the manager (again).. or that he's simply over-rated and can't read the game.
Blackman - excellent
Guthrie - frustrating
Pearce - a joke
The rest - awful
by Glory Boy » 01 Jan 2014 20:13
marlowukkwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
We played well for the last 10 minutes because Forest let us. For the remainder of the game Forest played the ball around at the back (like we try to do!) but also harried us and didn't give us time on the ball. We always look bad under that sort of pressure. For the first 10-15 minutes of the second half the ball was hardly out of our half and we hardly touched the ball. I really don't understand those who say Forest were oor because then they looked anything but!! However with 10 to go, Forest decided that 1-0 was enough and tried to protect that lead. That was a mistake as it enabled us to get forward at pace and put them under pressure for a change. We got the draw that we really didn't deserve.
Forest missed two gilt-edged chances in the second half and McCarthy was forced into making a few decent saves as well. MOTM was probably Nick Blackman who worked hard, showed some good skill and had a thunderous drive that just missed the goal. He also laid off a peach of a pass deflecting the ball to Cummings to set a dangerous attack.
.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Jan 2014 20:14
Glory Boymarlowukkwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
We played well for the last 10 minutes because Forest let us. For the remainder of the game Forest played the ball around at the back (like we try to do!) but also harried us and didn't give us time on the ball. We always look bad under that sort of pressure. For the first 10-15 minutes of the second half the ball was hardly out of our half and we hardly touched the ball. I really don't understand those who say Forest were oor because then they looked anything but!! However with 10 to go, Forest decided that 1-0 was enough and tried to protect that lead. That was a mistake as it enabled us to get forward at pace and put them under pressure for a change. We got the draw that we really didn't deserve.
Forest missed two gilt-edged chances in the second half and McCarthy was forced into making a few decent saves as well. MOTM was probably Nick Blackman who worked hard, showed some good skill and had a thunderous drive that just missed the goal. He also laid off a peach of a pass deflecting the ball to Cummings to set a dangerous attack.
.
I thought for 80 minutes Forest were the best side at Mad this season ( Not that it is a great accolade in this mediocre Championship ) . Last 10 minutes they reverted to ultra defensive tactics with reckless passes and hoofballs. I would have taken a point before the game and I think this point taken in the circumstances could be good building block for us to find some form.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:23
peterroyal76soggy biscuit Had the game finished 30 seconds earlier this mongboard would be in meltdown and fans would have been calling for the manager to go at the final whistle
They'll just wait until the next defeat.
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jan 2014 20:23
Glory Boymarlowukkwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
We played well for the last 10 minutes because Forest let us. For the remainder of the game Forest played the ball around at the back (like we try to do!) but also harried us and didn't give us time on the ball. We always look bad under that sort of pressure. For the first 10-15 minutes of the second half the ball was hardly out of our half and we hardly touched the ball. I really don't understand those who say Forest were oor because then they looked anything but!! However with 10 to go, Forest decided that 1-0 was enough and tried to protect that lead. That was a mistake as it enabled us to get forward at pace and put them under pressure for a change. We got the draw that we really didn't deserve.
Forest missed two gilt-edged chances in the second half and McCarthy was forced into making a few decent saves as well. MOTM was probably Nick Blackman who worked hard, showed some good skill and had a thunderous drive that just missed the goal. He also laid off a peach of a pass deflecting the ball to Cummings to set a dangerous attack.
.
I thought for 80 minutes Forest were the best side at Mad this season ( Not that it is a great accolade in this mediocre Championship ) . Last 10 minutes they reverted to ultra defensive tactics with reckless passes and hoofballs. I would have taken a point before the game and I think this point taken in the circumstances could be good building block for us to find some form.
P!ssed Off
And why not?
Shit all season. I think it's for the best if he goes.
Adkins has escaped today by the skin of his teeth.
Can't imagine we'll be too successful in the next two away games.
Home against Bolton: win or you're out Nigel.
by marlowuk » 01 Jan 2014 20:24
RoyalBluemarlowukkwik-silva They need to play like that for more than 10 minutes, but they've shown they can do it and we (somehow) came away with a point. There are positives but they're few and far between - they really were dire for 80 minutes.
We played well for the last 10 minutes because Forest let us. For the remainder of the game Forest played the ball around at the back (like we try to do!) but also harried us and didn't give us time on the ball. We always look bad under that sort of pressure. For the first 10-15 minutes of the second half the ball was hardly out of our half and we hardly touched the ball. I really don't understand those who say Forest were oor because then they looked anything but!! However with 10 to go, Forest decided that 1-0 was enough and tried to protect that lead. That was a mistake as it enabled us to get forward at pace and put them under pressure for a change. We got the draw that we really didn't deserve.
Forest missed two gilt-edged chances in the second half and McCarthy was forced into making a few decent saves as well. MOTM was probably Nick Blackman who worked hard, showed some good skill and had a thunderous drive that just missed the goal. He also laid off a peach of a pass deflecting the ball to Cummings to set a dangerous attack.
POG would have been joint MOTM (again!) but was lucky to stay on the pitch after a sliding two footed challenge borne out of frustration.
Gunter did pretty well as a central defender but it meant we lacked height in our box at corners etc.
Pearce had a 'mare! Guthrie did little better although he had a screamer of a shot brilliantly saved by their keeper. I had him down as POTS after about 15 games but he has not had a good game for a while now. He likes to collect the ball, look around, pass it and then move into a position to be available for a return pass if necessary. Unlike most of our players he seems to want the ball which is good. But he likes time on the ball and he hasn't been getting that recently.
Kelly didn't look very solid but he did score our goal! Cummings did OK against a tricky winger.
Both Sharp and Alf were pretty anonymous; McCleary had a few good runs and one good tight-angled shot that just missed the post but wasn't on form today.
Royston added some life when he was brought on and was the only player seemingly capable of crossing the ball effectively (from which we scored)
Williams showed some nice touches but has not, for me, realised the potential he showed early season.
Nice to see Niall Keown given a run for the final 8 minutes or so. Can't remember him doing anything of note but good to get one of our youngsters involved.
We brought on four subs?![]()
Niall Keown is a centre back. I'm sure we brought on a midfielder by the name of Jake Taylor. I thought he looked very good, made some great runs into space but his teammates failed to spot them/pick them out.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:25
MmmMonsterMunchGlory Boymarlowuk We played well for the last 10 minutes because Forest let us. For the remainder of the game Forest played the ball around at the back (like we try to do!) but also harried us and didn't give us time on the ball. We always look bad under that sort of pressure. For the first 10-15 minutes of the second half the ball was hardly out of our half and we hardly touched the ball. I really don't understand those who say Forest were oor because then they looked anything but!! However with 10 to go, Forest decided that 1-0 was enough and tried to protect that lead. That was a mistake as it enabled us to get forward at pace and put them under pressure for a change. We got the draw that we really didn't deserve.
Forest missed two gilt-edged chances in the second half and McCarthy was forced into making a few decent saves as well. MOTM was probably Nick Blackman who worked hard, showed some good skill and had a thunderous drive that just missed the goal. He also laid off a peach of a pass deflecting the ball to Cummings to set a dangerous attack.
.
I thought for 80 minutes Forest were the best side at Mad this season ( Not that it is a great accolade in this mediocre Championship ) . Last 10 minutes they reverted to ultra defensive tactics with reckless passes and hoofballs. I would have taken a point before the game and I think this point taken in the circumstances could be good building block for us to find some form.
Not enough![]()
![]()
![]()
for that post. Forest were marginally less sh1t than us. Funny how people see games so differently.
by peterroyal76 » 01 Jan 2014 20:26
P!ssed Offpeterroyal76soggy biscuit Had the game finished 30 seconds earlier this mongboard would be in meltdown and fans would have been calling for the manager to go at the final whistle
They'll just wait until the next defeat.
And why not?
Shit all season. I think it's for the best if he goes.
Adkins has escaped today by the skin of his teeth.
Can't imagine we'll be too successful in the next two away games.
Home against Bolton: win or you're out Nigel.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:32
peterroyal76P!ssed Offpeterroyal76 They'll just wait until the next defeat.
And why not?
Shit all season. I think it's for the best if he goes.
Adkins has escaped today by the skin of his teeth.
Can't imagine we'll be too successful in the next two away games.
Home against Bolton: win or you're out Nigel.
And replace him with?
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Jan 2014 20:33
P!ssed Off
Jokes on you mate. You seem to be the only one attempting to claim it was a tight game.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 196 guests