Sheffield Wednesday v Reading - Official Predictions Thread

[Snowball]

RDG 0 2 1 4 Old Man Andrews Swift 10, Bod 40, W 49, Bod 63, Yann 85

RDG 0 0 0 1 Royal Forrester Kermie 63

===================================================================

XXX 1 1 1 1 Hound Bod 24; Wednesday 38
XXX 0 1 1 1 Tilehurstsouthbank Moore 43, Wed83
XXX 0 1 1 1 linkenholtroyal Swift

XXX 0 0 0 0 Pepe

===================================================================


XXX 0 0 2 1 double d Wed-Kelly-Wed
WED 1 0 2 1 Barney Wed 40, 55: Barrow 80

XXX 0 0 1 0 Denver Royal

XXX 0 0 2 0 Gunny Fishcake
XXX 1 0 2 0 John Smith
XXX 2 0 2 0 Mid Sussex Royal Wed 13 - Wed 29

[Basildon]

Wednesday 1-0 Reading HT
Wednesday 1-0 Reading FT


Wednesday to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Wednesday 40'

[genome]

HT Sheffield Wednesday 1 Reading 1
FT Sheffield Wednesday 1 Reading 2

Reading to score first

Barrow, Kelly

[Forbury Lion]

How is this decided? If it just the prediction furthest from the actual result?

Well if Wednesday win, then the biggest Reading-win-prediciton would be the worst prediction

and vice-versa


if it's a draw, then it's the biggest win posted (could be 3-0 to Wednesday AND 3-0 to Reading (for example)


GD, goals scored is taken into consideration

so a 3-0 defeat is worse than a 3-1 defeat,
but so is a 2-0 defeat worse than 3-1

BTW if someone posts what looks like "a silly" I don't count it

e.g. Wednesday 0-5 Reading (Barrow 5)

and what happens if Reading win 5-0 (Barrow 5)?

[muirinho]

Well if Wednesday win, then the biggest Reading-win-prediciton would be the worst prediction

and vice-versa


if it's a draw, then it's the biggest win posted (could be 3-0 to Wednesday AND 3-0 to Reading (for example)


GD, goals scored is taken into consideration

so a 3-0 defeat is worse than a 3-1 defeat,
but so is a 2-0 defeat worse than 3-1

BTW if someone posts what looks like "a silly" I don't count it

e.g. Wednesday 0-5 Reading (Barrow 5)

and what happens if Reading win 5-0 (Barrow 5)?

Frankly if that happens, we'll all be too busy celebrating to notice snowball sneakily editing his "silly suggestion" example

[Nuremberg Royal]

H.T. Sheff Wed.1-1 Reading
F.T.Sheff Wed.2-3 Reading

Kerm,Bod,Aluko

[Nuremberg Royal]

H.T. Sheff Wed.1-1 Reading
F.T.Sheff Wed.2-3 Reading

Kerm,Bod,Aluko

[UpNorth]

Wednesday 1-0 Reading HT
Wednesday 1-1 Reading FT


Wednesday to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Bod 60

[Snowball]

Well if Wednesday win, then the biggest Reading-win-prediciton would be the worst prediction

and vice-versa


if it's a draw, then it's the biggest win posted (could be 3-0 to Wednesday AND 3-0 to Reading (for example)


GD, goals scored is taken into consideration

so a 3-0 defeat is worse than a 3-1 defeat,
but so is a 2-0 defeat worse than 3-1

BTW if someone posts what looks like "a silly" I don't count it

e.g. Wednesday 0-5 Reading (Barrow 5)

and what happens if Reading win 5-0 (Barrow 5)?

I think Wow, and go to bed

[Snowball]

Frankly if that happens, we'll all be too busy celebrating to notice snowball sneakily editing his "silly suggestion" example

Nope, I START OUT saying I'm not accepting X as a genuine,
serious prediction. Therefore it wasn't accepted so it's
irrelevant.

If someone genuinely believes we are going to
win a game 5-0 with Barrow scoring all 5 goals,
I suspect they would protest. Nobody has so far.

[Denver Royal]

What happens if Reading win 5-0 (Barrow 5)?

I think Wow, and go to bed...

With the missus in tow?

[Snowball]

RDG 0 2 1 4 Old Man Andrews Swift 10, Bod 40, W 49, Bod 63, Yann 85

XXX 1 1 2 3 Nuremberg Royal Kermie, Bod, Aluko

RDG 1 1 1 2 genome Barrow, Kelly

RDG 0 0 0 1 Royal Forrester Kermie 63

=======================================================================================

XXX 1 1 1 1 Hound Bod 24; Wednesday 38
XXX 0 1 1 1 Tilehurstsouthbank Moore 43, Wed83
XXX 0 1 1 1 linkenholtroyal Swift
WED 1 0 1 1 Up North Bod 60

XXX 0 0 0 0 Pepe

========================================================================================

XXX 0 0 2 1 double d Wed-Kelly-Wed
WED 1 0 2 1 Barney Wed 40, 55: Barrow 80

XXX 0 0 1 0 Denver Royal
WED 1 0 1 0 Basildon W40

XXX 0 0 2 0 Gunny Fishcake
XXX 1 0 2 0 John Smith
XXX 2 0 2 0 Mid Sussex Royal Wed 13 - Wed 29

[seahawk10]

Wednesday 0-1 Reading HT
Wednesday 1-2 Reading FT

Reading to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Richards 30
Kermorgant 78
Wednesday 88

[Snowball]

Wednesday 0-1 Reading HT
Wednesday 1-1 Reading FT


Reading to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Bod 22
Wednesday 85

[Snowball]

RDG 0 2 1 4 Old Man Andrews Swift 10, Bod 40, W 49, Bod 63, Yann 85

XXX 1 1 2 3 Nuremberg Royal Kermie, Bod, Aluko

RDG 1 1 1 2 genome Barrow, Kelly
RDG 0 1 1 2 Seahawk Richards 30, Kermie 78 Wed 88

RDG 0 0 0 1 Royal Forrester Kermie 63

=======================================================================

XXX 1 1 1 1 Hound Bod 24; Wednesday 38
XXX 0 1 1 1 Tilehurstsouthbank Moore 43, Wed83
XXX 0 1 1 1 linkenholtroyal Swift
WED 1 0 1 1 Up North Bod 60
RDG 0 1 1 1 Snowball Bod 22, Wednesday 85

XXX 0 0 0 0 Pepe

=========================================================================

XXX 0 0 2 1 double d Wed-Kelly-Wed
WED 1 0 2 1 Barney Wed 40, 55: Barrow 80

XXX 0 0 1 0 Denver Royal
WED 1 0 1 0 Basildon W40

XXX 0 0 2 0 Gunny Fishcake
XXX 1 0 2 0 John Smith
XXX 2 0 2 0 Mid Sussex Royal Wed 13 - Wed 29

[Pepe the Horseman]

What happens if Reading win 5-0 (Barrow 5)?

I think Wow, and go to bed...

With the missus in tow?

Children read this forum, can you keep the smut for DMs please?

[linkenholtroyal]

I think Wow, and go to bed...

With the missus in tow?

Children read this forum, can you keep the smut for DMs please?

Is DMS like BDSM i get confused with all these acronyms

[Pepe the Horseman]

With the missus in tow?

Children read this forum, can you keep the smut for DMs please?

Is DMS like BDSM i get confused with all these acronyms

FOAD

[royalp-we]

Wednesday 0-0 Reading HT
Wednesday 1-1 Reading FT


Reading to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 

Aluko 51
Wednesday 89

[Snowball]

Most popular prediction is 1-1


RDG 0 2 1 4 Old Man Andrews Swift 10, Bod 40, W 49, Bod 63, Yann 85

XXX 1 1 2 3 Nuremberg Royal Kermie, Bod, Aluko

RDG 1 1 1 2 genome Barrow, Kelly
RDG 0 1 1 2 Seahawk Richards 30, Kermie 78 Wed 88

RDG 0 0 0 1 Royal Forrester Kermie 63

=============================================================================
XXX 1 1 1 1 Hound Bod 24; Wednesday 38
XXX 0 1 1 1 Tilehurstsouthbank Moore 43, Wed83
XXX 0 1 1 1 linkenholtroyal Swift
WED 1 0 1 1 Up North Bod 60
RDG 0 1 1 1 Snowball Bod 22, Wednesday 85
RDG 0 0 1 1 royalp-we Aluko 51, Wednesday 89

XXX 0 0 0 0 Pepe

=============================================================================

XXX 0 0 2 1 double d Wed-Kelly-Wed
WED 1 0 2 1 Barney Wed 40, 55: Barrow 80

XXX 0 0 1 0 Denver Royal
WED 1 0 1 0 Basildon W40

XXX 0 0 2 0 Gunny Fishcake
XXX 1 0 2 0 John Smith
XXX 2 0 2 0 Mid Sussex Royal Wed 13 - Wed 29