by Simon's Church » 16 Aug 2023 06:55
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Aug 2023 07:19
CountryRoyal How can people be changing their tune going from “relegation is a disaster” to “now I think it’s good” based on the back off a 1 nil, ultimately laboured, home win against arguably the worst side in the division, and it was a massive own goal.
Glad to get off the mark and delighted fit the kids (and button) but one swallow does not a summer make.
One thing is evident is how much easier games are against players who don’t care (Millwall Vs limited but competitive chelt).
by Royal_jimmy » 16 Aug 2023 07:41
72 busRoyal_jimmy My honest opinion....
Thought we played nice football at times, particularly in the first half but we're looking blunt and lightweight up top. We need to work on our end product and fitness. Second half was poor and we faded again, I'm questioning whether we're fit enough to sustain this style. Hopefully with Selles being a fitness coach he'll be working on that and we are more consistent in games. Cheltenham were poor and didn't really look like scoring although Abbey and Bindon did keep their attack fairly quiet still.
We need to be patient, our youngsters will make mistakes but they'll improve in time. I'm excited to see them grow and embrace the high intensity style of play.
Don't really get the massive excitement, we beat Cheltenham from a bit of a flukey OG.. big deal, with no disrespect to Cheltenham. Pleased we're off the mark but I didn't think it was that amazing. Did just about enough to win and probably a fair scoreline. Wasnt a great game and not many chances. Can see the massive drop in quality in this league.
Can see the massive drop in quality in you're posts *
*an already low bar
by Hound » 16 Aug 2023 07:45
by Royal_jimmy » 16 Aug 2023 07:49
Snowball I really don’t get the negativity in BFTG.
Cheltenham may be a likely relegation team but they are still experienced pros and for most of this match the Reading youngsters took them to the cleaners with 2/3 possession and limiting Cheltenham to three very tame attempts on goal.
Cheltenham hardly looked like scoring. Most of their attacks were breaks and Button was never seriously exposed.
Meanwhile Southwood had to make at least three fine saves, one from Carson at full stretch, another from Wing, a third was a fingertip save from Vickers, there was a fourth also in the corner, this time from Azeez.
I seem to remember players free in the Cheltenham box, balls flying across the area (Andy Carroll would have had a field day) and at least one nasty cross stretched Southwood.
We could easily have gone in 4-0 at HT
People say we faded in the second half, as if the boys were knackered. It looked more like they were settling for 1-0 (when I really wanted us to go for a second goal).
The subs looked defensive, and if you sit back you invite any side to have a go… but was Button troubled? Not at all.
He may have stopped a couple. One was a lame, tame shot straight to him, another was a soft header straight into his arms.
I thought this was a comprehensive win and far better than the win at Millwall where Millwall’s defence was appalling on the night.
We dealt with breaks brilliantly. These lads chase harder than any of the old hands who played at Port Vale.
They played like they’d played together (and well) for years. They won countless headers against bigger, heavier men, ran their hearts out to get back to cover. The two CBs looked untroubled. LB Carson was excellent. Mbengue OK but not as stand-out.
The midfield played some lovely stuff. I noticed Savage the most, followed by Camara. Savage is a very neat player, seems to have that extra second. He would be in my starting 11 every time
EHIBxx was a threat all night (and was getting fouled a helluva lot) and the small child also known as Vickers ran his socks off and showed shedloads of skill.
I also thought “Old Man McIntyre” (24) played very well as sub.
by Royal_jimmy » 16 Aug 2023 07:58
parkySnowball I really don’t get the negativity in BFTG.
Cheltenham may be a likely relegation team but they are still experienced pros and for most of this match the Reading youngsters took them to the cleaners with 2/3 possession and limiting Cheltenham to three very tame attempts on goal.
Cheltenham hardly looked like scoring. Most of their attacks were breaks and Button was never seriously exposed.
Meanwhile Southwood had to make at least three fine saves, one from Carson at full stretch, another from Wing, a third was a fingertip save from Vickers, there was a fourth also in the corner, this time from Azeez.
I seem to remember players free in the Cheltenham box, balls flying across the area (Andy Carroll would have had a field day) and at least one nasty cross stretched Southwood.
We could easily have gone in 4-0 at HT
People say we faded in the second half, as if the boys were knackered. It looked more like they were settling for 1-0 (when I really wanted us to go for a second goal).
The subs looked defensive, and if you sit back you invite any side to have a go… but was Button troubled? Not at all.
He may have stopped a couple. One was a lame, tame shot straight to him, another was a soft header straight into his arms.
I thought this was a comprehensive win and far better than the win at Millwall where Millwall’s defence was appalling on the night.
We dealt with breaks brilliantly. These lads chase harder than any of the old hands who played at Port Vale.
They played like they’d played together (and well) for years. They won countless headers against bigger, heavier men, ran their hearts out to get back to cover. The two CBs looked untroubled. LB Carson was excellent. Mbengue OK but not as stand-out.
The midfield played some lovely stuff. I noticed Savage the most, followed by Camara. Savage is a very neat player, seems to have that extra second. He would be in my starting 11 every time
EHIBxx was a threat all night (and was getting fouled a helluva lot) and the small child also known as Vickers ran his socks off and showed shedloads of skill.
I also thought “Old Man McIntyre” (24) played very well as sub.
We were noticibly poorer when he came one. All their attacks came down that side and he was caught out. Carson could well be the best LB at the club.
by blythspartan » 16 Aug 2023 08:22
Royal_jimmyparkySnowball I really don’t get the negativity in BFTG.
Cheltenham may be a likely relegation team but they are still experienced pros and for most of this match the Reading youngsters took them to the cleaners with 2/3 possession and limiting Cheltenham to three very tame attempts on goal.
Cheltenham hardly looked like scoring. Most of their attacks were breaks and Button was never seriously exposed.
Meanwhile Southwood had to make at least three fine saves, one from Carson at full stretch, another from Wing, a third was a fingertip save from Vickers, there was a fourth also in the corner, this time from Azeez.
I seem to remember players free in the Cheltenham box, balls flying across the area (Andy Carroll would have had a field day) and at least one nasty cross stretched Southwood.
We could easily have gone in 4-0 at HT
People say we faded in the second half, as if the boys were knackered. It looked more like they were settling for 1-0 (when I really wanted us to go for a second goal).
The subs looked defensive, and if you sit back you invite any side to have a go… but was Button troubled? Not at all.
He may have stopped a couple. One was a lame, tame shot straight to him, another was a soft header straight into his arms.
I thought this was a comprehensive win and far better than the win at Millwall where Millwall’s defence was appalling on the night.
We dealt with breaks brilliantly. These lads chase harder than any of the old hands who played at Port Vale.
They played like they’d played together (and well) for years. They won countless headers against bigger, heavier men, ran their hearts out to get back to cover. The two CBs looked untroubled. LB Carson was excellent. Mbengue OK but not as stand-out.
The midfield played some lovely stuff. I noticed Savage the most, followed by Camara. Savage is a very neat player, seems to have that extra second. He would be in my starting 11 every time
EHIBxx was a threat all night (and was getting fouled a helluva lot) and the small child also known as Vickers ran his socks off and showed shedloads of skill.
I also thought “Old Man McIntyre” (24) played very well as sub.
We were noticibly poorer when he came one. All their attacks came down that side and he was caught out. Carson could well be the best LB at the club.
He was terrific last night. He's a lot more balanced than NGW in that position. Him and Abbey were my MoM picks.
by Stranded » 16 Aug 2023 08:25
by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Aug 2023 08:30
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 16 Aug 2023 08:31
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Aug 2023 09:17
by Stranded » 16 Aug 2023 09:30
Snowflake Royal Really good seeing the young players deliver. We've a long way to go yet. Finally some pace at the back and it got usout of jail more than once.
Button continues to be adequate but shakey at times, Southwood the better of the two keepers.
Defence played well, but I remain unconvinced by Mbengue's reading of the game at fullback. I don’t think that line up would stand up so well to a good L1 attack. For me centreback should be:
McIntyre/Dean/Holmes
Abbey/Mbengue/Binden
Amazing that Dorsett now seems nowhere.
Midfield was better, but still needs much more movement. Camara and Knibbs did ok, if unspectacular.
Vickers looks quality, but we mustn't burn him out, lots to develop. Ehib is a cracking player but fades early.
Lots of promise, the next few months still likely to be a slog. 3 league games in and no goals for a Reading player yet.
by morganb » 16 Aug 2023 09:39
StrandedSnowflake Royal Really good seeing the young players deliver. We've a long way to go yet. Finally some pace at the back and it got usout of jail more than once.
Button continues to be adequate but shakey at times, Southwood the better of the two keepers.
Defence played well, but I remain unconvinced by Mbengue's reading of the game at fullback. I don’t think that line up would stand up so well to a good L1 attack. For me centreback should be:
McIntyre/Dean/Holmes
Abbey/Mbengue/Binden
Amazing that Dorsett now seems nowhere.
Midfield was better, but still needs much more movement. Camara and Knibbs did ok, if unspectacular.
Vickers looks quality, but we mustn't burn him out, lots to develop. Ehib is a cracking player but fades early.
Lots of promise, the next few months still likely to be a slog. 3 league games in and no goals for a Reading player yet.
Honest question as we all see things differently but what was it about Button's performance yesterday that you considered shaky? He claimed every high ball perfectly, including coming through players on a couple of occasions - dealt with the few efforts on goal calmly and effectively. Was constantly communicating with the back 4 and you could see the relationship between the CBs and him build throughout the game and his distribution was decent bar maybe 1 or 2 that he overcooked. There was the backpass mix up in the first 5 mins but that seemed to be more a bit of nerves from Bindon that on the GK.
Essentially, and I know it is one game, he countered pretty much every negative we've heard about him and finally being first choice again looks like it may help him regain the confidence he clearly lost at WBA. Am sure there will be games where we wonder why we bothered but last night he showed a lot of the traits that the club were clearly looking for in a keeper - he fits the plan.
by paultheroyal » 16 Aug 2023 09:40
by Royal_jimmy » 16 Aug 2023 09:48
by Maguire » 16 Aug 2023 09:54
by paultheroyal » 16 Aug 2023 09:54
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Aug 2023 10:31
StrandedSnowflake Royal Really good seeing the young players deliver. We've a long way to go yet. Finally some pace at the back and it got usout of jail more than once.
Button continues to be adequate but shakey at times, Southwood the better of the two keepers.
Defence played well, but I remain unconvinced by Mbengue's reading of the game at fullback. I don’t think that line up would stand up so well to a good L1 attack. For me centreback should be:
McIntyre/Dean/Holmes
Abbey/Mbengue/Binden
Amazing that Dorsett now seems nowhere.
Midfield was better, but still needs much more movement. Camara and Knibbs did ok, if unspectacular.
Vickers looks quality, but we mustn't burn him out, lots to develop. Ehib is a cracking player but fades early.
Lots of promise, the next few months still likely to be a slog. 3 league games in and no goals for a Reading player yet.
Honest question as we all see things differently but what was it about Button's performance yesterday that you considered shaky? He claimed every high ball perfectly, including coming through players on a couple of occasions - dealt with the few efforts on goal calmly and effectively. Was constantly communicating with the back 4 and you could see the relationship between the CBs and him build throughout the game and his distribution was decent bar maybe 1 or 2 that he overcooked. There was the backpass mix up in the first 5 mins but that seemed to be more a bit of nerves from Bindon that on the GK.
Essentially, and I know it is one game, he countered pretty much every negative we've heard about him and finally being first choice again looks like it may help him regain the confidence he clearly lost at WBA. Am sure there will be games where we wonder why we bothered but last night he showed a lot of the traits that the club were clearly looking for in a keeper - he fits the plan.
by NewCorkSeth » 16 Aug 2023 10:33
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Aug 2023 10:38
Users browsing this forum: st george and 303 guests