by linkenholtroyal » 07 Jun 2019 17:26
by Lower West » 07 Jun 2019 17:56
Crowbar6753 Luton - May start well but will get found out quickly. The Champ is a big step up in class.
by marcusopp » 07 Jun 2019 18:26
andrew1957 Assuming that there are few if any signings I think we have to be realistic that if the squad as it is now can finish 21st or better next season that would be a success. Then at the end of next season another whole load of high earners will leave - which might provide a bit more wriggle room for new signings.
On two positive notes many other clubs will equally be affected by FFP and I assume this is why there have been few Championship signings so far. Maybe the Championship standard will be a good deal lower in the coming season - which will enable us to finish a tad higher. Secondly we have a strong Academy with lots of promising youngsters and if 3-4 can establish them next season that could set us up well for 2020/21.
The worries for me are whether the likes of Moore will want to stick around for another season of struggle and will Mr Gomes also be up for another tough season? And will the fans be patient as the club sorts out the finances?
It is all a bit of an unknown right now.
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Jun 2019 18:35
by CountryRoyal » 07 Jun 2019 19:30
Snowflake Royal Was it really meant to level the playing field? Restricting spending above your income could never be argued to level the playing field between Utd and Saints even.
Or was it meant to stop clubs spending beyond their means and risking players not getting paid and the brand reputation being damaged?
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Jun 2019 19:31
CountryRoyalSnowflake Royal Was it really meant to level the playing field? Restricting spending above your income could never be argued to level the playing field between Utd and Saints even.
Or was it meant to stop clubs spending beyond their means and risking players not getting paid and the brand reputation being damaged?
Neither. It was meant to protect the traditional big clubs’ status and standings and to mitigate any threats to their position from new money clubs like City and PSG.
by SCIAG » 07 Jun 2019 19:37
marcusoppandrew1957 Assuming that there are few if any signings I think we have to be realistic that if the squad as it is now can finish 21st or better next season that would be a success. Then at the end of next season another whole load of high earners will leave - which might provide a bit more wriggle room for new signings.
On two positive notes many other clubs will equally be affected by FFP and I assume this is why there have been few Championship signings so far. Maybe the Championship standard will be a good deal lower in the coming season - which will enable us to finish a tad higher. Secondly we have a strong Academy with lots of promising youngsters and if 3-4 can establish them next season that could set us up well for 2020/21.
The worries for me are whether the likes of Moore will want to stick around for another season of struggle and will Mr Gomes also be up for another tough season? And will the fans be patient as the club sorts out the finances?
It is all a bit of an unknown right now.
Good points. FFP was meant to 'level the playing field', but the gap is increasing. You're right that the overall standard of the championship will fall as clubs struggle to attract decent players, while Chelsea and Man City will continue to find loop-holes. Bit like politics this! Chelsea and City are the rich tory voters while the other clubs are all working class labour voters. At least we've got the moral high ground, albeit with bad football and a crap squad. Feel like i should have a northern accent now!!
by CountryRoyal » 07 Jun 2019 19:42
Snowflake RoyalCountryRoyalSnowflake Royal Was it really meant to level the playing field? Restricting spending above your income could never be argued to level the playing field between Utd and Saints even.
Or was it meant to stop clubs spending beyond their means and risking players not getting paid and the brand reputation being damaged?
Neither. It was meant to protect the traditional big clubs’ status and standings and to mitigate any threats to their position from new money clubs like City and PSG.
Worked well.
by Wallsy » 07 Jun 2019 21:41
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Jun 2019 22:36
CountryRoyalSnowflake RoyalCountryRoyal
Neither. It was meant to protect the traditional big clubs’ status and standings and to mitigate any threats to their position from new money clubs like City and PSG.
Worked well.
It has in that regard. FFP came in after their investment. Whilst FFP exists we won’t see another club being bankrolled to that level of success (obviously), not under the current rules anyway.
by URZZZZ » 08 Jun 2019 01:03
Lower WestCrowbar6753 Luton - May start well but will get found out quickly. The Champ is a big step up in class.
Sheff United came up with a settled team with no outstanding individuals.
by seahawk10 » 08 Jun 2019 07:30
by Hound » 08 Jun 2019 08:03
by Nameless » 08 Jun 2019 08:05
seahawk10 The youngsters need to come through. I wouldn't mind a season or two of surviving while clearing bloated contracts off the books but it seems like there is no end in sight to the financial woes.
by maffff » 09 Jun 2019 15:26
Namelessseahawk10 The youngsters need to come through. I wouldn't mind a season or two of surviving while clearing bloated contracts off the books but it seems like there is no end in sight to the financial woes.
Actually I think the opposite is the case. We’ve got a short term issue with the restrictions of FFP. This will go in a couple of seasons as the excessive contracts run out.
by maffff » 09 Jun 2019 15:28
Hound There should be an end to the financial woes. We were in an ok position before Gourlay and co ballsed up.
by 3points » 09 Jun 2019 16:19
Crowbar6753Snowflake Royal We're in the same dangerous territory we've been in for years.
But a lot of the repairs have started. A tight, well motivated, drilled and dedicated squad can take you a long way in the Championship and there's plenty of promise in our Academy.
With the work we're doing, even if the worst happens and we go down we'll be much better placed to recover than we would have been this season.
My thoughts exactly, if we can keep Jose and trim the squad even more then i would be reasonably happy. With a smaller and more hungry squad with a full pre-season under their belts i really think we could push for a mid table finish. It would also be nice to see a few more youngsters having breakout seasons from the U-23s.
I would expect Loader and Oliese to featue more and to continue their improvement, and Rinhomota should get even better which is a huge plus, and anything else will be a bonus.
A fellow Nobber asked the question regarding three teams worse than us? Well its tough to pick three teams worse than us but i do believe theirs a group of maybe 6 teams in the same boat as us.
Wigan - Almost identical to us i believe.
QPR - Fell away badly at the end of last season which often spells danger.
Barnsley - Perennial YO-YO team.
Blackburn - Over achieved last season and may struggle.
Millwall - Same old Millwall lol. Lots of guts but not much class.
Luton - May start well but will get found out quickly. The Champ is a big step up in class.
by Denver Royal » 09 Jun 2019 16:31
3pointsCrowbar6753Snowflake Royal We're in the same dangerous territory we've been in for years.
But a lot of the repairs have started. A tight, well motivated, drilled and dedicated squad can take you a long way in the Championship and there's plenty of promise in our Academy.
With the work we're doing, even if the worst happens and we go down we'll be much better placed to recover than we would have been this season.
My thoughts exactly, if we can keep Jose and trim the squad even more then i would be reasonably happy. With a smaller and more hungry squad with a full pre-season under their belts i really think we could push for a mid table finish. It would also be nice to see a few more youngsters having breakout seasons from the U-23s.
I would expect Loader and Oliese to featue more and to continue their improvement, and Rinhomota should get even better which is a huge plus, and anything else will be a bonus.
A fellow Nobber asked the question regarding three teams worse than us? Well its tough to pick three teams worse than us but i do believe theirs a group of maybe 6 teams in the same boat as us.
Wigan - Almost identical to us i believe.
QPR - Fell away badly at the end of last season which often spells danger.
Barnsley - Perennial YO-YO team.
Blackburn - Over achieved last season and may struggle.
Millwall - Same old Millwall lol. Lots of guts but not much class.
Luton - May start well but will get found out quickly. The Champ is a big step up in class.
I reckon you can add Charlton to that list, and possibly Birmingham and Sheff Weds. Birmingham will presumably be selling lots of players to keep FFP balanced this summer, including Che Adams. Sheff Weds have also started a big clear out thought you’d expect Bruce to keep them mid table regardless of players.
Overall FFP may have the benefit of teams reducing squad sizes which will create opportunities for academy players. This can only be good for English football in the long run.
by maffff » 09 Jun 2019 18:13
by Snowflake Royal » 09 Jun 2019 19:30
maffff Embargo ends tomorrow
Users browsing this forum: Gunny Fishcake, RG30, Snowflake Royal and 342 guests